Miclat v. Advanced Care Staffing Settlement
$1,200–$1,320
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was February 17, 2026. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Advanced Care Staffing and Priority Care Staffing allegedly violated labor laws by requiring healthcare workers to pay money if they left before their contracts ended, and by imposing contract terms that forced workers to stay longer and accept lower pay than they would have otherwise chosen.
Do you qualify?
Healthcare workers who entered the United States through Advanced Care Staffing or Priority Care Staffing's foreign nurse recruitment program and worked for either company between September 16, 2012 and June 11, 2025.
How to file
If you received a postcard or email notice, you are automatically in the settlement and can do nothing to receive an average payment of $1,200. To receive approximately 10% more, submit an opt-in form (FLSA Consent and Release Form) by February 17, 2026 by mail or electronically.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →80/20 ERISA Settlement
The 80/20 Employee Stock Ownership Plan was allegedly administered and terminated by the Defendants in violation of ERISA (the federal law regulating private retirement plans). The lawsuit also involved claims that certain other defendants knowingly participated in these ERISA violations. Defendants deny all claims and admit no fault or liability.
Dallas BBQ ESOP Settlement
This settlement resolves a class action lawsuit concerning the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) sponsored by W BBQ Holdings, Inc., which operates Dallas BBQ restaurants. The defendants have agreed to settle without admitting wrongdoing.
EEOC v. Meathead Movers Age Discrimination Settlement
The EEOC alleged that Meathead Movers, Inc. violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act by engaging in age discrimination in hiring and recruitment since at least 2017. The company was accused of discriminating against job applicants based on their age. Meathead Movers agreed to settle these claims through a court-approved Consent Decree on October 14, 2025.
Up to $2 million total to be distributed among eligible class members
Petzing v. The Seven Motor Corporation Employment Application Settlement
The Seven Motor Corporation allegedly failed to disclose the wage scale or salary range in its job postings for open positions in Washington. The defendant disputes the claims and contends it has not violated any law.
Up to $2,172.30