Santiago v. Dynatrace - Sales Development Representative Overtime Settlement
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was June 26, 2026. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Dynatrace, Inc. is settling a collective action lawsuit filed on behalf of Sales Development Representatives under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The lawsuit alleges that Dynatrace failed to properly pay all SDRs for overtime hours worked. Dynatrace denies the allegations and no ruling has been made on the merits.
Do you qualify?
Current or former Sales Development Representatives employed by Dynatrace in the United States in eligible SDR job titles (including Sales Development Coordinator I/II, Specialist, Analyst II/III, Representative 1-4, and Senior Sales Development Coordinator) at any time between October 29, 2022 and November 19, 2025.
How to file
Complete and submit the Consent to Join Settlement, Release, and Claim Form by June 26, 2026. The form can be obtained from the Settlement Claims Administrator. By submitting the form, you receive a settlement payment but must release wage and hour claims covered by the settlement.
Common questions
- What is the claim deadline for the Santiago v. Dynatrace - Sales Development Representative Overtime Settlement?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was June 26, 2026. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Is the Santiago v. Dynatrace - Sales Development Representative Overtime Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Settlement Claims Administrator is the settlement administrator for this case. Claims are filed at dynatracelitigation.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Santiago v. Dynatrace - Sales Development Representative Overtime Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. Payments cannot be issued until the court grants final approval and any appeals are resolved.
In the news
Headlines via NewsAPI. ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with these publications.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →Hill v. BrandSafway Services - Employment Application Settlement
BrandSafway Services and related companies allegedly failed to disclose wage and/or benefits information in their job postings for open positions in Washington. Defendants dispute these claims and contend they have not violated any law.
Up to $1,632.11
Perry v. Alatrade Foods - WARN Act Settlement
Alatrade Foods terminated employees at its Phenix City, Alabama facility due to a mass layoff or plant closing between February and August 2025. The plaintiff alleges the company violated the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act by failing to provide the required 60 days' advance notice. Alatrade denies all allegations and claims affirmative defenses.
Back pay at 100% of wages with standard payroll taxes withheld; amount depends on individual wages earned during the termination period
Hughes v. Smith County Jail Detention Settlement
Smith County detained people at the Smith County Jail for more than two days after they completed their custodial felony sentences. A federal court approved a settlement requiring the County to pay compensation to those affected.
From $685.87
Garner v. Amazon Retail LLC Settlement
Amazon Retail LLC allegedly violated Washington State wage and hour laws by failing to provide legally compliant meal and rest periods and pay all owed wages. The defendant has denied these allegations.