CClaimWatch
Claims closedemployment

Milito v. Splunk LLC Employment Application Settlement

Up to $1,673.71

This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was May 25, 2026. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →

What happened

John Milito filed a lawsuit against Splunk LLC and Cisco Systems, Inc. on behalf of himself and a class of similarly situated employment applicants. The lawsuit alleges claims related to the application for employment process with these companies.

Do you qualify?

Anyone who applied for employment with Splunk LLC or Cisco Systems, Inc. during the class period specified in the lawsuit.

How to file

Submit a Claim Form online using your Unique ID and PIN found in the Notice sent to you, or mail or email the form to the Settlement Administrator. The deadline to submit is May 25, 2026.

Common questions

How much does the Milito v. Splunk LLC Employment Application Settlement pay?
Estimated payout: Up to $1,673.71. Actual amounts depend on how many valid claims are filed — most settlements divide a fixed fund pro rata, so a higher claim rate means a smaller individual check. An "up to" figure is a cap, not a guarantee.
What is the claim deadline for the Milito v. Splunk LLC Employment Application Settlement?
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was May 25, 2026. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
Is the Milito v. Splunk LLC Employment Application Settlement notice real, or a scam?
Claims are filed at epoasettlementsllc.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
When will payments from the Milito v. Splunk LLC Employment Application Settlement be sent?
Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for July 17, 2026; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.

This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.

More employment settlements

View all →
September 7, 2026employment

Hill v. BrandSafway Services - Employment Application Settlement

BrandSafway Services and related companies allegedly failed to disclose wage and/or benefits information in their job postings for open positions in Washington. Defendants dispute these claims and contend they have not violated any law.

Up to $1,632.11

September 16, 2026employment

Perry v. Alatrade Foods - WARN Act Settlement

Alatrade Foods terminated employees at its Phenix City, Alabama facility due to a mass layoff or plant closing between February and August 2025. The plaintiff alleges the company violated the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act by failing to provide the required 60 days' advance notice. Alatrade denies all allegations and claims affirmative defenses.

Back pay at 100% of wages with standard payroll taxes withheld; amount depends on individual wages earned during the termination period

November 2, 2026No proof neededemployment

Hughes v. Smith County Jail Detention Settlement

Smith County detained people at the Smith County Jail for more than two days after they completed their custodial felony sentences. A federal court approved a settlement requiring the County to pay compensation to those affected.

From $685.87

Deadline TBDemployment

Garner v. Amazon Retail LLC Settlement

Amazon Retail LLC allegedly violated Washington State wage and hour laws by failing to provide legally compliant meal and rest periods and pay all owed wages. The defendant has denied these allegations.