Wells Fargo ESOP Settlement
Share of Net Settlement Fund based on Plan of Allocation after Court-approved deductions, settlement administration expenses, and attorneys' fees
Last verified July 13, 2026Source: claimdepotHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Wells Fargo allegedly unlawfully used dividends from Wells Fargo Preferred Stock held in the ESOP to offset employer contributions to the plan, and GreatBanc, as independent fiduciary, allegedly knowingly participated in these violations and failed to remedy them. The lawsuit alleges breaches of fiduciary duties and prohibited transactions under ERISA. Defendants deny all allegations of wrongdoing.
Do you qualify?
All participants in the Wells Fargo & Co. 401(k) Plan from September 27, 2016, to December 30, 2022, who held any portion of their Plan accounts in the Wells Fargo ESOP Fund during that period. Excluded are individual Defendants, their beneficiaries and families, and Wells Fargo officers and directors.
Who is in the class
All participants in the Wells Fargo & Co. 401(k) Plan from September 27, 2016 to December 30, 2022 (the "Class Period"), who held any portion of their Plan accounts, at any time during the Class Period, in the Wells Fargo ESOP Fund. Excluded from the class are individual Defendants, individual Defendants' beneficiaries, individual Defendants' immediate families, and officers and directors of Wells Fargo.
Quoted from the settlement notice.
How to file
If your plan account is active (positive balance), you will automatically receive your share as a direct deposit to your plan account. If you withdrew your balance, you will receive your share via check by mail unless you elect a rollover to a qualified plan or IRA. Settlement distributions are anticipated in July 2026.
Common questions
- How much does the Wells Fargo ESOP Settlement pay?
- Estimated payout: Share of Net Settlement Fund based on Plan of Allocation after Court-approved deductions, settlement administration expenses, and attorneys' fees. The total settlement fund is $84M. Actual amounts depend on how many valid claims are filed — most settlements divide a fixed fund pro rata, so a higher claim rate means a smaller individual check. An "up to" figure is a cap, not a guarantee.
- Do I need proof of purchase for the Wells Fargo ESOP Settlement?
- No. You can file without a receipt or proof of purchase. You attest that you qualify and submit basic details, though claims are still subject to review and submitting a false claim is a crime.
- Is the Wells Fargo ESOP Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Simpluris is the settlement administrator for this case. Claims are filed at wellsfargoesopsettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Wells Fargo ESOP Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for March 17, 2026; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Peter Morrissey
- Scott Kuhn
- Aryne Randall
- Lawrence Beville
Defendants
- Jane and John Does
- Justin Thornton
- Hope Hardison
- Employee Benefit Review Committee
- Timothy J. Sloan
- Wells Fargo & Co.
- Greatbanc Trust Company
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Brock SpechtNichols Kaster PLLP
- Elizabeth BinczikNichols Kaster, PLLP
- Mary BortschellerFeinberg, Jackson, Worthman & Wasow LLP
- Todd JacksonFeinberg, Jackson, Worthman and Wasow LLP
- Nina WasowFeinberg, Jackson, Worthman & Wasow LLP
- Mark G. BoykoBailey & Glasser
- Laura BabiakBailey & Glasser LLP
- Gregory Y PorterBailey & Glasser LLP
- Daniel FeinbergFeinberg, Jackson, Worthman & Wasow LLP
- Caroline Elizabeth BressmanCohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC
- Steven Andrew SmithNichols Kaster PLLP
- Paul J LukasJackson Lewis PC
Counsel for defendants
- Jeffrey P JustmanFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
- Kiera MurphyFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
- Joseph Emanuel ClarkProskauer Rose LLP
- Myron D. RumeldProskauer Rose LLP
- Tulio D. ChirinosChirinos Law Firm PLLC
- Sydney Juliano
- Russell Laurence HirschhornProskauer Rose LLP
- Richard A DuncanFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
- Isaac B HallFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
- Roger H. StetsonBarack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg LLP
- Nicholas H CallahanBarack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg
- David LurieBarack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg
Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More finance settlements
View all →Brimmer v. City of Overland Special Deterrent Fees Settlement
The City of Overland charged individuals Special Deterrent Fees. The court has approved a settlement requiring the city to refund these fees to eligible class members.
Up to $80
Non-Bank ATM Surcharge Settlement
Visa and Mastercard allegedly violated antitrust laws by creating operating rules that prohibited independent ATM operators from charging lower access fees for transactions on competing networks. This forced cardholders to pay higher ATM surcharges than necessary. Visa and Mastercard deny the claims.
…moreSettlement Fund will be distributed proportionally (pro rata) to each valid claimant after deductions for attorneys' fees (up to 30%), litigation costs, notice and administration costs, and service awards (up to $17,500 per class representative)
Visa and Mastercard ATM Access Fees Class Action Settlement
Visa and Mastercard are accused of charging cardholders excessive access fees for cash withdrawals at independent ATMs (ATMs not owned by Visa, Mastercard, banks, or other financial institutions). Claimants allege the payment networks' operating rules constituted price fixing and violated federal and state antitrust laws by enabling higher ATM fees than should have been charged. Visa and Mastercard deny wrongdoing but have agreed to settle.
…moreEach eligible claimant will receive a share of the net settlement fund based on the number of eligible surcharged transactions they submit.
CFPB v. Tempoe LLC - Consumer Lease Settlement
Tempoe, LLC, a consumer finance leasing company, engaged in unfair and deceptive practices by failing to provide required additional disclosures to consumers whose leases were extended on a month-to-month basis for more than six months after the initial term. On September 11, 2023, the CFPB issued a consent order imposing a permanent ban on consumer leasing and a $2 million penalty.
…more