Hewlett Packard Enterprise Equal Pay Settlement
This settlement is closed to new claims. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company is accused of paying women less than men for substantially equal work in violation of California's Equal Pay Act and other employment laws. The defendant denies the claims and maintains it fully complied with all applicable laws.
Do you qualify?
Women who were actively employed in California by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company between November 1, 2015 and November 3, 2022 in specific job codes listed in the Settlement Agreement.
How to file
Class members who do nothing will automatically receive payment from the settlement fund. Those who wish to exclude themselves must opt out by the deadline, or they can object to the settlement in writing to Atticus Administration by the specified deadline.
Common questions
- Is the Hewlett Packard Enterprise Equal Pay Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Atticus Administration is the settlement administrator for this case. Claims are filed at equalpaysettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Hewlett Packard Enterprise Equal Pay Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for April 27, 2023; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →EEOC v. Meathead Movers Age Discrimination Settlement
The EEOC alleged that Meathead Movers, Inc. violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act by engaging in age discrimination in hiring and recruitment since at least 2017. The company was accused of discriminating against job applicants based on their age. Meathead Movers agreed to settle these claims through a court-approved Consent Decree on October 14, 2025.
Up to $2 million total to be distributed among eligible class members
Skin Spirit Essential Wage and Hour Settlement
SkinSpirit Essential allegedly violated California wage and hour laws by improperly compensating non-exempt employees. The company is settling claims for wage violations during the class period and penalty claims under California's Private Attorney General Act.
Petzing v. The Seven Motor Corporation Employment Application Settlement
The Seven Motor Corporation allegedly failed to disclose the wage scale or salary range in its job postings for open positions in Washington. The defendant disputes the claims and contends it has not violated any law.
Up to $2,172.30
Hill v. Delphinus Engineering Inc. Settlement
Delphinus Engineering Inc. allegedly failed to disclose wage scales, salary ranges, and general descriptions of benefits and other compensation in job postings for open positions in Washington. The defendant disputes the claims and denies any violation of law.
The settlement fund ranges from $1,802,386.04 to $2,745,000.00 depending on the number of claims submitted.