AT&T Customer Data Security Breach Class Action
Verified October 19, 2026Found via the federal court docketHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, N.D. California (No. 5:24-cv-02356).
- April 19, 2024Case filed
What happened
A proposed class action against AT&T, Inc., apparently concerning a customer data security breach. The case was transferred to the Northern District of Texas as part of multidistrict litigation titled In Re: AT&T Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation. The allegations are based only on the docket text and have not been proven.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the AT&T Customer Data Security Breach Class Action case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed April 19, 2024 in the District Court, N.D. California (No. 5:24-cv-02356).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the AT&T Customer Data Security Breach Class Action?
- For the plaintiffs: Joseph Winters Cotchett (Cotchett Pitre and McCarthy LLP); Andrew F. Kirtley (Cotchett Pitre and McCarthy LLP); Gia Jung (Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy); Thomas Eric Loeser (Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP). For AT&T, Inc.: Kyle Thomas Cutts (BakerHostetler LLP). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Faith Brown
- Charles Fairchild
- Daniel Mariscal
- David Vita
Defendants
- AT&T, Inc.
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Joseph Winters CotchettCotchett Pitre and McCarthy LLPRepresents David Vita, Daniel Mariscal, Charles Fairchild, Faith Brown9 tracked casesjcotchett@cpmlegal.com · (650) 697-6000
- Andrew F. KirtleyCotchett Pitre and McCarthy LLPRepresents David Vita, Daniel Mariscal, Charles Fairchild, Faith Brown3 tracked casesakirtley@cpmlegal.com · (650) 697-6000
- Gia JungCotchett Pitre & McCarthyRepresents David Vita, Daniel Mariscal, Charles Fairchild, Faith Brown5 tracked casesgjung@cpmlegal.com · (650) 259-3226
- Thomas Eric LoeserCotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLPRepresents David Vita, Daniel Mariscal, Charles Fairchild, Faith Brown25 tracked cases · $392.4M in disclosed settlementstloeser@cpmlegal.com · (206) 802-1272
Counsel for defendants
- Kyle Thomas CuttsBakerHostetler LLPRepresents AT&T, Inc.3 tracked caseskcutts@bakerlaw.com · (216) 586-7816
Other cases these firms appear in
- Educational Testing Service Testing Services Class Action · Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP
- HP Inc. Class Action · Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP
- Meta AI Glasses Class Action · Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP
- Marquis Software Solutions Data Breach Class Action · Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP
- Menzer v. Fanatics Holdings Class Action · BakerHostetler LLP
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.