CClaimWatch
Plaintiff counsel in 46 cases

Joshua R. Wilner

Bursor & Fisher P.A.

Address of record
1990 North California Boulevard, 9th Floor, Walnut Creek, CA 94596, (925) 300-4400
Email
jwilner@bursor.com
Phone
(925) 300-4400
Fax
Fax (925) 407-2700

Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.

46
Cases tracked
42 active · 4 settled
$800,000
Plaintiff-side recovery
Disclosed settlement funds
—
Defense-side exposure
Resolved in settlements
2
Cases with values
of 46 tracked

Case history

Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.

Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Maurer v. Edward D. Jones & Co.

A proposed class action has been filed against Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P., apparently concerning personal injury or wrongful conduct. The specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket information, but the case appears to involve claims that could affect customers or account holders of the defendant financial services firm.

Filed
August 12, 2026
Represents
Theresa Stevens, Richard Mortensen, Dennis Frasher, Vishal Shah
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Skaggs v. X.AI Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against X.AI, LLC in federal court in Northern California. The docket entries reference a class action complaint and a motion to dismiss, but the specific factual allegations are not disclosed in the available docket metadata. The case involves personal injury claims (Nature of Suit code 360) and remains in early stages with briefing on the motion to dismiss ongoing.

Filed
May 14, 2026
Represents
Austin Skaggs
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Couture v. OpenAI Global, LLC

This proposed class action alleges claims against OpenAI Global, LLC. Based on the docket entries showing a motion to dismiss and first amended complaint, the case appears to involve consumer-facing allegations, though the specific nature of the claims cannot be determined from the caption and docket metadata alone. The case is in early stages with motions practice ongoing.

Filed
May 13, 2026
Represents
Amargo Couture
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Trevor Charles v. Snap, Inc. Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against Snap, Inc. in federal court. The docket entries indicate this is a newly filed class action complaint, though the specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket metadata. The case involves consumer claims against the social media platform.

Filed
May 7, 2026
Represents
Trevor Charles
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Eichinger v. 33across Data Privacy Class Action

A proposed class action against 33across, Inc., apparently concerning data privacy or consumer information practices. The nature of suit indicates a personal injury matter, which in the context of a putative class action against a technology or data company typically involves allegations related to unauthorized data collection, improper use of consumer information, or similar privacy-related harms affecting ordinary users or website visitors.

Filed
April 6, 2026
Represents
Jeffrey Eichinger
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Shah v. Edward D. Jones & Co. Class Action

A proposed class action filed against Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P., a financial services firm. The specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket information, but the case is brought under federal statutory grounds. The nature of suit suggests claims arising from consumer or account-holder transactions with the defendant.

Filed
February 27, 2026
Represents
Vishal Shah
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Babka v. United Legwear Company Consumer Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against United Legwear Company, LLC in federal court. The specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket information, though the case is classified as involving other statutory actions. Without access to the complaint or additional docket entries, the precise nature of the consumer claims remains unclear.

Filed
February 26, 2026
Represents
Zachary Babka
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Maurer v. Edward D. Jones & Co. Consumer Class Action

A proposed class action against Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P., apparently concerning claims by customers or account holders. The nature of suit code indicates a personal injury or consumer matter, though specific allegations are not available from the docket metadata provided.

Filed
February 6, 2026
Represents
Theresa Stevens, Richard Mortensen, Dennis Frasher
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Yee v. Fandango Media Class Action

This is a proposed class action filed against Fandango Media, LLC, a video streaming and entertainment platform. Based on the nature-of-suit code (360 P.I.: Other), the complaint appears to allege personal injury or privacy-related claims, though the specific allegations cannot be determined without access to the actual complaint. Ordinary consumers using Fandango's services could plausibly be class members if the claims involve privacy violations, data practices, or consumer harm.

Filed
January 6, 2026
Represents
Daniel Yee
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Nieves v. Microsoft Corporation

A proposed class action has been filed against Microsoft Corporation in the Northern District of California. The specific allegations are not clear from the available docket information, as the first docket entry is unavailable. Additional details about the nature of the claims would be needed to provide a more complete description of what the case alleges.

