CClaimWatch
Plaintiff counsel in 37 cases

Tina Wolfson

Ahdoot & Wolfson, PC

Address of record
2600 W. Olive Avenue, Suite 500, Burbank, CA 91505, 310-474-9111
Email
twolfson@ahdootwolfson.com
Phone
(310) 474-9111
Fax
Fax 310-474-8585

Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.

39
Cases tracked
33 active · 6 settled
$126M
Plaintiff-side recovery
Disclosed settlement funds
—
Defense-side exposure
Resolved in settlements
3
Cases with values
of 39 tracked

Case history

Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.

Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Educational Testing Service Class Action

A proposed class action against Educational Testing Service, apparently concerning claims under a federal statute classified as '890 Other Statutory Actions.' The docket entry does not provide further specifics about the allegations, which are not proven.

Filed
October 17, 2026
Represents
PL 01
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Shelby Wolfe v. Amgen Data Breach Class Action

This proposed class action against Amgen, Inc. alleges harm related to a data incident or privacy matter affecting ordinary individuals. The specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket information, but the nature-of-suit code and defendant profile suggest potential exposure of personal information or privacy violations affecting consumers or patients.

Filed
August 7, 2026
Represents
Shelby Wolfe
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Clark v. Centene Corporation

A proposed class action against Centene Corporation and Health Net LLC concerning an alleged contract dispute. The nature of suit is listed as "Contract: Other," though the specific allegations are not detailed in the docket entries provided, which contain only procedural orders regarding attorney admissions.

Filed
August 3, 2026
Represents
Howard Clark, Jr.
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Mason v. American Honda Motor Co. Class Action

A proposed class action against American Honda Motor Co., Inc. alleging fraud. The lawsuit was filed in federal court in California and references a related case, suggesting potential coordination or overlapping claims involving the automotive manufacturer and its consumers.

Filed
July 16, 2026
Represents
Beverly Mason
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

TikTok User Privacy Class Action (Mortazi)

A proposed class action filed by Sean Mortazi against TikTok Inc., apparently concerning user privacy or data practices on the platform. The nature-of-suit code suggests a statutory claim not easily classified under traditional categories. Without access to the complaint details, the specific allegations cannot be determined from the docket information alone.

Filed
June 11, 2026
Represents
Sean Mortazi
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

JetBlue Airways Consumer Class Action

A proposed class action against JetBlue Airways Corporation has been filed in federal court. The specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket information, though the nature of suit designation suggests claims arising under federal statute. The case appears to involve issues potentially affecting airline passengers or consumers.

Filed
June 10, 2026
Represents
David Coyne
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Brenman v. Kia America Product Liability Class Action

This proposed class action alleges a product liability claim against Kia America, Inc. Based on the case caption and nature of suit, the lawsuit apparently concerns a defect or safety issue with one or more Kia vehicles. The specific allegations and scope of the putative class are not detailed in the available docket information.

Filed
June 3, 2026
Represents
Marc Brenman
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Jones v. Shein US Services Data Breach Class Action

A proposed class action against Shein US Services, LLC alleging consumer harm apparently related to a data breach or privacy violation involving ordinary customers. The case was filed in federal court and the plaintiff seeks to relate it to a prior similar action against Shein, suggesting a pattern of alleged wrongdoing affecting multiple consumers.

Filed
May 27, 2026
Represents
Ashley Jones
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

EssilorLuxottica USA Inc. Fraud or Truth-In-Lending Class Action

A proposed class action against EssilorLuxottica USA Inc. and related entities, apparently concerning fraud or truth-in-lending issues. The case has been consolidated with a related action, and the plaintiff has been granted leave to file a consolidated complaint alleging unspecified violations related to eyewear products or lending practices.

Filed
May 8, 2026
Represents
Xochilt Smith
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Shein US Services Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action alleging fraud against Shein US Services LLC and related entities. The docket indicates multiple named plaintiffs have filed a motion to appoint interim leadership counsel, though the specific factual allegations cannot be determined from the docket entries, which appear to primarily address procedural matters and case management.

Filed
May 5, 2026
Represents
Ashley Jones
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Walsh v. Chime Financial Class Action

A proposed class action filed against Chime Financial, Inc., a financial services company. The complaint is classified under "Personal Property: Other" and appears to involve claims by account holders or consumers, though specific allegations cannot be determined from the docket metadata alone.

