CClaimWatch
In litigation — no settlement yetprivacydata breach

Tea Dating Advice Data Breach Class Action

Verified September 19, 2026Found via the federal court docketHow ClaimWatch verifies cases

Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.

Where this case stands

In litigation

The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.

Pending in the District Court, N.D. California (No. 3:25-cv-06321).

  1. July 28, 2025
    Case filed

What happened

This proposed class action alleges that Tea Dating Advice, a dating advice service or platform, experienced a data breach that compromised personal information of its users. Ordinary consumers who used the service and had their data exposed may be class members. The case involves claims related to the unauthorized disclosure of users' personal or sensitive information.

Do you qualify?

No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.

How to file

There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.

Common questions

Can I file a claim in the Tea Dating Advice Data Breach Class Action case?
No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed July 28, 2025 in the District Court, N.D. California (No. 3:25-cv-06321).What a class action lawsuit is →
Who are the attorneys in the Tea Dating Advice Data Breach Class Action?
For the plaintiffs: Sarper Unal (Ahdoot & Wolfson, PC); Melissa Ryan Clark (Ahdoot & Wolfson, PC); Shauna Itri (Seeger Weiss LLP); Matthew John Langley (Almeida Law Group LLC). For Tea Dating Advice: Alexis Bastian Cruz (Baker & Hostetler LLP); Kenneth Michael Trujillo-Jamison (Willenken LLP); Eileen M. Ahern (Willenken LLP); Kamran Benjamin Ahmadian (Baker & Hostetler LLP). From the public court docket.

Who's involved

Plaintiffs

  • Jane Doe 21
  • Polina Korennikova(Consol Plaintiff)
  • Charlotte Vargas(Consol Plaintiff)
  • Kristi Stevens(Consol Plaintiff)
  • Jarell Brown(Consol Plaintiff)
  • Celeste Jones(Consol Plaintiff)
  • Jane Doe 19
  • Jane Doe 2

+ 19 more

Defendants

  • X CORP.(Consol Defendant)
  • Tea Dating Advice, Inc.

Counsel for plaintiffs

Counsel for defendants

Other cases these firms appear in

From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.

Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member

Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.

More privacy settlements

View all →
November 9, 2026privacy

Forbes Media Website Tracker Class Action Settlement

Pro rata payments from the Settlement Fund after deductions for administration costs, court-awarded attorneys' fees and costs, and incentive awards

November 12, 2026data breach

American Vision Partners Data Breach Settlement

Pro-rata cash payments or out-of-pocket expense claims for Damages Settlement Class Members

November 25, 2026No proof neededprivacy

Skin360 BIPA Settlement

Equal payment to all valid claimants from the $4.7 million Settlement Fund, minus Settlement Administrator costs, attorneys' fees (up to one-third of the fund), and service payments to Class Representatives (up to $5,000 each)

December 7, 2026privacy

Wayne Memorial Hospital Data Breach Settlement