CClaimWatch
Plaintiff counsel in 10 cases

Michael Francis Ram

Morgan & Morgan Mass Tort Dept.

Address of record
1390 Market Street, Suite 200, San Francisco, CA 94102, 628-267-1537
Email
MRam@forthepeople.com
Phone
(628) 267-1537

Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.

11
Cases tracked
10 active · 1 settled
$3.5M
Plaintiff-side recovery
Disclosed settlement funds
—
Defense-side exposure
Resolved in settlements
1
Cases with values
of 11 tracked

Case history

Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.

Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Meta AI Glasses Class Action

A proposed class action against Meta concerning alleged fraud related to AI glasses products. The case was filed under a fraud nature of suit, suggesting claims that consumers or purchasers may have been deceived regarding the AI glasses or their capabilities.

Filed
March 4, 2026
Represents
Boylett Jeffrey
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Alexander v. DoorDash Class Action

This proposed class action names DoorDash, Inc. as a defendant, though the specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket information. Based on the nature of suit code (890 Other Statutory Actions), the case appears to concern alleged statutory violations potentially affecting DoorDash users or workers, but the exact nature of the claims cannot be determined from the filing metadata alone.

Filed
November 26, 2025
Represents
Charles Alexander
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Kriseman v. General Motors Vehicle Defect Class Action

A proposed class action against General Motors alleging defects in vehicles sold or leased to consumers. The nature of suit code suggests claims involving personal property damage or breach of warranty related to automotive products.

Filed
October 28, 2025
Represents
Rick Kriseman, Kerry Kriseman
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

PayActiv Data Breach Class Action

A proposed class action alleges that PayActiv, Inc. suffered a data breach that compromised personal information of its users or customers. The case involves claims related to the breach, apparently concerning improper handling of sensitive data and the resulting harm to consumers whose information was exposed.

Filed
October 3, 2025
Represents
Jessenia Gomez
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Ramirez v. Plex Class Action

This proposed class action was filed against Plex, Inc. in Northern District of California. The nature of suit is classified as "Other Statutory Actions," but without access to the complaint or docket entries, the specific allegations cannot be determined from the caption alone.

Filed
September 16, 2025
Represents
David Ramirez
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Nolan v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

This proposed class action against Farmers Insurance Exchange alleges unspecified statutory violations, as indicated by the 'Other Statutory Actions' nature of suit. Without access to the complaint details, the specific allegations cannot be determined, but the caption and court filing suggest a dispute involving insurance practices that may affect multiple policyholders or account holders.

Filed
September 5, 2025
Represents
Laura June Nolan
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Salesforce Customers Security Incident Class Action

This proposed class action alleges that Salesforce experienced a security incident affecting its customers. The lawsuit apparently concerns unauthorized access to or compromise of customer data stored on Salesforce's systems. Customers seek relief for damages allegedly arising from the company's handling of the security breach.

Filed
August 27, 2025
Represents
Laura June Nolan
CounselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Tea Dating Advice Data Breach Class Action

This proposed class action alleges that Tea Dating Advice, a dating advice service or platform, experienced a data breach that compromised personal information of its users. Ordinary consumers who used the service and had their data exposed may be class members. The case involves claims related to the unauthorized disclosure of users' personal or sensitive information.

Filed
July 28, 2025
Represents
Jane Doe
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Boar's Head Provisions Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action was filed against Boar's Head Provisions Co., Inc. The lawsuit appears to assert fraud claims under nature-of-suit code 370 (Other Fraud), likely on behalf of consumers. The docket text does not specify the exact product or conduct at issue.

Filed
October 21, 2024
Represents
Robby Harper
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Management Association Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action by the Riva on the River Homeowners Association against The Management Association, Inc., apparently concerning fraud. The court recently denied a motion for class certification and dismissed certain claims with leave to amend.

Filed
October 9, 2024
Represents
Riva on the River Homeowners Association
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

Evenflo Big Kid Booster Seat Settlement

Evenflo allegedly misled consumers by labeling and advertising its "Big Kid" booster seats as "side impact tested" and safe for children weighing 30 pounds or more, when the company claims the labeling and advertising was not misleading and denies any wrongdoing. The parties settled to avoid the cost and risk of continued litigation.

Settlement fund
$3.5M
Claim deadline
November 24, 2025
Represents
Andrew Gladstone, Karen Sanchez, Georgette Gladstone, Teresa Muga

“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.