Lauren Nicole Vega
Ferraro Vega Employment Lawyers, Inc.
- Address of record
- 3333 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 300, San Diego, CA 92108, 619-693-4307
- Phone
- (619) 693-4307
Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.
Case history
Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.
Martin Marietta Materials Labor Class Action
This is a proposed class action against Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., apparently concerning labor or employment-related claims. The case was removed to federal court in the Southern District of California. The available docket text does not include the specific allegations in the complaint.
- Filed
- October 1, 2026
- Represents
- Shayna Hill
Hill v. Martin Marietta Materials Labor Class Action
This proposed class action alleges unspecified labor law violations by Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. The case was filed as a labor matter under federal jurisdiction, suggesting claims potentially affecting multiple employees or workers associated with the defendant.
- Filed
- August 7, 2026
- Represents
- Shayna Hill
Honeywell Employment Class Action
A proposed class action against Honeywell International Inc, apparently concerning labor or employment practices. The nature of suit is 'Labor: Other,' suggesting claims on behalf of employees, but specific allegations are not available from the docket.
- Filed
- May 27, 2025
- Represents
- Peter Leverman
DeVry University Employment Class Action
This is a proposed class action against DeVry University, Inc., apparently concerning employment-related civil rights claims. The docket indicates the plaintiff moved to remand the case to state court and the defendant moved to consolidate related cases; no specific allegations are detailed in the available text.
- Filed
- December 26, 2024
- Represents
- Delainya Bell
Marathon Petroleum Labor Class Action
A proposed class action against Marathon Petroleum Company LP, apparently concerning labor or employment practices. The case is in the Southern District of California under the Labor: Other nature of suit, and the parties have sought stays for mediation and pending approval of a settlement in a related Superior Court action. Specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket entries.
- Filed
- December 13, 2024
- Represents
- Charlie Martinez
Jeld-Wen Labor Class Action
A proposed class action against Jeld-Wen, Inc., apparently concerning labor or employment practices. The nature of suit is listed as 'Labor: Other,' but the docket text does not provide specific allegations. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts and not yet a settlement.
- Filed
- June 27, 2024
- Represents
- Gabriel Gonzalez
Bandon Fitness Employment Class Action
A proposed class action against Bandon Fitness (Texas), Inc., apparently concerning employment-related civil rights claims, as indicated by Nature of Suit 442 Civil Rights: Jobs. The docket does not detail the specific allegations, but the case was removed from state court and later remanded by joint motion.
- Filed
- June 6, 2024
- Represents
- Michael Osley Jr.
Unio Health Partners Labor Class Action
A proposed class action against Unio Health Partners, LLC, apparently concerning employment or labor claims under California law, based on a case removed from state court. The allegations are not yet proven and no settlement has been reached.
- Filed
- May 31, 2024
- Represents
- Emilie Hanne
Cintas Labor Class Action
A proposed class action against Cintas Corporation No. 3, apparently concerning labor or employment practices. The nature of suit is listed as 'Labor: Other'. No further details are available from the caption and docket text.
- Filed
- May 28, 2024
- Represents
- Damian A. Castro
Daikin Comfort Technologies Employment Class Action
A proposed class action against Daikin Comfort Technologies Manufacturing, L.P., apparently concerning workplace civil rights or employment practices. The nature-of-suit code indicates a 'Civil Rights: Jobs' case, suggesting allegations related to employee rights. The docket reflects a joint motion to dismiss, indicating the parties may have settled, and the allegations have not been adjudicated.
- Filed
- April 26, 2024
- Represents
- Melissa Placentia
“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.