IHOP/Mesk Investment Wage Transparency Settlement
Up to $1,414.37
Last verified July 13, 2026Source: claimdepotHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was October 27, 2025. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Mesk Investment (IHOP) allegedly violated Washington's pay transparency law by posting job openings without disclosing the wage scale, salary range, or a general description of benefits and compensation. The defendants deny the claims and admit no wrongdoing. A settlement has been reached without a court determination on the merits.
Do you qualify?
Anyone who applied for a job opening with IHOP (Mesk Investment) in Washington State between January 1, 2023 and November 30, 2023, where the job posting did not disclose the wage scale, salary range, or general description of benefits and other compensation.
Who is in the class
Plaintiff and all individuals who, from January 1, 2023, through November 30, 2023, applied for a job opening in the State of Washington with Defendants where the job posting did not disclose the wage scale or salary range and/or a general description of benefits or other compensation for the position.
Quoted from the settlement notice.
How to file
Submit a Claim Form by October 27, 2025. Instructions for submitting your Claim Form are available on the settlement website (FAQ 7). No proof of application is required to submit a basic claim.
Common questions
- How much does the IHOP/Mesk Investment Wage Transparency Settlement pay?
- Estimated payout: Up to $1,414.37. The total settlement fund is $4.1M. Actual amounts depend on how many valid claims are filed — most settlements divide a fixed fund pro rata, so a higher claim rate means a smaller individual check. An "up to" figure is a cap, not a guarantee.
- What is the claim deadline for the IHOP/Mesk Investment Wage Transparency Settlement?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was October 27, 2025. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Do I need proof of purchase for the IHOP/Mesk Investment Wage Transparency Settlement?
- No. You can file without a receipt or proof of purchase. You attest that you qualify and submit basic details, though claims are still subject to review and submitting a false claim is a crime.
- Is the IHOP/Mesk Investment Wage Transparency Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Simpluris, Inc. is the settlement administrator for this case. Claims are filed at milisettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the IHOP/Mesk Investment Wage Transparency Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for December 5, 2025; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →TBJ Drywall & Taping Wage Settlement
The Illinois Attorney General sued TBJ Drywall & Taping, Inc. for allegedly failing to properly pay workers in accordance with Illinois law, including failure to pay overtime wages. Following an investigation, the parties settled, with TBJ agreeing to pay owed wages and other compensation to eligible workers.
…moreAmount varies by worker; see mailed/emailed notice for individual amount
PacBell Employment Practices Settlement
Pacific Bell Telephone Company allegedly violated California's Kin Care law (Labor Code sections 233 and 234) and Paid Sick-Days law (Labor Code section 246.5) by treating the use of accrued kin-care and paid sick-days as unprotected absences subject to discipline. The company allegedly engaged in unfair business practices and violated the Private Attorneys General Act. Pacific Bell denies all allegations.
…moreA sum of money based on the number of workweeks worked for Defendant from January 1, 2021 to October 23, 2025
AOCLSC INC. Wage and Hour Settlement
Former employees of AOCLSC INC. sued the company for alleged wage and hour violations. The company has agreed to settle by paying back wages to non-exempt hourly employees who worked during the class period and paying penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act.
…more