CClaimWatch
Plaintiff counsel in 8 cases

Christopher Thomas Micheletti

Zelle LLP

Address of record
555 12th Street, Suite 1230, Oakland, CA 94607, 415-693-0700
Email
cmicheletti@zellelaw.com
Phone
(415) 693-0700
Fax
Fax 415-693-0770

Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.

10
Cases tracked
7 active · 3 settled
$264.9M
Plaintiff-side recovery
Disclosed settlement funds
—
Defense-side exposure
Resolved in settlements
3
Cases with values
of 10 tracked

Case history

Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.

CounselActive litigation — no settlement yet

CCell Cannabis Vaporizer Products Antitrust Class Action

A proposed class action alleges that CCell engaged in anticompetitive conduct related to its closed cannabis oil vaporization systems and components. The lawsuit appears to concern pricing, distribution, or other allegedly illegal competitive practices affecting consumers who purchased these vaporization products.

Filed
October 6, 2025
Represents
Peter Hackett
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Branded Beverage Antitrust Class Action

This proposed class action alleges that branded beverage manufacturers engaged in anticompetitive conduct. Based on the caption alone, the case appears to involve allegedly unlawful antitrust practices within the beverage industry that would affect consumers who purchased affected branded beverages.

Filed
August 5, 2025
Represents
Cassidy Lee, Carla Lown, Frederick Rozo, Galinda Wind
CounselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Lamb Weston Frozen Potato Antitrust Class Action

A proposed class action against Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc., apparently alleging antitrust violations in the market for frozen potato products. The docket references 'Consumer Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs,' suggesting that ordinary consumers who purchased potato products may be included as putative class members. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts, and there is no settlement at this stage.

Filed
November 15, 2024
Represents
Michael Juetten, John Murphy
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Visa Debit Card Antitrust Litigation

A proposed class action against Visa Inc., apparently concerning alleged antitrust violations involving Visa debit cards. The docket indicates the private action is being coordinated with a related U.S. Department of Justice case against Visa, and the parties are addressing scheduling. The specific claims are not detailed in this filing, and the allegations have not been proven.

Filed
October 1, 2024
Represents
SK8-BRD-BMX INC.
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

PVC Pipe Antitrust Class Action

This appears to be a proposed class action concerning alleged antitrust violations in the PVC pipe industry. The docket reflects that a purchaser class may be involved, and the parties have discussed a settlement notice plan. The allegations are not proven and no settlement has been finalized.

Filed
August 23, 2024
Represents
Nelson Aviles, Service List
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Eyewear Antitrust Class Action

A proposed class action concerning antitrust issues in the eyewear market. Based on the caption and nature of suit, it appears to allege anticompetitive conduct by one or more eyewear companies, potentially affecting consumers who purchased eyewear. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts and not yet a settlement.

Filed
June 25, 2024
Represents
Frederick Rozo
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Continental Auto Parts Antitrust Class Action

A proposed class action against Continental Aktiengesellschaft, apparently alleging violations of antitrust law. The docket also reflects involvement by Bridgestone Americas, Inc., and indicates the case has been transferred to the Northern District of Ohio for coordinated MDL proceedings. The nature of suit is listed as 410 Anti-Trust, suggesting claims may relate to alleged anticompetitive conduct in the automotive parts industry.

Filed
March 15, 2024
Represents
Phuong Viet Mai
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

Local TV Advertising Settlement

Plaintiffs claimed that broadcaster defendants engaged in a conspiracy to fix, raise, maintain, or stabilize the price levels of broadcast television spot advertising, and that sales rep firms and other entities facilitated communication between them. As a result, plaintiffs allegedly paid artificially inflated prices. The settling defendants deny all wrongdoing but have agreed to settle to avoid the cost and inconvenience of further litigation.

Settlement fund
$48M
Claim deadline
October 26, 2023
Represents
One Source Heating & Cooling, LLC, Thoughtworx, Inc. d/b/a MCM Services Group
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

Tuna Direct Purchaser Antitrust Settlement

Defendants allegedly conspired to fix, raise, and maintain prices that direct purchasers paid for packaged tuna products between June 2011 and July 2015, causing class members to pay more than they otherwise would have. Defendants deny all liability and have agreed to settle to avoid litigation risks, while admitting no wrongdoing.

Settlement fund
$64.8M
Claim deadline
October 18, 2024
Represents
James Walnum, Steven M. Colberg, Michael Juetten, Carla Lown, Scott Caldwell, Diana Mey
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

Tuna End Purchaser Settlement

From June 2011 to July 2015, defendants allegedly participated in an unlawful conspiracy to raise, fix, maintain, or stabilize the price of packaged tuna products at artificially high levels in violation of antitrust and unfair competition laws. The defendants deny many allegations and assert defenses but agreed to settle to avoid further litigation, trial risks, and costs.

Settlement fund
$152.2M
Claim deadline
December 31, 2024
Represents
James Walnum, Steven M. Colberg, Michael Juetten, Carla Lown, Scott Caldwell, Diana Mey

“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.