Davis v. Aspire Lifestyles (Americas) Inc.
Last verified July 13, 2026Source: claimdepotHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was April 8, 2026. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Marquita Davis sued Aspire alleging that the company did not correctly pay hourly employees (Concierges and similar positions) for all hours worked, resulting in denied overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Aspire denies these allegations and maintains it has always complied with all relevant laws.
Do you qualify?
Anyone who worked for Aspire Lifestyles (Americas) Inc. as an hourly Lifestyle Consultant, Lifestyle Concierge, Customer Service Representative, or similar job title whose primary duty was handling inbound phone calls and completing research for members, between December 23, 2021, and October 16, 2025.
Who is in the class
If you worked for Aspire Lifestyles (Americas) Inc. ("Aspire") as an hourly Lifestyle Consultant, Lifestyle Concierge, Customer Service Representative, or similar job title, whose primary job duty was to handle inbound phone calls and complete research for members requesting personal services, between December 23, 2021, and October 16, 2025, you may be entitled to a payment from a collective action lawsuit settlement.
Quoted from the settlement notice.
How to file
Complete and return the Opt-In Form attached to your Notice by April 8, 2026, or file online through the settlement website. Once your form is timely submitted, settlement funds will be mailed to you.
Common questions
- What is the claim deadline for the Davis v. Aspire Lifestyles (Americas) Inc.?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was April 8, 2026. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Is the Davis v. Aspire Lifestyles (Americas) Inc. notice real, or a scam?
- Claims are filed at davisaspirenotice.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Davis v. Aspire Lifestyles (Americas) Inc. be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. Payments cannot be issued until the court grants final approval and any appeals are resolved.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →TBJ Drywall & Taping Wage Settlement
The Illinois Attorney General sued TBJ Drywall & Taping, Inc. for allegedly failing to properly pay workers in accordance with Illinois law, including failure to pay overtime wages. Following an investigation, the parties settled, with TBJ agreeing to pay owed wages and other compensation to eligible workers.
…moreAmount varies by worker; see mailed/emailed notice for individual amount
PacBell Employment Practices Settlement
Pacific Bell Telephone Company allegedly violated California's Kin Care law (Labor Code sections 233 and 234) and Paid Sick-Days law (Labor Code section 246.5) by treating the use of accrued kin-care and paid sick-days as unprotected absences subject to discipline. The company allegedly engaged in unfair business practices and violated the Private Attorneys General Act. Pacific Bell denies all allegations.
…moreA sum of money based on the number of workweeks worked for Defendant from January 1, 2021 to October 23, 2025
AOCLSC INC. Wage and Hour Settlement
Former employees of AOCLSC INC. sued the company for alleged wage and hour violations. The company has agreed to settle by paying back wages to non-exempt hourly employees who worked during the class period and paying penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act.
…more