CClaimWatch
Plaintiff counsel in 11 cases

Nick Suciu , III

Bryson Harris Suciu & DeMay PLLC

Address of record
6905 Telegraph Rd., Suite 115, Bloomfield Hills, MI 48301, 616-678-2180
Email
nsuciu@brysonpllc.com
Phone
(616) 678-2180

Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.

11
Cases tracked
10 active · 1 settled
$31.5M
Plaintiff-side recovery
Disclosed settlement funds
—
Defense-side exposure
Resolved in settlements
1
Cases with values
of 11 tracked

Case history

Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.

Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Fedoroff v. Rocket Mortgage Class Action

A proposed class action against Rocket Mortgage, LLC concerning alleged practices related to mortgage lending or loan servicing. The case was transferred from the Northern District of California to the Eastern District of Michigan, and the defendant filed a motion to dismiss, which is currently pending briefing.

Filed
June 16, 2026
Represents
Gary Fedoroff
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Knox v. Chobani Data Breach or Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action against Chobani, LLC alleging fraud. The case has been consolidated with other related cases, and the court has appointed a plaintiffs' executive committee to oversee litigation. Based on the nature of suit code and consolidation of multiple cases, this appears to involve allegations that consumers were defrauded in connection with Chobani products or services, though the specific factual allegations cannot be determined from the docket entry alone.

Filed
June 16, 2026
Represents
Hale Knox
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Gouldbourne v. Huel Inc. Fraud or Truth-In-Lending Class Action

A proposed class action against Huel Inc. alleging fraud or violations of truth-in-lending laws. The case was transferred from the Southern District of New York and involves allegations concerning the company's lending or consumer transaction practices, though specific details of the claims are not provided in the available docket entries.

Filed
May 5, 2026
Represents
Jessica Gouldbourne
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Crow v. Topco Associates Data Breach Class Action

This proposed class action against Topco Associates, LLC, apparently concerns a data breach or privacy-related injury affecting consumers. Based on the nature-of-suit code for personal injury (other), the complaint likely alleges unauthorized access to or misuse of personal information affecting ordinary consumers or customers.

Filed
January 14, 2026
Represents
Shelby Crow
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

CCell Cannabis Vaporizer Products Antitrust Class Action

A proposed class action alleges that CCell engaged in anticompetitive conduct related to its closed cannabis oil vaporization systems and components. The lawsuit appears to concern pricing, distribution, or other allegedly illegal competitive practices affecting consumers who purchased these vaporization products.

Filed
October 6, 2025
Represents
B. Z.
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

RYOBI Power Washer Class Action

This proposed class action alleges fraud related to RYOBI power washers. The complaint apparently concerns defects, misrepresentations, or other fraudulent conduct affecting purchasers of the company's power washer products. Details of the specific allegations are not available from the docket metadata provided.

Filed
September 2, 2025
Represents
Keith Custer
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Jamison v. Polygroup North America Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against Polygroup North America, Inc. in federal court. Based on the case caption and nature of suit, the allegations apparently concern consumer-related statutory claims, though specific details about the product, alleged defect, or consumer harm are not available from the docket metadata provided.

Filed
August 26, 2025
Represents
Brandi Jamison
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Shenzhen Smoore Antitrust Class Action

A proposed class action was filed against Shenzhen Smoore Technology Company, Ltd. and other defendants. The case is docketed as an antitrust matter (Nature of Suit 410), and the named defendants appear to be companies involved in the vaping or e-cigarette products industry. Specific allegations are not detailed in the docket text, but the filing appears to assert anticompetitive conduct.

Filed
July 2, 2025
Represents
B.Z.
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Better Living Brands Consumer Fraud Class Action

Mary Tomassian filed a proposed class action against Better Living Brands, LLC in the Northern District of California. The lawsuit asserts claims for fraud (Nature of Suit 370), apparently concerning allegedly deceptive or fraudulent conduct involving Better Living Brands' products or services. The docket indicates the case was later dismissed by joint stipulation.

Filed
June 18, 2025
Represents
Mary Tomassian
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Grimmway Product Recall Class Action

This proposed class action against Grimmway Enterprises, Inc. apparently concerns a recalled food product. The plaintiff alleges he purchased and consumed the product without incident, and that the product was subject to a recall. These are allegations only, not proven facts.

Filed
November 19, 2024
Represents
Wayne Catalano
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

Flagstar Data Breach Settlement

Flagstar Bank suffered two data breaches in January 2021 and December 2021 that exposed the personal information of approximately 2.2 million individuals. The bank is paying to settle claims related to these breaches, though Flagstar denies wrongdoing and admits no liability.

Settlement fund
$31.5M
Claim deadline
August 11, 2026
Represents
Christopher McKenney, Paulette Kincaide

“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.