CClaimWatch
Plaintiff counsel in 27 cases

Yana A. Hart

Clarkson Law Firm PC

Address of record
22525 Pacific Coast Highway, Malibu, CA 90265, 213-788-4050
Email
yhart@clarksonlawfirm.com
Phone
(213) 788-4050
Fax
Fax (213) 788-4070

Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.

27
Cases tracked
23 active · 4 settled
$118.5M
Plaintiff-side recovery
Disclosed settlement funds
—
Defense-side exposure
Resolved in settlements
2
Cases with values
of 27 tracked

Case history

Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.

Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Oura, Inc. Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against Oura, Inc. in federal court in Northern California. The specific allegations cannot be determined from the available docket information, but based on Oura's business (health and fitness tracking devices and related services), the case may concern product defects, data privacy, advertising claims, or related consumer issues.

Filed
August 20, 2026
Represents
Madison Surber
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Meta AI Glasses Class Action

A proposed class action against Meta concerning alleged fraud related to AI glasses products. The case was filed under a fraud nature of suit, suggesting claims that consumers or purchasers may have been deceived regarding the AI glasses or their capabilities.

Filed
March 4, 2026
Represents
Gina Bartone, Mateo Canu, Chandra Balderson, Jeffry Woodhead, Nikolause Tucker, Jason Hatch, Joseph Van Den Berghe, Neil Chen, Devon Dlugosz, Monique Sainz, Rickford Fraser, Rahleisha Davis, Daniel Doerr, Charles Graudins, Laddie Martinek, Clarinda Byrd, James Diedrich, Kristi Stewart, Victor Mitchell
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

7TABZ Retail Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action alleges fraud by 7TABZ Retail, LLC. Based on the nature of suit coding, the case apparently concerns deceptive or fraudulent conduct by the retailer, though specific details of the allegations are not available from the docket entry provided.

Filed
January 23, 2026
Represents
Z.B., T.M., R.A.
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Otter.ai Consumer Class Action

A proposed class action against Otter.ai, Inc. concerning unspecified consumer claims. Based on the nature of suit code (890 - Other Statutory Actions) and the company's business providing transcription and AI services, the case apparently involves consumer rights issues, though specific allegations cannot be determined from the caption and docket metadata provided.

Filed
September 3, 2025
Represents
Chaka Theus
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Otter.ai Class Action

This is a proposed class action against Otter.ai, Inc. filed in federal court. The specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket information, but the case involves claims that could potentially affect ordinary users of Otter.ai's services.

Filed
August 26, 2025
Represents
Jasper Pierson Walker, Michael Walker
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Otter.AI Privacy Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against Otter.AI concerning alleged privacy violations. The complaint appears to involve improper handling or disclosure of user data or privacy practices related to Otter.AI's services. The case is in its early stages, with details of the specific allegations not yet available in the docket entries provided.

Filed
August 15, 2025
Represents
Justin Brewer, Jasper Pierson Walker, Michael Walker, Chaka Theus, Nadine Winston, Riley Dolan, Emily Ryan
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Keffer Development Services Data Security Breach Class Action

This proposed class action alleges that Keffer Development Services, LLC suffered a data security breach affecting personal information of ordinary people. The case has been filed as a multidistrict litigation (MDL), indicating multiple related claims based on the security incident.

Filed
August 8, 2025
Represents
Jane Roe 25-10870
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Meta Platforms Consumer Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against Meta Platforms, Inc. in federal court. The docket text provided does not include detailed allegations, but the case is categorized under personal injury/other and appears to involve claims by ordinary individuals against Meta's consumer-facing platforms or services. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts and not yet a settlement.

Filed
June 13, 2025
Represents
Elizabeth Messenger, Ugochukwu Atulobi, Iveth Rodriguez, Lorine Derham, Tatiana Brodiski, Ara Sardarbegians, Mark Camplese
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Anker Product Liability Class Action

This is a putative class action against Anker Innovations Limited, apparently concerning product liability and contract claims. The docket reflects the parties are litigating motions to dismiss a second amended complaint, with defendant Fantasia Trading LLC also involved. The allegations have not been proven.

Filed
June 13, 2025
Represents
Megan Iudice, Stephen Lee, Sean Phillips, Hari Bathala, Derek Schuette
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Meta Android Privacy Class Action

A proposed class action against Meta Platforms, Inc., apparently concerning privacy issues related to its Android applications or services. The docket shows plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint, Meta moved to dismiss it, and one plaintiff voluntarily dismissed his individual claims. Specific factual allegations are not detailed in the available docket text beyond the case caption.

Filed
June 3, 2025
Represents
Elizabeth Messenger, Ugochukwu Atulobi, Iveth Rodriguez, Lorine Derham, Tatiana Brodiski, Ara Sardarbegians, Mark Camplese
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Matthew Weiss Personal Injury Class Action

A proposed class action was filed against Matthew Weiss and others, including California State University San Bernardino, its Board of Trustees, and Keffer Development Services LLC. The case is designated as Nature of Suit 360 (P.I.: Other), and the plaintiff is identified anonymously as Jane Doe 1. The available docket text does not specify the underlying allegations, but it shows the defendants sought an extension of time to respond to the complaint and that the case may be related to multidistrict litigation.

Filed
April 23, 2025
Represents
Jane Doe 1
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

GoodRx and Pharmacy Benefit Manager Antitrust Class Action

This appears to be a proposed class action against GoodRx and pharmacy benefit managers, apparently alleging antitrust violations. The case was recently filed, and the docket does not yet provide details of the alleged conduct, but it may concern pricing or competition issues affecting consumers of prescription drugs.

