Arhaus Pricing and Sales Advertising Settlement
Pro rata share of the Net Settlement Amount in the form of a store credit gift card or a cash payment, based on your total qualifying purchase amount during the Settlement Class Period divided by the total combined qualifying purchase amount of all Claimants.
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was December 19, 2025. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Arhaus engaged in pricing and sales advertising practices that misled customers. The company listed products with both a sale price and a higher reference price (sometimes with a strike-through), but customers who purchased these products did not receive appropriate refunds or credits. Arhaus has agreed to settle the lawsuit.
Do you qualify?
You are eligible if you purchased one or more Arhaus products on the Arhaus website from the State of California between April 2, 2020 through September 18, 2024, where the purchased product listed both a current sale price and a higher reference price, and you have not already received a refund or credit for your purchase.
How to file
Complete and submit a Claim Form online or by mail by December 19, 2025. You will receive a pro rata share of the settlement as either a store credit gift card or cash payment based on your qualifying purchase amount compared to all other claimants' qualifying purchases.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Tuft & Needle Deceptive Discount Advertising Settlement
Tuft & Needle allegedly deceptively advertised various discounts on mattress products sold on its website. The defendant denies liability and wrongdoing but has agreed to settle the claims.
Up to $75
Todd v. Ashley Furniture Industries - Mattress Fiberglass Settlement
Ashley Furniture Industries and related companies sold mattresses containing fiberglass as a fire-retardant material in the inner sock covering the foam. Plaintiffs allege the fiberglass can pass through the mattress cover or be released if the cover is removed, causing potential economic harm, property damage, or physical effects. The defendants deny all allegations and wrongdoing, and are settling for purposes of judicial efficiency.
Voucher good for use on single purchase at Ashley Furniture retailers; pro rata share based on total valid claims from $9 million Common Voucher Fund, plus potential pro rata cash payment if attorneys' fees and costs awarded are less than $3 million
Cosequin Dog Supplement Settlement
Nutramax Laboratories allegedly misrepresented the benefits and effectiveness of certain canine Cosequin® supplements in advertising and packaging. The company has reached an $11.5 million settlement without admitting wrongdoing.
$25–$150
Shimano Crankset Settlement
Shimano voluntarily recalled Hollowtech II cranksets manufactured before July 2019 due to a crash hazard. Plaintiffs alleged breaches of warranties and sought relief in connection with the advertising and marketing of the defendants' products and the alleged inadequacy of the voluntary recall. The defendants deny any wrongdoing and no physical injuries were alleged.
Reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket costs for purchasing a replacement crankset and installing it on your bicycle (if replacement occurred before September 21, 2023, and Express Warranty had expired)