Menard Bonded Abrasive Wheel Settlement
Last verified July 13, 2026Source: claimdepotHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was July 7, 2026. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Menard Inc., Disston Company, and Gino Development allegedly failed to provide adequate disclosures regarding the date contained on Menard-branded PERFORMAX or MASTERFORCE bonded abrasive wheels. The defendants deny no wrongdoing is not explicitly stated on the page.
Do you qualify?
Anyone who purchased one or more Menard-branded PERFORMAX or MASTERFORCE bonded abrasive wheels between June 10, 2018, and April 22, 2026.
What you can claim
Read from the official settlement notice. Confirm the terms that apply to you on the administrator's site before filing.
Replacement Wheels (Tier 1 - Without Proof of Purchase)
$3 eachParticipating Claimants who do not submit Proof of Purchase shall receive at least one new replacement wheel of similar specification to the Covered Products, with a value of approximately $3.00 per wheel, up to a maximum of five replacement wheels per claimant.
Cash Reimbursement (Tier 2 - With Proof of Purchase)
$50 eachParticipating Claimants who submit Proof of Purchase for one or more Covered Products shall receive a payment equal to the total amount of such purchases up to a maximum of $50 per claimant.
Website Modifications and Product Literature
Defendant Menard will review its website and make modifications to explain the expiration date placed on the Covered Products within six months of the Effective Date, and will provide product literature explaining proper use and expiration date information.
Who is in the class
You are included in this settlement as a Class Member if you purchased any of the Covered Products at retail in the United States and its territories from June 10, 2018, through April 22, 2026.
Quoted from the settlement notice.
How to file
Submit a Claim Form to receive money or replacement part(s) from the Settlement by the deadline of July 7, 2026. By submitting a claim, you give up your rights to sue and will be bound by any final judgment.
Common questions
- How much does the Menard Bonded Abrasive Wheel Settlement pay?
- The total settlement fund is $775,000. Actual amounts depend on how many valid claims are filed — most settlements divide a fixed fund pro rata, so a higher claim rate means a smaller individual check. An "up to" figure is a cap, not a guarantee.
- What is the claim deadline for the Menard Bonded Abrasive Wheel Settlement?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was July 7, 2026. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Do I need proof of purchase for the Menard Bonded Abrasive Wheel Settlement?
- No. You can file without a receipt or proof of purchase. You attest that you qualify and submit basic details, though claims are still subject to review and submitting a false claim is a crime.
- Is the Menard Bonded Abrasive Wheel Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Simpluris is the settlement administrator for this case. Claims are filed at menardbondedabrasivewheelsettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Menard Bonded Abrasive Wheel Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for August 17, 2026; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.
Who's involved
Counsel for defendants
Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Schnucks Markets Sales Tax Settlement
Schnucks Markets allegedly illegally charged sales tax on the full retail price of purchases before applying rewards points discounts, instead of calculating tax on the discounted price. The lawsuit claims Schnucks misled customers about the tax calculation and collected excess tax revenue.
…moreUp to $7
Skin360 BIPA Settlement
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. allegedly violated Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting, storing, disclosing, and profiting from biometric identifiers and information from people who scanned their faces during Skin360 skin assessments without providing required written disclosures and obtaining written consent. The defendant denies wrongdoing and admits no violation.
…moreEqual payment to all valid claimants from the $4.7 million Settlement Fund, minus Settlement Administrator costs, attorneys' fees (up to one-third of the fund), and service payments to Class Representatives (up to $5,000 each)
Dr. Squatch Products Class Action Settlement
Plaintiffs alleged that Dr. Squatch represented certain shampoo, conditioner, deodorant, soap and other personal care products as natural when they contained synthetic ingredients. Dr. Squatch denies wrongdoing and maintains the products were properly labeled. The parties settled to avoid the costs and uncertainty of litigation.
…moreYour payment will be calculated pro rata based on the number of valid claim forms submitted by the settlement class.
Thinkware Dashcam Settlement
Thinkware Systems USA, Inc. is accused of misrepresenting and falsely advertising that its dashcam models featured a "Super Night Vision" function, while failing to disclose that this function was only available in parking mode. The defendant denies these allegations and wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid further litigation.
…morePro rata payment based on number of valid claims submitted