Filed
April 17, 2025
Represents
Grey Dog IV
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

University of Michigan Student Personal Injury Class Action

A proposed class action was filed in the Eastern District of Michigan by a student identified only as 'Student Doe' against the Board of Regents of the University of Michigan. The nature-of-suit code is for personal injury (other), but the docket text does not detail the specific claims. The case has been consolidated with lead case 25-10806, and plaintiffs have moved for appointment of interim class counsel.

Filed
April 8, 2025
Represents
Student Doe
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

PowerSchool Customer Data Breach Class Action

A proposed class action against PowerSchool Holdings, Inc. and PowerSchool Group, LLC, apparently concerning a customer data security breach. The case is pending as multidistrict litigation, and the allegations likely relate to the companies' handling of customer personal information.

Filed
April 8, 2025
Represents
Nicole Flick, M.C.
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

University of Michigan Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action against the Board of Regents of the University of Michigan, apparently concerning fraud. The docket indicates the case was filed in April 2025 and has been consolidated with lead case 25-10806, with motions for interim class counsel. Specific allegations are not detailed in the docket text, but the nature of suit is listed as Other Fraud.

Filed
April 2, 2025
Represents
Jane Doe
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Nissan Vehicle Defect Class Action

A proposed class action was filed against Nissan North America, Inc., apparently concerning alleged defects in motor vehicles. The case is brought under motor vehicle product liability, suggesting claims that certain Nissan vehicles may be defective. These are allegations in a newly filed case and have not been proven.

Filed
April 1, 2025
Represents
Deena Khalifa
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

University of Michigan Board of Regents Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against the University of Michigan Board of Regents. The case, brought by an anonymous plaintiff identified as Doe, appears to involve claims of fraud. The specific allegations are not described in the docket text.

Filed
March 28, 2025
Represents
Jane Doe
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

University of Michigan Data Breach Class Action

A proposed class action against Weiss and several University of Michigan officials, apparently related to a data security incident or privacy breach, as suggested by the involvement of the university's information security and IT leadership and the fraud nature of suit. The case is being coordinated with other similar 'Weiss/Keffer' cases in multidistrict litigation. These are allegations in a newly filed case and have not been proven.

Filed
March 21, 2025
Represents
Jane Doe, Jane Doe 25-10855, Jane Roe 25-10870, Jane Doe 25-10876, Jane Doe 25-10951, Jane Doe 25-10946, Jane Doe 25-10988, Jane Doe 25-10999
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

California Cryobank Consumer Class Action

This is a proposed class action against California Cryobank LLC, a sperm bank, apparently alleging that its services or products caused personal injury or other harm to consumers or patients. The available docket text does not provide specific factual allegations beyond the personal injury nature-of-suit designation, so the exact claims are unclear. The allegations have not been proven.

Filed
March 20, 2025
Represents
Jesse Jines, RHONDA ATTA, J. L., J. F.
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

STIIIZY Data Breach Settlement

STIIIZY, Inc. experienced a data breach in October 2024 where personal information and private health information was allegedly accessed, compromised, or stolen from the company's servers. The breach was announced on January 7, 2025. STIIIZY denies the allegations and all liability.

Claim deadline
September 10, 2026
Represents
G.E., Ryan Wenzel, Donald Hatch, Bradley Anderson, Elizabeth Orozco-Preza, Daniel Martinez, Lorenzo Montoya
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Samsung Electronics America Consumer Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action was filed against Samsung Electronics America, Inc., apparently alleging fraud. The nature-of-suit code is 370 (Other Fraud), but the docket text does not detail the specific claims. The court later dismissed the case without prejudice following a notice of settlement.

Filed
December 31, 2024
Represents
Anthony Ray Gonzalez
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Cannabis Oil Vaporizer Antitrust Class Action

A proposed class action against distributors of closed cannabis oil vaporizer systems and components. The case appears to allege antitrust violations that affected indirect purchasers of those products. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts and not yet a settlement.

Filed
December 16, 2024
Represents
S.K., D.G., D.C.
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

SAG-AFTRA Health Plan Data Breach Settlement

SAG-AFTRA Health Plan experienced a data breach between September 17-18, 2024, in which private information of health plan members may have been impacted. The defendant denies any wrongdoing but has agreed to settle the class action lawsuit.

Settlement fund
$950,000
Claim deadline
July 23, 2026
Represents
Matthew Rouillard, Kristy Munden, Steven Barr, Lee Wilkof, Massimiliano Furlan
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

GoodRx Antitrust Class Action

A proposed class action against GoodRx, Inc. apparently asserting antitrust claims. The docket text does not detail the specific allegations, but the case has been transferred to MDL 3148, indicating coordinated proceedings involving GoodRx. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts.

Filed
November 14, 2024
Represents
Grey Dog IV
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Ticketmaster Consumer Contract Class Action

A proposed class action against Ticketmaster, LLC, apparently concerning a contract dispute. The docket indicates a claim under 'Contract: Other,' but specific allegations are not available.

Filed
October 18, 2024
Represents
Steven Jeffrey Howitt
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

Comcast Data Breach Settlement

In October 2023, a third-party gained unauthorized access to Comcast customers' personal information in a cybersecurity incident. Comcast denies that it engaged in any wrongdoing or violated any law.

Settlement fund
$117.5M
Claim deadline
September 14, 2026
Represents
STEVEN PRESCOTT
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

Eisenhower Medical Center EMC Web Settlement

Eisenhower Medical Center allegedly disclosed personal and protected health information of patients to Facebook through the use of the Meta Pixel tracking code on its website. The information may have contained personal identifying information and health data. The defendant denies the allegations and claims.

Claim deadline
October 2, 2025
Represents
B. K., N. Z.

“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.