Filed
April 17, 2026
Represents
Michael Walsh
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Stearns v. Meta Platforms Data/Contract Class Action

A proposed class action against Meta Platforms alleging breach of contract. Based on the limited docket information available, the case appears to involve contractual claims, though the specific nature of the alleged breach cannot be determined from the caption and nature-of-suit code alone.

Filed
March 13, 2026
Represents
Peter Tittl
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Desouvre v. Disney Worldwide Services Inc.

A proposed class action has been filed against Disney Worldwide Services Inc. in federal court. Based on the nature of suit designation, this appears to involve statutory claims, though the specific allegations cannot be determined from the caption and docket information provided.

Filed
March 10, 2026
Represents
Jane Doe (A Minor), E.K. (A Minor), S.K. (A Minor), Veronika Pikeeva, J.D. (A Minor), Ashley Popa, C.R. (A Minor), Kimberly Sobalvarro
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Meta AI Glasses Class Action

A proposed class action against Meta concerning alleged fraud related to AI glasses products. The case was filed under a fraud nature of suit, suggesting claims that consumers or purchasers may have been deceived regarding the AI glasses or their capabilities.

Filed
March 4, 2026
Represents
Peter Tittl, Jeffry Woodhead, Jason Hatch, Rickford Fraser, Daniel Doerr, James Diedrich, Kristi Stewart, PL19, PL04, Benita Williams, PL09, PL31, PL18, PL05, PL17, PL35, Breandan Dawson, PL16, PL01, PL36, PL27, Elvis Dezarn, PL02, Mike Miller, PL25, PL38, PL30, PL37, PL43, PL41, Angela Ruiz Lopez, PL11, Ryanna Hardman, PL22, PL10, Kevin Russi, Chelasty Yancy, PL32, PL42, PL07, PL14, PL29, PL44, PL12, Russell-Phillip Bodine, Sahilpreet Singh, Kathleen Decker, PL26, Favian Aver Galindo, PL28, PL23, PL20, PL24, PL33, PL13, Jaipaul Sukhai, PL15, Elizabeth Lewis, PL06, PL03, PL39, PL40, PL34, PL08, PL21, Dijjean Johnson, Antonio Enriquez, Steven Beltran, Alicia Perez, Terrance Moore
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Under Armour Consumer Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against Under Armour, Inc. in federal court. While specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket information, the case appears to involve consumer claims against the athletic apparel company. Further details regarding the nature of the claims would require access to the complaint itself.

Filed
November 24, 2025
Represents
David Freifeld, Steven Boyle
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Hyundai AutoEver America Class Action

A proposed class action filed against Hyundai AutoEver America, LLC. While the specific claims are not detailed in the available docket information, the case appears to involve alleged statutory violations relating to the automotive industry or services provided by Hyundai AutoEver America.

Filed
November 13, 2025
Represents
Steven Haynes
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Thele v. Google LLC

A proposed class action against Google LLC was filed in the Northern District of California. The specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket information, though the nature of suit code suggests a statutory claim outside the standard federal question or diversity categories. Without access to the complaint or initial docket entries, the precise nature of the claims cannot be determined from the caption alone.

Filed
November 11, 2025
Represents
Thomas Thele, Melo Porter
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

S.K. v. Disney Worldwide Services Data Breach Class Action

A proposed class action against Disney Worldwide Services Inc., apparently concerning alleged mishandling or unauthorized access to personal information. The case was filed as a personal injury action, suggesting claims of harm arising from alleged privacy violations or data exposure affecting consumers.

Filed
September 5, 2025
Represents
S. K., E. K., C. R., Jane Doe, Veronika Pikeeva, Ashley Popa, J. D., Kimberly Sobalvarro
CounselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Nolan v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

This proposed class action against Farmers Insurance Exchange alleges unspecified statutory violations, as indicated by the 'Other Statutory Actions' nature of suit. Without access to the complaint details, the specific allegations cannot be determined, but the caption and court filing suggest a dispute involving insurance practices that may affect multiple policyholders or account holders.

Filed
September 5, 2025
Represents
Malcolm Scott
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Salesforce Customers Security Incident Class Action

This proposed class action alleges that Salesforce experienced a security incident affecting its customers. The lawsuit apparently concerns unauthorized access to or compromise of customer data stored on Salesforce's systems. Customers seek relief for damages allegedly arising from the company's handling of the security breach.

