Shimano Crankset Settlement
Reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket costs for purchasing a replacement crankset and installing it on your bicycle (if replacement occurred before September 21, 2023, and Express Warranty had expired)
What happened
Shimano voluntarily recalled Hollowtech II cranksets manufactured before July 2019 due to a crash hazard. Plaintiffs alleged breaches of warranties and sought relief in connection with the advertising and marketing of the defendants' products and the alleged inadequacy of the voluntary recall. The defendants deny any wrongdoing and no physical injuries were alleged.
Do you qualify?
Anyone who purchased, received, were given, and/or owned a Designated Crankset (specific Ultegra and Dura-Ace models with production codes KF through RF) in the United States, including those who purchased a bicycle equipped with these cranksets.
How to file
Submit a Claim Form with supporting documentation to the Settlement Administrator showing you replaced your crankset due to separation, delamination, or evidence of delamination before September 21, 2023, and that the Express Warranty had expired. The claim must be submitted or postmarked by August 4, 2026. You do not need to submit a claim to receive the extended warranty—it applies automatically.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Brian Sielski(Consol Plaintiff)
- Dimitri Semizarov(Consol Plaintiff)
- Moussa Kouyate(Consol Plaintiff)
- Christopher Jennings(Consol Plaintiff)
- Dave Gonyer(Consol Plaintiff)
- Jose Delgado(Consol Plaintiff)
- John Bongiovanni(Consol Plaintiff)
- Steven Adelman(Consol Plaintiff)
+ 5 more
Defendants
- Giant Bicycle, Inc.(Consol Defendant)
- Trek Bicycle Corporation(Consol Defendant)
- Specialized Bicycle Components Inc.
- Shimano North America Holding Inc.
- Shimano North America Bicycle Inc.
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Daniel SeltzLieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein LLP
- Andrew Joseph BedigianLarson LLP
- Steven M JodlowskiDiCello Levitt LLP
- Stephen Gerard LarsonLarson LLP
- Robert G. LoewyLaw Offices of Robert Loewy PC
- Nicholas F. WasdinDwoskin Wasdin LLP
- John E. TangrenDiCello Levitt LLP
- Eric S. DwoskinDwoskin Wasdin LLP
- Daniel R. FerriDiCello Levitt LLC
- Jason L LichtmanLieff Cabraser Heimann and Bernstein LLP
- Hannah R. LazarzLief Cabraser Heimann and Bernstein LLP
- Andrew R. KaufmanLieff Cabraser Heimann and Bernstein LLP
- Adam J. LevittDiCello Levitt LLC
- Sterling Lynn CluffBaron Budd PC
Counsel for defendants
- Richard Thaddaeus JohnsonMunger Tolles and Olson LLP
- Benjamin G. BarokhMunger Tolles and Olson LLP
- L. Ashley AullMunger Tolles and Olson
- Justin P RaphaelMunger Tolles and Olson LLP
- Jason Dylan WeissMunger Tolles and Olson LLP
- Gregory P StoneMunger Tolles and Olson LLP
Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.
In the news
Headlines via NewsAPI. ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with these publications.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Tuft & Needle Deceptive Discount Advertising Settlement
Tuft & Needle allegedly deceptively advertised various discounts on mattress products sold on its website. The defendant denies liability and wrongdoing but has agreed to settle the claims.
Up to $75
Todd v. Ashley Furniture Industries - Mattress Fiberglass Settlement
Ashley Furniture Industries and related companies sold mattresses containing fiberglass as a fire-retardant material in the inner sock covering the foam. Plaintiffs allege the fiberglass can pass through the mattress cover or be released if the cover is removed, causing potential economic harm, property damage, or physical effects. The defendants deny all allegations and wrongdoing, and are settling for purposes of judicial efficiency.
Voucher good for use on single purchase at Ashley Furniture retailers; pro rata share based on total valid claims from $9 million Common Voucher Fund, plus potential pro rata cash payment if attorneys' fees and costs awarded are less than $3 million
Cosequin Dog Supplement Settlement
Nutramax Laboratories allegedly misrepresented the benefits and effectiveness of certain canine Cosequin® supplements in advertising and packaging. The company has reached an $11.5 million settlement without admitting wrongdoing.
$25–$150
Nutricost Magnesium Glycinate Supplement Settlement
Nutricost sold Magnesium Glycinate Supplements marketed as containing 420 mg of magnesium "as magnesium glycinate" when they allegedly did not contain the stated amount. Nutricost denies any wrongdoing and denies violating any state or federal law.
Individual payment amounts will depend on the total number of valid and timely claims filed by all Settlement Class Members.