AT&T Mobility Services Wage and Hour Settlement
What happened
AT&T Mobility Services LLC allegedly violated wage and hour laws by failing to pay back wages and unreimbursed business expenses to non-exempt employees in California. The company has agreed to settle the lawsuit without admitting wrongdoing by funding Individual Class Payments and Individual PAGA Payments to eligible employees.
Do you qualify?
Non-exempt employees who worked for AT&T Mobility Services LLC in California during the Class Period (September 21, 2022 to September 3, 2025) are eligible for Individual Class Payments. All non-exempt employees who worked during the PAGA Period (September 21, 2022 to September 3, 2025) are eligible for Individual PAGA Payments.
How to file
No claim form is required; you automatically participate in the settlement by doing nothing. If you want to opt out of the Class Settlement, submit a written Request for Exclusion to the Administrator by March 6, 2026. You can challenge the number of workweeks or pay periods worked using Defendant's records by submitting a written challenge by March 6, 2026.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →Novant Health Timeclock Rounding Collective Action Settlement
Novant Health allegedly used a timeclock rounding policy from September 2021 through February 2023 that caused hourly employees to lose overtime pay. Novant Health denies wrongdoing and asserts all employees were fully and properly paid. The parties settled the dispute to avoid trial costs and risks.
Your proportional share of the settlement calculated based on your length of employment in an hourly position during the class period (September 19, 2021 through February 11, 2023). Up to $403,730 total is available for employee payouts.
80/20 ERISA Settlement
The lawsuit challenges whether the 80/20, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan was properly administered and terminated by the defendants in accordance with ERISA (federal retirement law). The defendants are accused of violations in how they handled the Plan's administration and termination. Defendants deny all claims and admit no wrongdoing.
Petzing v. The Seven Motor Corporation Employment Application Settlement
Job applicants sued The Seven Motor Corporation for failing to disclose wage scales or salary ranges in job postings for open positions in Washington. The defendant disputes the claims and contends it has not violated any law.
Up to $2,172.30
EEOC v. Meathead Movers Age Discrimination Settlement
Meathead Movers allegedly engaged in age discrimination in hiring and recruitment in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) from at least 2017. The company has agreed to a settlement without admitting wrongdoing, providing up to $2 million to affected job applicants.
Up to $2 million total distributed to eligible applicants