Filed
August 27, 2025
Represents
Malcolm Scott, Quinn Swearingen
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Farmers Security Incident Class Action

This proposed class action concerns an alleged security incident involving Farmers, apparently affecting personal information of customers or policyholders. The case appears to involve claims related to data protection and privacy violations arising from the security breach.

Filed
August 24, 2025
Represents
Phyllis Garrison, Josko Smolcic, Bobbie Jo Geelen, Michael McCulloch, Dawn Harris, Christina Scorio, Jacqulyn McGlynn, Roland Plude, Malcolm Scott
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Coinbase Customer Data Security Breach Class Action

This proposed class action concerns an alleged data security breach affecting Coinbase customers. The litigation apparently alleges that Coinbase failed to adequately protect customer data, exposing personal information to unauthorized access. Ordinary cryptocurrency account holders and other customers appear positioned as potential class members.

Filed
August 13, 2025
Represents
Allen Shakib, Christopher McGuire, Julian Okuyiga, Susan Byrns, Michael Gonzalez
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Tea Dating Advice Data Breach Class Action

This proposed class action alleges that Tea Dating Advice, a dating advice service or platform, experienced a data breach that compromised personal information of its users. Ordinary consumers who used the service and had their data exposed may be class members. The case involves claims related to the unauthorized disclosure of users' personal or sensitive information.

Filed
July 28, 2025
Represents
Jane Doe 9, Jane Doe 12, Jane Doe 13, Jane Doe 14, Jane Doe 3, Jane Doe 20, Jane Doe 5, Jane Doe 16, Jane Doe 11, Jane Doe 15, Jane Doe 10, Jane Doe 7, Jane Doe 18, Jane Doe 17, Jane Doe 6, Jane Doe 8, Jane Doe 4, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 19, Jane Doe 21, Jane Doe
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Meta Android Privacy Class Action

A proposed class action against Meta Platforms, Inc., apparently concerning privacy issues related to its Android applications or services. The docket shows plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint, Meta moved to dismiss it, and one plaintiff voluntarily dismissed his individual claims. Specific factual allegations are not detailed in the available docket text beyond the case caption.

Filed
June 3, 2025
Represents
Devin Rose, Hayden Lee, John Ginder, Yolanda Cunningham, Bert Velilla
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Magnite Privacy Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against Magnite, Inc. by plaintiff Lisa Tsering. The nature of suit is listed as P.I.: Other, which often includes privacy-related claims, though the docket text does not specify the exact allegations. The case is in its early stages, with the parties stipulating to extend the defendant's time to respond to the complaint.

Filed
May 29, 2025
Represents
Lisa Tsering, Ariel Gilligan, Logan Mitchell, Marc Russo, Dilara Uskup
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

TaskUs Consumer Class Action

A proposed class action was filed against TaskUs, Inc. in the Southern District of New York. The case appears to concern personal-property and potentially privacy-related claims, based on the docket caption and nature of suit. These are allegations only; no settlement has been reached.

Filed
May 27, 2025
Represents
Nelson Estrada, Allen Joo, tiba parsa, Craig Burson, Tim Reynolds
CounselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Magnite Class Action

A proposed class action against Magnite, Inc., filed in the Central District of California. The case is docketed under 'Other Statutory Actions,' and the provided caption and docket entries do not specify the alleged violations. The lawsuit appears to be brought on behalf of a class of ordinary consumers, but the specific claims are not described in the available metadata; the allegations have not been proven and no settlement is described in the provided entries.

Filed
April 18, 2025
Represents
Lisa Tsering, Ariel Gilligan, Logan Mitchell, Marc Russo, Dilara Uskup
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

GoodRx and Pharmacy Benefit Manager Antitrust Class Action

This appears to be a proposed class action against GoodRx and pharmacy benefit managers, apparently alleging antitrust violations. The case was recently filed, and the docket does not yet provide details of the alleged conduct, but it may concern pricing or competition issues affecting consumers of prescription drugs.

Filed
April 17, 2025
Represents
AIDS Healthcare Foundation
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

GoodRx Prescription Drug Discount Antitrust Class Action

A proposed class action against GoodRx and several pharmacy benefit managers, apparently alleging anticompetitive conduct related to prescription drug pricing or discount services. The plaintiff, AIDS Healthcare Foundation, may be seeking to represent purchasers of prescription drugs who paid higher prices as a result of the alleged conduct. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts and not yet a settlement.

