Shimano Crankset Settlement
Reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket costs for purchasing a replacement crankset and installing it on your bicycle (if replacement occurred before September 21, 2023, and Express Warranty had expired)
Last verified July 13, 2026Source: claimdepotHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was August 4, 2026. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Shimano voluntarily recalled Hollowtech II cranksets manufactured before July 2019 due to a crash hazard. Plaintiffs alleged breaches of warranties and sought relief in connection with the advertising and marketing of the defendants' products and the alleged inadequacy of the voluntary recall. The defendants deny any wrongdoing and no physical injuries were alleged.
Do you qualify?
Anyone who purchased, received, were given, and/or owned a Designated Crankset (specific Ultegra and Dura-Ace models with production codes KF through RF) in the United States, including those who purchased a bicycle equipped with these cranksets.
How to file
Submit a Claim Form with supporting documentation to the Settlement Administrator showing you replaced your crankset due to separation, delamination, or evidence of delamination before September 21, 2023, and that the Express Warranty had expired. The claim must be submitted or postmarked by August 4, 2026. You do not need to submit a claim to receive the extended warranty—it applies automatically.
Common questions
- How much does the Shimano Crankset Settlement pay?
- Estimated payout: Reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket costs for purchasing a replacement crankset and installing it on your bicycle (if replacement occurred before September 21, 2023, and Express Warranty had expired). Actual amounts depend on how many valid claims are filed — most settlements divide a fixed fund pro rata, so a higher claim rate means a smaller individual check. An "up to" figure is a cap, not a guarantee.
- What is the claim deadline for the Shimano Crankset Settlement?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was August 4, 2026. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Do I need proof of purchase for the Shimano Crankset Settlement?
- Yes. This settlement asks for documentation supporting your claim — a receipt, an account record, or the notice you were sent. Check the official settlement website for exactly which documents are accepted.
- Is the Shimano Crankset Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Epiq is the settlement administrator for this case. Claims are filed at shimanocranksetsettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Shimano Crankset Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for February 2, 2026; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Brian Sielski(Consol Plaintiff)
- Dimitri Semizarov(Consol Plaintiff)
- Moussa Kouyate(Consol Plaintiff)
- Christopher Jennings(Consol Plaintiff)
- Dave Gonyer(Consol Plaintiff)
- Jose Delgado(Consol Plaintiff)
- John Bongiovanni(Consol Plaintiff)
- Steven Adelman(Consol Plaintiff)
+ 5 more
Defendants
- Giant Bicycle, Inc.(Consol Defendant)
- Trek Bicycle Corporation(Consol Defendant)
- Specialized Bicycle Components Inc.
- Shimano North America Holding Inc.
- Shimano North America Bicycle Inc.
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Daniel SeltzLieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein LLP
- Andrew Joseph BedigianLarson LLP
- Steven M JodlowskiDiCello Levitt LLP
- Stephen Gerard LarsonLarson LLP
- Robert G. LoewyLaw Offices of Robert Loewy PC
- Nicholas F. WasdinDwoskin Wasdin LLP
- John E. TangrenDiCello Levitt LLP
- Eric S. DwoskinDwoskin Wasdin LLP
- Daniel R. FerriDiCello Levitt LLC
- Jason L LichtmanLieff Cabraser Heimann and Bernstein LLP
- Hannah R. LazarzLief Cabraser Heimann and Bernstein LLP
- Andrew R. KaufmanLieff Cabraser Heimann and Bernstein LLP
- Adam J. LevittDiCello Levitt LLC
- Sterling Lynn CluffBaron Budd PC
Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.
In the news
Headlines via NewsAPI. ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with these publications.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Schnucks Markets Sales Tax Settlement
Schnucks Markets allegedly illegally charged sales tax on the full retail price of purchases before applying rewards points discounts, instead of calculating tax on the discounted price. The lawsuit claims Schnucks misled customers about the tax calculation and collected excess tax revenue.
…moreUp to $7
Skin360 BIPA Settlement
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. allegedly violated Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting, storing, disclosing, and profiting from biometric identifiers and information from people who scanned their faces during Skin360 skin assessments without providing required written disclosures and obtaining written consent. The defendant denies wrongdoing and admits no violation.
…moreEqual payment to all valid claimants from the $4.7 million Settlement Fund, minus Settlement Administrator costs, attorneys' fees (up to one-third of the fund), and service payments to Class Representatives (up to $5,000 each)
Dr. Squatch Products Class Action Settlement
Plaintiffs alleged that Dr. Squatch represented certain shampoo, conditioner, deodorant, soap and other personal care products as natural when they contained synthetic ingredients. Dr. Squatch denies wrongdoing and maintains the products were properly labeled. The parties settled to avoid the costs and uncertainty of litigation.
…moreYour payment will be calculated pro rata based on the number of valid claim forms submitted by the settlement class.
Thinkware Dashcam Settlement
Thinkware Systems USA, Inc. is accused of misrepresenting and falsely advertising that its dashcam models featured a "Super Night Vision" function, while failing to disclose that this function was only available in parking mode. The defendant denies these allegations and wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid further litigation.
…morePro rata payment based on number of valid claims submitted