Health Center Partners of Southern California Healthcare Product Liability Class Action
Verified October 26, 2026Found via the federal court docketHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, S.D. California (No. 3:24-cv-00106).
- January 16, 2024Case filed
What happened
A proposed class action against Health Center Partners of Southern California, apparently involving personal injury claims related to health care or pharmaceutical products. The nature of suit indicates product liability allegations, but specific allegations are not provided in the docket metadata. This is a newly filed case and no facts have been proven.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Health Center Partners of Southern California Healthcare Product Liability Class Action case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed January 16, 2024 in the District Court, S.D. California (No. 3:24-cv-00106).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the Health Center Partners of Southern California Healthcare Product Liability Class Action?
- For the plaintiffs: Patrick N. Keegan (Keegan & Baker, LLP). For Health Center Partners of Southern California: Richard Henry Pfutzenreuter , IV (Larkin Hoffman Law Firm); Karl P. Schlecht (Tressler LLP); Michael J. Dailey (Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP); Craig J Mariam (Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- James Jackson
Defendants
- Doe Defendants 3-100
- Netgain Technology, LLC
- Council of Community Clinics
- Health Center Partners of Southern California
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Patrick N. KeeganKeegan & Baker, LLPRepresents James Jackson15 tracked cases · $475,000 in disclosed settlementspkeegan@keeganbaker.com · (760) 929-9303
Counsel for defendants
- Richard Henry Pfutzenreuter , IVLarkin Hoffman Law FirmRepresents Netgain Technology, LLChpfutzenreuter@larkinhoffman.com · (952) 896-3325
- Karl P. SchlechtTressler LLPRepresents Netgain Technology, LLCkschlecht@tresslerllp.com · (949) 336-1200
- Michael J. DaileyGordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLPRepresents Council of Community Clinics8 tracked casesmdailey@grsm.com · (213) 576-5000
- Craig J MariamGordon Rees Scully MansukhaniRepresents Council of Community Clinics3 tracked casescmariam@grsm.com · (213) 576-5000
Other cases these firms appear in
- Total Vision Data Breach Settlement · Keegan & Baker, LLP
- Doe v. Mercer Advisors Inc. Personal Injury Class Action · Keegan & Baker, LLP
- Berger v. Mercer Advisors Class Action · Keegan & Baker, LLP
- Blue Shield of California Privacy Class Action · Keegan & Baker, LLP
- Valley View School District Education Civil Rights Class Action · Tressler LLP
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.