William Blair Castle
KJC Law Group, A.P.C.
- Address of record
- 9701 Wilshire Blvd., Ste 1000, Beverly Hills, CA 90212, 310-861-7797
- Phone
- (310) 861-7797
Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.
Case history
Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.
Gay v. Amdep Holdings Fraud Class Action
A proposed class action has been filed against Amdep Holdings, LLC alleging fraud. Based on the nature of suit code alone, the specific claims and alleged conduct cannot be determined from the available docket information. The case appears to concern fraud allegations that may affect ordinary consumers or account holders, though further details would be needed to confirm the scope and nature of the alleged misconduct.
- Filed
- June 10, 2026
- Represents
- John Gay
Hahn v. Open Door Community Health Centers
A proposed class action against Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation and TriZetto Provider Solutions LLC, apparently concerning alleged defects or failures in software or systems used by Open Door Community Health Centers. The case is classified as product liability tort, suggesting plaintiffs allege harm resulting from a defective product or service provided to the health center and its patients or users.
- Filed
- May 21, 2026
- Represents
- Open Door Community Health Centers
Lauren Morgan v. Best Buy Class Action
A proposed class action has been filed against Best Buy Co, Inc. in federal court. Based on the limited docket information available, the specific allegations cannot be determined, though the case appears to involve statutory claims against the retailer that could affect consumers or account holders. Additional details regarding the nature of the claims would require access to the full complaint.
- Filed
- April 6, 2026
- Represents
- Lauren Morgan
Open Door Community Health Centers Product Liability Class Action
This proposed class action alleges product liability claims against Open Door Community Health Centers. Based on the nature of suit coding, the complaint appears to concern an allegedly defective or harmful medical product or treatment. The case was recently filed in the Northern District of California.
- Filed
- March 16, 2026
- Represents
- Open Door Community Health Centers
FitJoy Consumer Fraud Class Action
A proposed class action against FitJoy, Inc. alleging fraud, apparently concerning consumer products or services. The specific nature of the alleged fraudulent conduct cannot be determined from the available docket information, though the case was filed as a fraud matter in federal court.
- Filed
- February 25, 2026
- Represents
- Benjamin Spreng
Oura Health Fraud Class Action
A proposed class action against Oura Health Oy, apparently concerning allegations of fraud related to the company's products or services. The case was filed in federal court in Northern California under a fraud-related nature of suit, suggesting claims that the defendant made false or deceptive statements to consumers.
- Filed
- December 26, 2025
- Represents
- Kunal Lekhadia, Neel Patel, Gaurav Agrawal
Monica Sanchez v. Gruns Nutrition Class Action
A proposed class action alleging fraud against Gruns Nutrition, Inc. The complaint apparently concerns misleading or deceptive practices related to the company's nutrition products or marketing claims. Ordinary consumers who purchased these products would likely be the class members, though specific allegations are not available from the docket metadata provided.
- Filed
- December 19, 2025
- Represents
- Monica Sanchez, Aneta Tackett
Fabletics Fraud Class Action
A proposed class action alleges that Fabletics, Inc. engaged in fraud. The complaint reportedly concerns consumer transactions or representations related to the defendant's business, though specific details regarding the nature of the alleged fraud are not available from the docket information provided.
- Filed
- December 4, 2025
- Represents
- Karl Mundt
Laird Superfood Fraud Class Action
Ana Fischer has filed a proposed class action against Laird Superfood, Inc. alleging fraud under nature of suit code 370. Based on the caption alone, the case apparently concerns consumer product claims, though the specific allegations regarding what statements or conduct constitute the alleged fraud are not detailed in the available docket information.
- Filed
- October 27, 2025
- Represents
- Anna Fischer
Omaha Steaks TCPA Class Action
A proposed class action against Omahasteaks.com, LLC, apparently concerning alleged violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The case appears to involve claims that the company made unsolicited telemarketing calls or sent unwanted text messages to consumers. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts, and no settlement has been reached.
- Filed
- May 16, 2025
- Represents
- Giossi Gina Dalmazzo Serras
Jomashop Consumer Fraud Class Action
A proposed class action against Jomashop, Inc., apparently concerning fraud, as indicated by the nature of suit (Other Fraud). The specific allegations are not detailed in the docket, but the case appears to involve claims that the company engaged in fraudulent conduct affecting consumers. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts and not yet a settlement.
- Filed
- March 21, 2025
- Represents
- Madison Levin
Portland Leather Goods Fraud Class Action
A proposed class action against Portland Leather Goods, Inc., apparently concerning allegations of fraud. The nature of suit is listed as 'Other Fraud,' suggesting claims of deceptive practices in connection with consumer products. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts and not yet a settlement.
- Filed
- March 3, 2025
- Represents
- Cooper Lyden
COMFRT LLC Consumer Fraud Class Action
A proposed class action against COMFRT LLC. The nature of suit is 'Other Fraud,' suggesting allegations of fraudulent conduct affecting consumers, but the caption and docket text provide no specific facts about the alleged fraud. The docket later shows a joint stipulation to dismiss the action with prejudice.
- Filed
- February 24, 2025
- Represents
- Anna Fischer
Arhaus Pricing and Sales Advertising Settlement
Arhaus engaged in pricing and sales advertising practices that misled customers. The company listed products with both a sale price and a higher reference price (sometimes with a strike-through), but customers who purchased these products did not receive appropriate refunds or credits. Arhaus has agreed to settle the lawsuit.
- Claim deadline
- December 19, 2025
- Represents
- Mariah Moses
“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.