Davis v. Aspire Lifestyles (Americas) Inc.
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was April 8, 2026. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Marquita Davis sued Aspire alleging that the company did not correctly pay hourly employees (Concierges and similar positions) for all hours worked, resulting in denied overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Aspire denies these allegations and maintains it has always complied with all relevant laws.
Do you qualify?
Anyone who worked for Aspire Lifestyles (Americas) Inc. as an hourly Lifestyle Consultant, Lifestyle Concierge, Customer Service Representative, or similar job title whose primary duty was handling inbound phone calls and completing research for members, between December 23, 2021, and October 16, 2025.
How to file
Complete and return the Opt-In Form attached to your Notice by April 8, 2026, or file online through the settlement website. Once your form is timely submitted, settlement funds will be mailed to you.
Common questions
- What is the claim deadline for the Davis v. Aspire Lifestyles (Americas) Inc.?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was April 8, 2026. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Is the Davis v. Aspire Lifestyles (Americas) Inc. notice real, or a scam?
- Claims are filed at davisaspirenotice.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Davis v. Aspire Lifestyles (Americas) Inc. be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. Payments cannot be issued until the court grants final approval and any appeals are resolved.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →Hill v. BrandSafway Services - Employment Application Settlement
BrandSafway Services and related companies allegedly failed to disclose wage and/or benefits information in their job postings for open positions in Washington. Defendants dispute these claims and contend they have not violated any law.
Up to $1,632.11
Perry v. Alatrade Foods - WARN Act Settlement
Alatrade Foods terminated employees at its Phenix City, Alabama facility due to a mass layoff or plant closing between February and August 2025. The plaintiff alleges the company violated the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act by failing to provide the required 60 days' advance notice. Alatrade denies all allegations and claims affirmative defenses.
Back pay at 100% of wages with standard payroll taxes withheld; amount depends on individual wages earned during the termination period
Hughes v. Smith County Jail Detention Settlement
Smith County detained people at the Smith County Jail for more than two days after they completed their custodial felony sentences. A federal court approved a settlement requiring the County to pay compensation to those affected.
From $685.87
Garner v. Amazon Retail LLC Settlement
Amazon Retail LLC allegedly violated Washington State wage and hour laws by failing to provide legally compliant meal and rest periods and pay all owed wages. The defendant has denied these allegations.