CClaimWatch
In litigation — no settlement yetautomotiveconsumer products

Bridgestone Passenger Tire Antitrust Class Action

Last verified October 18, 2026Source: courtlistener-litigationHow ClaimWatch verifies cases

Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.

Where this case stands

In litigation

The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.

Pending in the District Court, N.D. Ohio (No. 5:24-rt-55007).

  1. April 30, 2024
    Case filed

What happened

This is a proposed class action against Bridgestone Corporation, apparently concerning alleged antitrust violations involving passenger vehicle replacement tires. The docket indicates the case is part of multidistrict litigation over replacement tires antitrust claims, and consumers who purchased such tires could plausibly be class members. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts and not a settlement.

Do you qualify?

No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.

How to file

There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.

Common questions

Can I file a claim in the Bridgestone Passenger Tire Antitrust Class Action case?
No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed April 30, 2024 in the District Court, N.D. Ohio (No. 5:24-rt-55007).What a class action lawsuit is →
Who are the attorneys in the Bridgestone Passenger Tire Antitrust Class Action?
For the plaintiffs: Joyce Chambers Reichard (Kelley Ferraro); John M. Murphy (Kelley & Ferraro); James L. Ferraro (Kelley & Ferraro); James G. Dallal (Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy - Burlingame). For Bridgestone Corporation: Christopher S. Yates (Latham & Watkins - San Francisco); Belinda S. Lee (Latham & Watkins - San Francisco); Ashley M. Bauer (Latham & Watkins - San Francisco); W. Bradford Longbrake (Hanna, Campbell & Powell). From the public court docket.

Who's involved

Plaintiffs

  • Rafael Lim
  • Jose Javier

Defendants

  • Pirelli Tire LLC
  • Pirelli & C.S.P.A.
  • Nokian Tyres U.S. Operations LLC
  • Nokian Tyres Inc.
  • Nokian Tyres PLC
  • Michelin North America, Inc.
  • Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements Michelin
  • Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

+ 4 more

Counsel for plaintiffs

Counsel for defendants

Other cases these firms appear in

From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.

Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member

Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.

More automotive settlements

View all →
December 14, 2026consumer products

Thinkware Dashcam Settlement

Pro rata payment based on number of valid claims submitted

Deadline TBDautomotive

Dodge Sliding Door Latch Settlement

Reimbursement for parts and labor costs you paid for repairs to the failing sliding door lock actuator