Santiago v. Dynatrace - Sales Development Representative Overtime Settlement
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was June 26, 2026. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Dynatrace, Inc. is settling a collective action lawsuit filed on behalf of Sales Development Representatives under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The lawsuit alleges that Dynatrace failed to properly pay all SDRs for overtime hours worked. Dynatrace denies the allegations and no ruling has been made on the merits.
Do you qualify?
Current or former Sales Development Representatives employed by Dynatrace in the United States in eligible SDR job titles (including Sales Development Coordinator I/II, Specialist, Analyst II/III, Representative 1-4, and Senior Sales Development Coordinator) at any time between October 29, 2022 and November 19, 2025.
How to file
Complete and submit the Consent to Join Settlement, Release, and Claim Form by June 26, 2026. The form can be obtained from the Settlement Claims Administrator. By submitting the form, you receive a settlement payment but must release wage and hour claims covered by the settlement.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →80/20 ERISA Settlement
The 80/20 Employee Stock Ownership Plan was allegedly administered and terminated by the Defendants in violation of ERISA (the federal law regulating private retirement plans). The lawsuit also involved claims that certain other defendants knowingly participated in these ERISA violations. Defendants deny all claims and admit no fault or liability.
Dallas BBQ ESOP Settlement
This settlement resolves a class action lawsuit concerning the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) sponsored by W BBQ Holdings, Inc., which operates Dallas BBQ restaurants. The defendants have agreed to settle without admitting wrongdoing.
EEOC v. Meathead Movers Age Discrimination Settlement
The EEOC alleged that Meathead Movers, Inc. violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act by engaging in age discrimination in hiring and recruitment since at least 2017. The company was accused of discriminating against job applicants based on their age. Meathead Movers agreed to settle these claims through a court-approved Consent Decree on October 14, 2025.
Up to $2 million total to be distributed among eligible class members
Petzing v. The Seven Motor Corporation Employment Application Settlement
The Seven Motor Corporation allegedly failed to disclose the wage scale or salary range in its job postings for open positions in Washington. The defendant disputes the claims and contends it has not violated any law.
Up to $2,172.30