Jonathan Flexer Neumann
Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP
- Address of record
- 280 King of Prussia Road, Radnor, PA 19087, (610) 667-7706
- jneumann@ktmc.com
- Phone
- (610) 667-7706
- Fax
- Fax Pro Hac Vice
Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.
Case history
Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.
U.S. Bancorp Fraud Class Action
A proposed class action against U.S. Bancorp and U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc. appears to assert fraud claims (nature of suit 370). The docket indicates the defendants moved to dismiss and the amended complaint was dismissed with prejudice. No further specific allegations are detailed in the provided entries.
- Filed
- April 15, 2025
- Represents
- Adam Saul Futo, James Bartley Ellis
Merrill Lynch Cash Sweep Programs Class Action
This is a proposed class action against Merrill Lynch, apparently concerning its cash sweep programs. The available docket text indicates the case has been consolidated with related actions under the caption 'In re Merrill Lynch Cash Sweep Programs,' but does not detail the specific allegations. The claims are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts.
- Filed
- November 13, 2024
- Represents
- Robert J. Campton, Jr.
Robinhood Cash Sweep Program Class Action
A proposed class action against Robinhood entities apparently concerning the Robinhood Cash Sweep Program. The docket entries reflect class certification briefing and related sealing motions, but the specific allegations are not detailed in the provided metadata. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts.
- Filed
- October 25, 2024
- Represents
- Basudeb Dey
Apria Healthcare Data Breach Settlement
Apria Healthcare experienced illegal hacking events that resulted in unauthorized access to or disclosure of customers' protected information. The company sent notices to affected individuals about the potential compromise of their data. Apria denies any wrongdoing.
- Claim deadline
- October 22, 2025
- Represents
- SUZANNE CUYLE
Local TV Advertising Settlement
Plaintiffs claimed that broadcaster defendants engaged in a conspiracy to fix, raise, maintain, or stabilize the price levels of broadcast television spot advertising, and that sales rep firms and other entities facilitated communication between them. As a result, plaintiffs allegedly paid artificially inflated prices. The settling defendants deny all wrongdoing but have agreed to settle to avoid the cost and inconvenience of further litigation.
- Settlement fund
- $48M
- Claim deadline
- October 26, 2023
- Represents
- Law Offices of Peter Miller, P.A.
Snap Inc. Securities Litigation Settlement
Plaintiffs alleged that Snap Inc., certain of its executives and directors, and underwriters for Snap's Initial Public Offering made materially false and misleading statements and omissions about Snap's business. The parties have reached proposed settlements to resolve these claims.
- Claim deadline
- Represents
- David Steinberg, Tom DiBiase
“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.