Filed
April 16, 2025
Represents
AIDS Healthcare Foundation
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

PowerSchool Customer Data Breach Class Action

A proposed class action against PowerSchool Holdings, Inc. and PowerSchool Group, LLC, apparently concerning a customer data security breach. The case is pending as multidistrict litigation, and the allegations likely relate to the companies' handling of customer personal information.

Filed
April 8, 2025
Represents
Jonna Schwartz
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

STIIIZY Data Breach Settlement

STIIIZY, Inc. experienced a data breach in October 2024 where personal information and private health information was allegedly accessed, compromised, or stolen from the company's servers. The breach was announced on January 7, 2025. STIIIZY denies the allegations and all liability.

Claim deadline
September 10, 2026
Represents
Lorenzo Montoya
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Permian Resources Oil Antitrust Class Action

A proposed class action against Permian Resources Corp. and other oil and gas producers, apparently alleging antitrust violations. The case was transferred to the District of New Mexico as part of multidistrict litigation. The plaintiff, Gustave Link, appears to claim that the defendant companies colluded to restrain trade, possibly affecting consumers who purchase oil or gasoline.

Filed
August 16, 2024
Represents
Gustave Link
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Continental Resources Shale Oil Antitrust Class Action

This is a proposed class action against Continental Resources, Inc. and other shale oil producers, apparently alleging antitrust violations related to shale oil production or pricing. The case is part of multidistrict litigation, and the docket indicates that jurisdictional discovery is underway regarding the defendants' personal jurisdiction challenges.

Filed
August 15, 2024
Represents
Gustave Link
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Consumer Vehicle Driving Data Tracking Collection Class Action

This appears to be a multidistrict litigation consolidating proposed class actions concerning the tracking and collection of consumer vehicle driving data. Docket entries reference consumer reporting agencies and the Fair Credit Reporting Act, suggesting claims may involve the disclosure of consumer report information. These are allegations in a pending case and have not been proven.

Filed
June 7, 2024
Represents
Susan Clingerman, Brent Rish, Jariya Thongsawang
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

MOVEit Customer Data Security Breach Settlement

Cadence Bank used a third-party file transfer application called MOVEit Transfer that had a security vulnerability. This vulnerability led to a data breach between May 28, 2023 and May 31, 2023, where personally identifying information of customers was compromised. Cadence began notifying affected individuals in September 2023.

Claim deadline
June 4, 2026
Represents
Christopher Pipes
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

MOVEit Nuance Data Security Breach Settlement

Nuance Communications, Inc. experienced a data security breach between May 27-31, 2023, affecting personally identifiable information of customers. The breach resulted from an alleged vulnerability in MOVEit Transfer, third-party file transfer software that Nuance used in its ordinary business operations. Nuance is settling claims related to this 2023 MOVEit Security Incident, though litigation against Progress Software Corporation (the MOVEit software licensor) continues.

Claim deadline
March 30, 2026
Represents
Christopher Pipes
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

Robinhood Order Flow Settlement

Robinhood allegedly routed customer market orders for equities in a manner that resulted in execution prices worse than the National Best Bid/Offer. Customers' buy orders were executed at prices higher than the best available offer, and sell orders were executed at prices lower than the best available bid. Robinhood denies all allegations of liability or wrongdoing.

Settlement fund
$2M
Claim deadline
July 13, 2026
Represents
Justin William Lemon, Ji Kwon
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

ZF-TRW Airbag Control Units Settlement

Consumer plaintiffs allege that defective Airbag Control Units manufactured by ZF-TRW and installed in approximately 12.3 million vehicles may cause airbags to fail to inflate in the event of a crash. The defendants have agreed to settle the litigation, with separate settlements reached with Toyota, Mitsubishi, and preliminary approval granted for Hyundai and Kia settlements totaling over $62 million.

Settlement fund
$62M
Claim deadline
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

ZF-TRW Airbag Control Units Products Liability Settlement

Consumer plaintiffs allege that defective Airbag Control Units in approximately 12.3 million vehicles may cause airbags to fail to inflate in the event of a crash. Settlements have been reached with multiple vehicle manufacturers including Toyota, Mitsubishi, Hyundai, and Kia.

Settlement fund
$62M
Claim deadline
Represents
Matthew Aquino

“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.