DoorDash Restitution Settlement for California Drivers
Last verified July 13, 2026Source: claimdepotHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was March 18, 2026. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
DoorDash was ordered to provide restitution to California drivers who either opted out of previous settlement classes or completed deliveries during specific time periods. The drivers allege DoorDash violated state labor laws.
Do you qualify?
Marko Eligible Drivers: Those who completed at least one delivery in California from August 30, 2016 through December 31, 2020, and opted out of the Marko settlement class. Marciano Eligible Drivers: Those who completed at least one delivery in California from June 17, 2016 through August 29, 2016, and opted out of the Marciano settlement class.
Who is in the class
All drivers who completed at least one delivery in California during the time period from August 30, 2016, through December 31, 2020, who opted out of the Settlement Class in Marko, et al. v. DoorDash Inc., Los Angeles Sup. Ct. Case No. BC659841 and have not individually settled their claims with DoorDash, or all drivers who completed at least one delivery in California during the time period from June 17, 2016, through August 29, 2016, who opted out of the Settlement Class in Marciano, et al. v. DoorDash, Inc., San Francisco Super. Ct. Case No. CGC-15-548101.
Quoted from the settlement notice.
How to file
Submit your claim online using your Unique ID and PIN from the Notice you received, or download and mail a printable claim form. The deadline is March 18, 2026.
Common questions
- What is the claim deadline for the DoorDash Restitution Settlement for California Drivers?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was March 18, 2026. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Is the DoorDash Restitution Settlement for California Drivers notice real, or a scam?
- Claims are filed at doordashrestitutioneligibledrivers.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the DoorDash Restitution Settlement for California Drivers be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. Payments cannot be issued until the court grants final approval and any appeals are resolved.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →TBJ Drywall & Taping Wage Settlement
The Illinois Attorney General sued TBJ Drywall & Taping, Inc. for allegedly failing to properly pay workers in accordance with Illinois law, including failure to pay overtime wages. Following an investigation, the parties settled, with TBJ agreeing to pay owed wages and other compensation to eligible workers.
…moreAmount varies by worker; see mailed/emailed notice for individual amount
PacBell Employment Practices Settlement
Pacific Bell Telephone Company allegedly violated California's Kin Care law (Labor Code sections 233 and 234) and Paid Sick-Days law (Labor Code section 246.5) by treating the use of accrued kin-care and paid sick-days as unprotected absences subject to discipline. The company allegedly engaged in unfair business practices and violated the Private Attorneys General Act. Pacific Bell denies all allegations.
…moreA sum of money based on the number of workweeks worked for Defendant from January 1, 2021 to October 23, 2025
AOCLSC INC. Wage and Hour Settlement
Former employees of AOCLSC INC. sued the company for alleged wage and hour violations. The company has agreed to settle by paying back wages to non-exempt hourly employees who worked during the class period and paying penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act.
…more