Filed
December 9, 2025
Represents
Lana Nieves, Stacy Penning, Sunggil Hong, Laura Bonetti, Jonathan Finestone
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Rodriguez v. Healthline Media Data Privacy Class Action

A proposed class action against Healthline Media, LLC, apparently concerning privacy or data-related claims involving users or consumers of the defendant's services or platform. The case was filed in federal court in the Northern District of California in November 2025, though specific allegations cannot be determined from the limited docket information available.

Filed
November 14, 2025
Represents
Monica Rodriguez
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

LaBrusciano-Carris v. HP Hood LLC Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action against HP Hood LLC alleges fraud, apparently concerning misrepresentations or deceptive practices related to food or beverage products. The lawsuit appears to be brought on behalf of consumers who purchased the defendant's products, though specific details about the alleged misconduct are not available from the docket metadata provided.

Filed
November 7, 2025
Represents
Theo LaBrusciano-Carris
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Young v. People Inc.

A proposed class action has been filed against People Inc. in federal court in Northern California. Based on the nature of suit classification of 'Other Personal Injury,' the lawsuit appears to allege some form of personal injury or consumer harm, though the specific allegations cannot be determined from the limited docket information available.

Filed
November 6, 2025
Represents
Valerie Young, Stacee Severino
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Gates v. The A2 Milk Company Fraud Class Action

This is a proposed class action against The A2 Milk Company alleging fraud, apparently concerning misrepresentations related to the company's dairy or milk products. Based solely on the caption and nature of suit code (Other Fraud), the specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket information, but the case suggests plaintiffs are challenging claims made by the company about its products to consumers.

Filed
September 12, 2025
Represents
Alexis Gates, Chaka Theus
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Macy's Personal Injury Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against Macy's, Inc. in federal court in Northern California. Based on the personal injury nature of suit coding, the complaint apparently alleges that Macy's is responsible for injuries to consumers, though specific details about the alleged harm are not available from the docket information provided.

Filed
August 21, 2025
Represents
Thu Nguyen
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Morgan v. Hippo Holdings Class Action

A proposed class action filed against Hippo Holdings, Inc., an insurance company. Based on the nature of suit coding (360 P.I.: Other), the complaint apparently alleges some form of personal injury or consumer harm, though specific allegations cannot be determined from the caption and docket metadata alone.

Filed
July 29, 2025
Represents
Lauren Morgan
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

iHeartMedia Consumer Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against iHeartMedia, Inc. in federal court in Northern California. Based on the case caption and docket information available, the specific allegations are not detailed in the provided materials, but the lawsuit appears to involve personal injury or consumer claims against the media company.

Filed
July 17, 2025
Represents
Trevor Harris
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Krzyzek v. OpenX Technologies Data Privacy Class Action

A proposed class action against OpenX Technologies, Inc., apparently concerning privacy violations or data handling practices. The nature of suit code (360 P.I.: Other) suggests personal injury or privacy-related claims, though the specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket metadata.

Filed
July 2, 2025
Represents
Kiley Krzyzek, Christian Calcines
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Magnite Privacy Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against Magnite, Inc. by plaintiff Lisa Tsering. The nature of suit is listed as P.I.: Other, which often includes privacy-related claims, though the docket text does not specify the exact allegations. The case is in its early stages, with the parties stipulating to extend the defendant's time to respond to the complaint.

Filed
May 29, 2025
Represents
Lisa Tsering, Ariel Gilligan, Logan Mitchell, Marc Russo, Dilara Uskup
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

MW Polar Foods Consumer Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action against MW Polar Foods Corporation was filed by Beverly Beal and Courtney Whetstone. The nature of suit is listed as 'Other Fraud,' suggesting allegations of deceptive or fraudulent conduct, but the docket text does not detail the specific claims. The case was later voluntarily dismissed with prejudice.

Filed
May 28, 2025
Represents
Beverly Beal, Courtney Whetstone
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Conde Nast Digital Class Action

This is a proposed class action against Conde Nast Digital. The docket does not detail the specific allegations, but the case is categorized as 'P.I.: Other,' suggesting tort claims. No further facts about the underlying conduct are available from the caption and docket text.

Filed
May 8, 2025
Represents
Aaron Deivaprakash
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Unigo Privacy Class Action

This is a proposed class action against Unigo LLC, apparently concerning claims categorized as 'P.I.: Other.' The available docket text does not detail the specific allegations, but the case may involve privacy-related or personal-injury claims. These are allegations only, not proven facts.

