Victor J. Sandoval
Almeida Law Group LLC
- Address of record
- 3415 S. Sepulveda Boulevard, Suite 1121, Los Angeles, CA 90034, (562) 534-5907
- Phone
- (562) 534-5907
Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.
Case history
Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.
Pandiscia v. Twitch Interactive Class Action
A proposed class action has been filed against Twitch Interactive, Inc. in federal court. While specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket entries, the case appears to concern claims that could affect Twitch users or account holders. The nature of the lawsuit will become clearer upon review of the full complaint.
- Filed
- August 20, 2026
- Represents
- Warren Pandiscia
Wilce v. Willow Health Services Class Action
A proposed class action filed by Kristy Wilce against Willow Health Services, Inc. The specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket entries, but given the nature of the defendant as a health services provider, the case apparently concerns claims arising from healthcare services or treatment provided to the plaintiff and potentially other similarly situated patients or consumers.
- Filed
- July 15, 2026
- Represents
- Kristy Wilce
Alvarez v. Apple Inc.
A proposed class action has been filed against Apple Inc. in federal court in Northern California. Based on the docket information provided, the specific allegations are not yet detailed in the available materials, though the case is classified under "Other Statutory Actions" as the nature of suit.
- Filed
- July 15, 2026
- Represents
- Anthony Alvarez
Workwise Solutions Inc. Class Action
Katherine Gonzalez has filed a proposed class action against Workwise Solutions Inc. in federal court. The nature of suit code suggests a statutory claim, though specific details are not available from the docket entry. Without additional information about the allegations, the case appears to potentially involve employment-related or consumer protection matters.
- Filed
- June 3, 2026
- Represents
- Katherine Gonzalez
A.G. v. STIIIZY, Inc.
A proposed class action against STIIIZY, Inc., a cannabis products company, apparently concerning personal property or consumer product-related claims. The plaintiff initially sought to proceed under a pseudonym, but that motion was denied by the court. The defendant has filed a motion to dismiss or strike portions of the complaint.
- Filed
- May 12, 2026
- Represents
- A.G., B.R., R.M.
Shelton v. Reliant Engineering TCPA Class Action
This proposed class action alleges that Reliant Engineering & Manufacturing Services, Inc. violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), likely involving unwanted calls, texts, or automated communications directed at consumers. The complaint was newly filed in federal court and has not yet proceeded to discovery or settlement.
- Filed
- April 30, 2026
- Represents
- James E. Shelton
Nicki Apaydin v. Rover Group Class Action
A proposed class action against Rover Group, Inc., apparently filed by a consumer. The docket entries show early procedural motions, including the defendant's motion to compel arbitration, but the underlying claims are not detailed in the available caption and docket text. The nature of suit code (890 - Other Statutory Actions) and the consumer plaintiff name suggest consumer-related allegations, though the specific nature of the dispute is not evident from the materials provided.
- Filed
- April 21, 2026
- Represents
- Nicki Apaydin
Monkey Taps Consumer Class Action
This proposed class action was filed by Cameron Decker against Monkey Taps, LLC in federal court. The nature of suit is listed as "Other Statutory Actions," but specific details about the underlying claims are not available from the docket information provided. The case appears to involve potential consumer allegations, though the exact nature of the alleged harm cannot be determined from the caption alone.
- Filed
- April 16, 2026
- Represents
- Cameron Decker
Bostick v. Intuit Class Action
A proposed class action against Intuit, Inc. has been filed in federal court. The specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket information, but the nature of suit code suggests statutory claims of potential concern to consumers or account holders of Intuit's products or services.
- Filed
- March 6, 2026
- Represents
- Zachary Bostick
Leslie Cooper v. Hume Health Corp. Fraud Class Action
A proposed class action alleges that Hume Health Corp. engaged in fraud in connection with healthcare services or products. The case was filed in the Central District of California under a general fraud statute of nature, though the specific allegations and scope of the proposed class are not detailed in the available docket information.
- Filed
- February 16, 2026
- Represents
- Leslie Cooper, Katrina Peoples
Lenovo Consumer Class Action
A proposed class action has been filed against Lenovo (United States) Inc. in federal court. Based on the nature of suit designation and the consumer plaintiff name, this appears to concern alleged statutory violations related to Lenovo's products or services, though the specific claims cannot be determined from the available docket information.
- Filed
- February 5, 2026
- Represents
- Spencer Christy
Otter.AI Privacy Class Action
A proposed class action has been filed against Otter.AI concerning alleged privacy violations. The complaint appears to involve improper handling or disclosure of user data or privacy practices related to Otter.AI's services. The case is in its early stages, with details of the specific allegations not yet available in the docket entries provided.
- Filed
- August 15, 2025
- Represents
- Justin Brewer, Jasper Pierson Walker, Michael Walker, Chaka Theus, Nadine Winston, Riley Dolan, Emily Ryan
EyeBuyDirect Consumer Class Action
A proposed class action filed by plaintiff Erika Ramos against EyeBuyDirect, Inc., an online eyewear retailer. The docket text does not specify the exact allegations, but the case is brought under federal statutory law (Nature of Suit 890) and has proceeded through scheduling and a protective order. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts.
- Filed
- March 20, 2025
- Represents
- EyeBuyDirect, Inc.
“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.