CClaimWatch
In litigation — no settlement yetconsumer products

A.G. v. STIIIZY, Inc.

Verified September 19, 2026Found via the federal court docketHow ClaimWatch verifies cases

Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.

Where this case stands

In litigation

The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.

Pending in the District Court, C.D. California (No. 2:26-cv-05089).

  1. May 12, 2026
    Case filed

What happened

A proposed class action against STIIIZY, Inc., a cannabis products company, apparently concerning personal property or consumer product-related claims. The plaintiff initially sought to proceed under a pseudonym, but that motion was denied by the court. The defendant has filed a motion to dismiss or strike portions of the complaint.

Do you qualify?

No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.

How to file

There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.

Common questions

Can I file a claim in the A.G. v. STIIIZY, Inc. case?
No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed May 12, 2026 in the District Court, C.D. California (No. 2:26-cv-05089).What a class action lawsuit is →
Who are the attorneys in the A.G. v. STIIIZY, Inc.?
For the plaintiffs: Elena A. Belov (Almeida Law Group LLC); Edward W. Ciolko; Arturo Jose Pena Miranda; Victor J. Sandoval (Almeida Law Group LLC). For STIIIZY, Inc.: Monique Michele Candiff (Bird, Marella, Rhow, Lincenberg, Drooks and Nessim, LLP); Marc E Masters (Bird, Marella, Rhow, Lincenberg, Drooks and Nessim, LLP); Ekwan E. Rhow (Bird Marella Rhow Lincenberg Drooks and Nessim, LLP). From the public court docket.

Who's involved

Plaintiffs

  • R.M.
  • B.R.
  • A.G.

Defendants

  • STIIIZY, Inc.

Counsel for plaintiffs

Other cases these firms appear in

From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.

In the news

Headlines via NewsAPI.

Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member

Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.

More consumer products settlements

View all →
November 25, 2026No proof neededprivacy

Skin360 BIPA Settlement

Equal payment to all valid claimants from the $4.7 million Settlement Fund, minus Settlement Administrator costs, attorneys' fees (up to one-third of the fund), and service payments to Class Representatives (up to $5,000 each)

November 27, 2026No proof neededconsumer products

Dr. Squatch Products Class Action Settlement

Your payment will be calculated pro rata based on the number of valid claim forms submitted by the settlement class.

December 14, 2026consumer products

Thinkware Dashcam Settlement

Pro rata payment based on number of valid claims submitted

December 17, 2026consumer products

Service Spot Settlement - ParkOn.com and CheapAirportParking.org Reservation Fee

Pro rata portion of the Settlement Fund based on the total amount of processing fees paid