Filed
May 1, 2025
Represents
Scarlett Mosher
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

LinkedIn Privacy Class Action

A proposed class action against LinkedIn Corporation, apparently concerning personal injury or other claims brought by plaintiffs identified as Jane Doe and Cynthia Hays. The docket reflects a first amended consolidated class action complaint, but details of the alleged conduct are not available from the caption and docket entries; the use of pseudonymous plaintiffs suggests privacy-related allegations.

Filed
April 29, 2025
Represents
Jane Doe, Cynthia Hays
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Pharmavite Consumer Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action against Pharmavite LLC, apparently concerning alleged fraud involving its consumer products. The court docket indicates motion practice and a forthcoming answer, but does not detail the specific product claims in the provided entries. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts, and no settlement is described.

Filed
April 18, 2025
Represents
Melissa Lang, Mildred Sevy
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Chobani Consumer Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action against Chobani, LLC, apparently concerning alleged fraudulent or deceptive practices related to its food products. The lawsuit is based on the nature of suit for other fraud, though specific details of the allegations are not provided in the docket text. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts and not yet a settlement.

Filed
April 16, 2025
Represents
Amy Wysocki
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

PubMatic Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed in federal court against PubMatic Inc. by individual plaintiffs. The docket entries reflect a first amended class action complaint and PubMatic's answer, but the specific legal claims are not stated in the provided text. The allegations have not been proven.

Filed
April 8, 2025
Represents
Kirstie Semien, Gilbert Gaw, Michael Selby, Logan Mitchell, Jane Doe
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Boba Guys Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action against Boba Guys Inc., apparently concerning fraud claims. The specific alleged conduct is not detailed in the available docket text, but the case is proceeding toward class certification. James Totten is the named plaintiff.

Filed
April 1, 2025
Represents
James Totten
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

The Trade Desk Privacy Class Action

A proposed class action was filed against The Trade Desk, Inc. in federal court. The case is docketed as a personal injury/other matter, and the defendant is an advertising technology company, suggesting the lawsuit may involve alleged privacy violations affecting consumers. The allegations are unproven and the case is newly filed.

Filed
March 28, 2025
Represents
Jorge Hernandez-Mendoza, Stacy Penning, Laura Bonetti, Tanisha Dantignac, Jessica Ju, Robert Mason
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

The Trade Desk Data Privacy Class Action

A proposed class action against The Trade Desk, Inc., apparently concerning data privacy. The case caption indicates data privacy litigation, though no specific allegations are available from the docket metadata. These are newly filed allegations, not proven facts, and no settlement is indicated.

Filed
March 28, 2025
Represents
Doug Michie, Justin Dyer, Jennifer Turner, Jessica Ju
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Experian Data Corporation Privacy Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against Experian Data Corporation. Based on the caption and nature of suit, the case appears to concern alleged privacy or personal-information-related harm to consumers. No additional details are available from the docket text.

Filed
March 27, 2025
Represents
Maria Lopez, Ariel Gilligan, Kirstie Semien, Logan Mitchell, Michael Selby
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Zenchi Personal Injury Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against Zenchi, Inc. The docket indicates a personal injury (other) nature of suit, but provides no specific factual allegations about the claimed harm. The case remains in early stages, and the allegations are unproven.

Filed
February 13, 2025
Represents
Nicholas Ionescu
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Mashable Privacy Class Action

A proposed class action against Mashable Inc., a digital media company. The nature of suit is 'Other Statutory Actions,' suggesting a claim under a federal statute, possibly involving privacy or consumer protection. The specific allegations are not stated in the available caption information.

Filed
February 3, 2025
Represents
Dawn Fregosa
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Experian Privacy Class Action

A proposed class action against Experian Data Corporation, apparently concerning privacy or personal injury claims. The docket text does not provide specific allegations, but the nature of suit is 'P.I.: Other' and the defendant is a consumer data company.

Filed
January 29, 2025
Represents
ZhiCheng Zhen, Marcus Johnson, Jane Doe, Kelda McKinney, Dilara Uskup, Marc Russo
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Mixpanel Privacy Class Action

A proposed class action against Mixpanel, Inc., apparently concerning alleged privacy violations related to its analytics services. The case was filed in the Northern District of California, based on the docket caption and nature of suit.

