Santiago v. Dynatrace - Sales Development Representative Overtime Settlement
Last verified July 13, 2026Source: claimdepotHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was June 26, 2026. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Dynatrace, Inc. is settling a collective action lawsuit filed on behalf of Sales Development Representatives under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The lawsuit alleges that Dynatrace failed to properly pay all SDRs for overtime hours worked. Dynatrace denies the allegations and no ruling has been made on the merits.
Do you qualify?
Current or former Sales Development Representatives employed by Dynatrace in the United States in eligible SDR job titles (including Sales Development Coordinator I/II, Specialist, Analyst II/III, Representative 1-4, and Senior Sales Development Coordinator) at any time between October 29, 2022 and November 19, 2025.
What you can claim
Read from the official settlement notice. Confirm the terms that apply to you on the administrator's site before filing.
Settlement payment
By timely fully completing and submitting the Consent to Join Settlement, Release, and Claim Form, class members will receive their estimated settlement payment for wage and hour claims.
Who is in the class
current or former SDRs who worked for Dynatrace with any of the following job titles in the United States at any time during the period of October 29, 2022, through November 19, 2025: Sales Development Coordinator I, Sales Development Coordinator II, Sales Development Specialist, Sales Development Analyst II, Sales Development Analyst III, Sales Development Representative 1, Sales Development Representative 2, Sales Development Representative 3, Sales Development Representative 4, and Senior Sales Development Coordinator
Quoted from the settlement notice.
How to file
Complete and submit the Consent to Join Settlement, Release, and Claim Form by June 26, 2026. The form can be obtained from the Settlement Claims Administrator. By submitting the form, you receive a settlement payment but must release wage and hour claims covered by the settlement.
Common questions
- What is the claim deadline for the Santiago v. Dynatrace - Sales Development Representative Overtime Settlement?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was June 26, 2026. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Is the Santiago v. Dynatrace - Sales Development Representative Overtime Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Settlement Claims Administrator is the settlement administrator for this case. Claims are filed at dynatracelitigation.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Santiago v. Dynatrace - Sales Development Representative Overtime Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. Payments cannot be issued until the court grants final approval and any appeals are resolved.
In the news
Headlines via NewsAPI. ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with these publications.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →TBJ Drywall & Taping Wage Settlement
The Illinois Attorney General sued TBJ Drywall & Taping, Inc. for allegedly failing to properly pay workers in accordance with Illinois law, including failure to pay overtime wages. Following an investigation, the parties settled, with TBJ agreeing to pay owed wages and other compensation to eligible workers.
…moreAmount varies by worker; see mailed/emailed notice for individual amount
PacBell Employment Practices Settlement
Pacific Bell Telephone Company allegedly violated California's Kin Care law (Labor Code sections 233 and 234) and Paid Sick-Days law (Labor Code section 246.5) by treating the use of accrued kin-care and paid sick-days as unprotected absences subject to discipline. The company allegedly engaged in unfair business practices and violated the Private Attorneys General Act. Pacific Bell denies all allegations.
…moreA sum of money based on the number of workweeks worked for Defendant from January 1, 2021 to October 23, 2025
AOCLSC INC. Wage and Hour Settlement
Former employees of AOCLSC INC. sued the company for alleged wage and hour violations. The company has agreed to settle by paying back wages to non-exempt hourly employees who worked during the class period and paying penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act.
…more