CClaimWatch
Defense counsel in 7 cases

Gary S Feinerman

Latham & Watkins LLP

Address of record
330 N Wabash Ave, Suite 2800, Chicago, IL 60611, 312-876-7700
Email
gary.feinerman@lw.com
Phone
(312) 876-7700
Fax
Fax Active

Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.

7
Cases tracked
6 active · 1 settled
—
Plaintiff-side recovery
Disclosed settlement funds
$59.5M
Defense-side exposure
Resolved in settlements
1
Cases with values
of 7 tracked

Case history

Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.

Defense counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Robinson v. Meta Platforms Data/Privacy Class Action

A proposed class action against Meta Platforms, Inc. filed in federal court in Northern California. Based on the nature of suit code (890 Other Statutory Actions), this appears to involve allegations concerning user data, privacy practices, or similar statutory claims affecting ordinary users, though specific details are not available from the docket metadata provided.

Filed
February 24, 2026
Represents
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Defense counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Ticketmaster Consumer Fraud Class Action

This appears to be a proposed class action against Ticketmaster LLC, a ticketing company, asserting claims under the federal 'Other Fraud' nature-of-suit code. The publicly available docket entries do not describe the specific alleged conduct, but they indicate that the plaintiff initially pursued the case and later voluntarily dismissed it without prejudice after the defendant moved to transfer it to the Northern District of Illinois. The complaint apparently concerned alleged fraudulent practices related to ticket sales or fees, but these are allegations, not proven facts, and there is no settlement.

Filed
November 21, 2024
Represents
Ticketmaster LLC
Defense counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Meta Platforms Antitrust Class Action

A proposed class action against Meta Platforms, Inc., apparently concerning antitrust or anticompetitive conduct under federal law. The docket text does not include substantive allegations, but the case is docketed as an antitrust matter. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts and not yet a settlement.

Filed
November 18, 2024
Represents
Netflix, Inc.
Defense counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Lamb Weston Frozen Potato Antitrust Class Action

A proposed class action against Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc., apparently alleging antitrust violations in the market for frozen potato products. The docket references 'Consumer Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs,' suggesting that ordinary consumers who purchased potato products may be included as putative class members. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts, and there is no settlement at this stage.

Filed
November 15, 2024
Represents
Cavendish Farms, Inc.
Defense counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

MultiPlan Health Insurance Antitrust Class Action

A proposed class action against MultiPlan Inc. and several major health insurers, apparently alleging antitrust violations related to health insurance or healthcare cost management. The docket indicates the plaintiff later voluntarily dismissed claims without prejudice against Aetna, Cigna, Elevance Health, Humana, and UnitedHealth Group, leaving MultiPlan as a defendant. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts and not yet a settlement.

Filed
November 5, 2024
Represents
MultiPlan Inc
Defense counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Nebula Genomics Privacy Class Action

This is a proposed class action against Nebula Genomics, Inc. The case appears to involve privacy or civil rights claims related to its genetic testing services, but the docket text does not describe specific factual allegations. The case also names Meta Platforms, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, and Google LLC as parties and has been transferred to the District of Massachusetts.

Filed
October 10, 2024
Represents
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Defense counselSettled — claims closed

Period Tracker Data Privacy Settlement (Flo, Google, Flurry)

Between November 2016 and February 2019, the Flo period and ovulation tracker app allegedly incorporated code from third-party software development kits (from Flurry, Meta, and Google) through which user information related to menstruation and pregnancy was allegedly shared without proper legal authorization. Google agreed to pay $48 million, Flo agreed to pay $8 million, and Flurry agreed to pay $3.5 million to settle. All defendants deny wrongdoing and assert they did nothing wrong.

Settlement fund
$59.5M
Claim deadline
October 15, 2026
Represents
Facebook, Inc.

“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.