Filed
January 28, 2025
Represents
Benjamin Glenn, Ara Sardarbegians
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Elevate Labs Consumer Class Action

A proposed class action against Elevate Labs, LLC and MindSnacks, Inc. The available docket text does not specify the underlying statutory claims, but the case is docketed as an 'Other Statutory Actions' class-action complaint, and defendants have filed a motion to compel arbitration. The allegations appear to involve consumer-facing mobile apps or services, but the exact conduct is not described in the metadata.

Filed
November 18, 2024
Represents
Jonathan Kroskey
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Pear Health Labs Class Action

A proposed class action against Pear Health Labs, Inc. was filed in the Northern District of California. The nature-of-suit code indicates claims under a federal statute not separately categorized, but the caption and docket text do not provide further details about the alleged conduct.

Filed
November 12, 2024
Represents
Kasra Sarhadi
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Call-On-Doc Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against Call-On-Doc, Inc., apparently a telehealth provider. The plaintiff is identified only as 'Doe,' and the docket text does not detail the specific allegations beyond the nature of suit 'P.I.: Other.' These are allegations only, not proven facts.

Filed
November 7, 2024
Represents
Jane Doe, Charlie Lucas
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

RiseWell Fraud Class Action

This is a proposed class action against RiseWell LLC. The lawsuit appears to allege fraudulent conduct, as indicated by the 'Other Fraud' nature of suit. The specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket text, and no facts have been proven.

Filed
October 25, 2024
Represents
Alana Watkins
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

FitOn Class Action

A proposed class action was filed against FitOn, Inc. The provided docket entries do not specify the underlying allegations; they reference class certification and a proposed class action settlement. The case was later voluntarily dismissed without prejudice, and no factual findings are described.

Filed
October 22, 2024
Represents
Ava Hoffman, Shante Pierro, Daniela Zamor
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Carol Cole Company Consumer Fraud Class Action

This is a proposed class action against Carol Cole Company, Inc., apparently alleging fraud (Nature of Suit 370 Other Fraud). The docket text indicates the parties are engaged in settlement discussions and early neutral evaluation. Specific factual allegations are not detailed in the provided entries.

Filed
October 18, 2024
Represents
Onika Chambers
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Kimberly-Clark Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action against Kimberly-Clark Corporation, apparently involving allegations of fraud related to its consumer products. The docket indicates plaintiffs Bridget Erickson and Erica Stevenson filed an amended complaint, and the court recently granted Kimberly-Clark's motion to dismiss that complaint. The specific product or alleged misrepresentation is not detailed in the docket text.

Filed
October 7, 2024
Represents
Bridget Erickson, Erica Stevenson
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Flumgio Technology Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action against Flumgio Technology Inc., apparently alleging fraud. The specific conduct is not described in the docket text, but the case was filed under the federal 'other fraud' nature of suit. The docket indicates the parties later reached a settlement and the case was voluntarily dismissed with prejudice.

Filed
October 4, 2024
Represents
Michael Donalya, Jordan Sanders
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

Martinez v. Choose Your Horizon - Privacy Data Disclosure Settlement

Choose Your Horizon, Inc., a ketamine therapy provider, allegedly disclosed customers' confidential and protected health information to third parties in violation of California privacy law through its websites. The defendant denies liability but agreed to settle to avoid further legal costs and uncertainty.

Settlement fund
$400,000
Claim deadline
April 23, 2026
Represents
Karen Martinez, Eli Silva
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

Joyous PBC Ketamine Therapy Privacy Settlement

Joyous, PBC, a ketamine therapy provider, allegedly disclosed customers' confidential information to third parties in violation of California privacy law. Joyous denies liability but settled the case to avoid additional legal fees and litigation uncertainty.

Settlement fund
$400,000
Claim deadline
November 24, 2025
Represents
Jane Doe
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

Los Angeles Times Privacy Tracker Settlement

Los Angeles Times Communications LLC installed and used three trackers—TripleLift Tracker, GumGum Tracker, and Audiencerate Tracker—on website visitors' internet browsers without consent, allegedly violating California's Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA). The company has agreed to settle the class action lawsuit.

Claim deadline
May 20, 2026
Represents
Taliah Mirmalek
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

GameSpot CIPA Settlement

Fandom, Inc. allegedly installed and used three trackers (GumGum Tracker, Audiencerate Tracker, and TripleLift Tracker) on GameSpot website visitors' internet browsers without consent, in violation of California's Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA).

Claim deadline
April 16, 2026
Represents
Vishal Shah, Jayden Kim

“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.