Powell v. AdaptHealth Corp. Contract Class Action
This case was recently filed and is being litigated — the claims below are allegations, not proven facts, and there is no settlement, claim form, or payout yet. Watch the case (right) and we'll email you when it moves, including if it settles and a claim process opens.
What happened
A proposed class action against AdaptHealth Corp. concerning an alleged breach of contract. The complaint was filed by Wilma Powell in federal court in Pennsylvania, apparently involving a contractual dispute that may affect multiple consumers or customers of the defendant.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Powell v. AdaptHealth Corp. Contract Class Action case?
- No. This case has been filed and is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. Many class actions are dismissed or never certified, so a case being filed does not mean anyone will be paid. If it settles and a claim process opens, that will be announced by a court-appointed settlement administrator.
- Where is the Powell v. AdaptHealth Corp. Contract Class Action case being heard?
- The case is before the District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania, case number 2:26-cv-05004. Everything alleged in the complaint is an allegation, not a proven fact.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Shimano Crankset Settlement
Shimano voluntarily recalled Hollowtech II cranksets manufactured before July 2019 due to a crash hazard. Plaintiffs alleged breaches of warranties and sought relief in connection with the advertising and marketing of the defendants' products and the alleged inadequacy of the voluntary recall. The defendants deny any wrongdoing and no physical injuries were alleged.
Reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket costs for purchasing a replacement crankset and installing it on your bicycle (if replacement occurred before September 21, 2023, and Express Warranty had expired)
Grubhub Delivery Fee Settlement
Grubhub made false or misleading representations regarding delivery fees, service fees, and menu prices on its delivery orders. Grubhub denies these allegations and denies any wrongdoing.
Up to $10
Nutricost Magnesium Glycinate Supplement Settlement
Nutricost sold Magnesium Glycinate Supplements marketed as containing 420 mg of magnesium "as magnesium glycinate" when they allegedly did not contain the labeled amount. Nutricost denies any wrongdoing and denies violating any state or federal law.
Individual payment amounts will depend on the total number of valid and timely claims filed by all Settlement Class Members.
Carter v. Green Skyline Apartments Habitability Settlement
The plaintiffs alleged that Green Skyline Apartments failed to maintain habitable conditions in the lobby, elevators, hallways, stairwells, and common areas of their building at 753 James Street in Syracuse. The defendant has neither admitted nor denied wrongdoing but agreed to settle the lawsuit to avoid the cost and inconvenience of litigation.
Individual allocated amount determined by number of months lived in building, with a cap in the Settlement Agreement. Each qualifying month equals one point; total points determine each member's share of the Net Settlement Fund.