Johnson Air Force Settlement
This settlement is closed to new claims. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
The Air Force allegedly discharged thousands of service members with Other Than Honorable or General service characterizations since 2001 due to post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, military sexual trauma, or other behavioral health conditions. Additionally, the Air Force allegedly systematically denied discharge status upgrades to veterans with these conditions. The Air Force denies these allegations but has agreed to settle.
Do you qualify?
Air Force, Space Force, Air Force Reserve, or Air National Guard members with discharge dates from October 7, 2001 onward who received General or Other Than Honorable discharges, submitted at least one discharge upgrade application on or after September 13, 2006, have not received upgrades to Honorable, and have documented diagnoses or evidence of PTSD, traumatic brain injury, other mental health conditions, military sexual trauma, or sexual assault/harassment.
How to file
Eligible class members will receive separate notices regarding automatic reconsideration of certain decisions (2015-2023) or reapplication rights (2006-2015). The Air Force and class counsel will send notices with details on how to proceed, including referral information for free legal representation and medical services. Additional evidence can be submitted within 60 days of receiving notice.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →80/20 ERISA Settlement
The 80/20 Employee Stock Ownership Plan was allegedly administered and terminated by the Defendants in violation of ERISA (the federal law regulating private retirement plans). The lawsuit also involved claims that certain other defendants knowingly participated in these ERISA violations. Defendants deny all claims and admit no fault or liability.
Dallas BBQ ESOP Settlement
This settlement resolves a class action lawsuit concerning the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) sponsored by W BBQ Holdings, Inc., which operates Dallas BBQ restaurants. The defendants have agreed to settle without admitting wrongdoing.
EEOC v. Meathead Movers Age Discrimination Settlement
The EEOC alleged that Meathead Movers, Inc. violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act by engaging in age discrimination in hiring and recruitment since at least 2017. The company was accused of discriminating against job applicants based on their age. Meathead Movers agreed to settle these claims through a court-approved Consent Decree on October 14, 2025.
Up to $2 million total to be distributed among eligible class members
Petzing v. The Seven Motor Corporation Employment Application Settlement
The Seven Motor Corporation allegedly failed to disclose the wage scale or salary range in its job postings for open positions in Washington. The defendant disputes the claims and contends it has not violated any law.
Up to $2,172.30