SHAUNA BRIE ITRI
Seeger Weiss LLP
- Address of record
- 325 Chestnut Street, Ste 917, Philadelphia, PA 19106, 267-973-4265
- Phone
- (267) 973-4265
Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.
Case history
Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.
Cognizant and TriZetto Data Security Breach Class Action
This proposed class action alleges that Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation and TriZetto Provider Solutions, LLC experienced a data security breach. Based on the multidistrict litigation (MDL) designation and nature of suit coding, the case apparently involves claims by individuals whose personal information may have been compromised in the breach. The specific details of affected parties and data types are not available from the docket metadata provided.
- Filed
- June 5, 2026
- Represents
- Liam Lytle, Maricruz Jimenez, Carson Noel
Marquis Software Solutions Data Breach Class Action
This proposed class action concerns an alleged data breach at Marquis Software Solutions, Inc. The lawsuit alleges that personal information of class members was compromised. Affected individuals are seeking recovery for damages and relief related to the unauthorized disclosure of their data.
- Filed
- November 21, 2025
- Represents
- Michelle Jinks
Conduent Business Services Data Breach Class Action
A proposed class action alleges that Conduent Business Services experienced a data breach that compromised personal information of individuals. The lawsuit apparently concerns alleged failures to adequately protect sensitive data and alleged harm to class members whose information was exposed in the breach.
- Filed
- October 27, 2025
- Represents
- ALEN DYMARSKY
Tea Dating Advice Consumer Contract Class Action
A proposed class action alleges that Tea Dating Advice, Inc. breached a contract with consumers. Based on the limited docket information available, the case apparently concerns contractual disputes between the company and its customers, though specific allegations regarding the nature of the breach are not provided in the available metadata.
- Filed
- August 8, 2025
- Represents
- Polina Korennikova
Tea Dating Advice Data Breach Class Action
This proposed class action alleges that Tea Dating Advice, a dating advice service or platform, experienced a data breach that compromised personal information of its users. Ordinary consumers who used the service and had their data exposed may be class members. The case involves claims related to the unauthorized disclosure of users' personal or sensitive information.
- Filed
- July 28, 2025
- Represents
- Polina Korennikova
Nokia Employee Benefits Class Action
This is a proposed class action against Nokia of America Corporation and related defendants, apparently involving claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) on behalf of participants or beneficiaries in Nokia employee benefit plans. The initial docket entries are procedural and do not yet state the specific alleged violations.
- Filed
- July 18, 2025
- Represents
- JAMES SIMS, ANTONIO SMITH
Angeion Group Class Action
A proposed class action against Angeion Group LLC. The provided docket text does not describe the underlying allegations; it only reflects procedural filings in multidistrict litigation. The nature of the plaintiffs' claims is not stated in the caption or docket entries; these are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts and not yet a settlement.
- Filed
- April 24, 2025
- Represents
- TYLER BAKER, LAUREN WOLF
PowerSchool Customer Data Breach Class Action
A proposed class action against PowerSchool Holdings, Inc. and PowerSchool Group, LLC, apparently concerning a customer data security breach. The case is pending as multidistrict litigation, and the allegations likely relate to the companies' handling of customer personal information.
- Filed
- April 8, 2025
- Represents
- J.R., B.R.
AT&T Class Action
A proposed class action against AT&T Inc, apparently concerning personal injury or other harm, based on the nature of suit 'P.I.: Other'. The specific allegations are not detailed in the available caption and docket text. These are allegations in a newly filed case and not proven facts.
- Filed
- October 16, 2024
- Represents
- Cindy Wallace
Cencora/The Lash Group Data Security Incident Settlement
On February 27, 2024, Cencora disclosed that its information systems had been improperly accessed by unknown parties. The data breach exposed Personal Information including names, addresses, Social Security numbers, health and insurance information, financial account information, and other sensitive data. Cencora has agreed to pay $40,000,000 and implement enhanced data and information security measures to resolve claims arising from this incident.
- Settlement fund
- $40M
- Claim deadline
- January 19, 2026
- Represents
- JAMES SOWARD
AT&T Data Breach Settlement
AT&T announced two data incidents: on March 30, 2024, AT&T-specific data fields were found on the dark web (AT&T 1 Data Incident); and on July 12, 2024, limited data was illegally downloaded from an AT&T workspace on a Snowflake cloud platform (AT&T 2 Data Incident). The data exposed included names, addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses, dates of birth, account passcodes, billing account numbers, Social Security numbers, and call interaction data. AT&T settled the consolidated lawsuits without admitting liability or wrongdoing.
- Claim deadline
- December 18, 2025
- Represents
- Plaintiffs' Executive Committee
HandsFreeLink Class Action Settlement
Plaintiffs claim that American Honda Motor Co., Inc. failed to disclose a defect in the HandsFreeLink hands-free calling system offered in certain Acura vehicles (2004-2008 TL, 2005-2008 MDX, and 2007-2009 RDX models). Plaintiffs allege this defect caused them out-of-pocket losses and other damages. Honda denies all allegations and wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid litigation costs and uncertainties.
- Claim deadline
- May 30, 2024
- Represents
- Yun-Fei Lou, Lindsey Aberin, Don Awtrey, John Kelly, Jeff Aberin, Joy Matza, Charles Burgess
“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.