CClaimWatch
Claims closedNo proof of purchase neededconsumer productsfood beverage

Tuna End Purchaser Settlement

Last verified September 18, 2026Source: jndHow ClaimWatch verifies cases

Closed to new claims since December 31, 2024. Browse open settlements →

Where this case stands

Payments distributed July 27, 2026

The court approved the settlement and the administrator has reported sending payments to class members who filed valid claims.

Before Judge Dana M. Sabraw, U.S. District Court (No. 15-MD-2670 DMS (MSB)).

  1. December 9, 2015
    Case filed
  2. November 8, 2024
    Objection deadline

    Last day to tell the court why the settlement should not be approved.

  3. November 22, 2024
    Final approval hearing

    The court hears any objections and decides whether to approve the settlement.

  4. December 31, 2024
    Claim deadline

    Claims had to be submitted by this date.

  5. July 27, 2026
    Payments distributed

What happened

From June 2011 to July 2015, defendants allegedly participated in an unlawful conspiracy to raise, fix, maintain, or stabilize the price of packaged tuna products at artificially high levels in violation of antitrust and unfair competition laws. The defendants deny many allegations and assert defenses but agreed to settle to avoid further litigation, trial risks, and costs.

Do you qualify?

Anyone who indirectly purchased canned or pouched tuna in packages smaller than 40 ounces for personal consumption (not resale) between June 1, 2011 and July 1, 2015, and resided in Arizona, Arkansas, California, the District of Columbia, Florida, Guam, Hawaii, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, or Wisconsin. Meal kits are excluded. Previously excluded claimants and opt-outs are not eligible.

Who is in the class

all persons and entities who resided in Arizona, Arkansas, California, the District of Columbia, Florida, Guam, Hawaii, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin, who indirectly purchased Packaged Tuna in cans or pouches smaller than forty ounces for end consumption and not for resale, produced by any Defendant or any current or former subsidiary or affiliate thereof, or any co-conspirator during the period from June 1, 2011 to July 1, 2015

Quoted from the settlement notice.

How to file

The claim deadline of December 31, 2024 has passed and no new claims are being accepted. If you filed a claim in the prior COSI Settlement, you automatically received payment without needing to file again. Class members who did not file by the deadline will not receive payment but remain bound by the court's judgment.

Common questions

How much does the Tuna End Purchaser Settlement pay?
The settlement fund is $152.2M.Why settlement checks are smaller than the headline number →
What is the claim deadline for the Tuna End Purchaser Settlement?
Closed to new claims — the deadline was December 31, 2024.
Do I need proof of purchase for the Tuna End Purchaser Settlement?
No. Claims can be filed without a receipt.
What is the status of the Tuna End Purchaser Settlement?
Payments distributed July 27, 2026. The court approved the settlement and the administrator has reported sending payments to class members who filed valid claims.
Is the Tuna End Purchaser Settlement notice real, or a scam?
JND Legal Administration is the court-appointed administrator. Claims are filed only at tunaendpurchasersettlement.com. Filing is always free, and no administrator asks for payment or a full Social Security number by email or text.How to tell a real settlement notice from a scam →
Who are the attorneys in the Tuna End Purchaser Settlement?
For the plaintiffs: Bonny E. Sweeney (Hausfeld LLP); Theodore B. Bell (Mason & Perry LLP); Alex Joseph Tramontano (Rigrodsky Law, P.A.); Rosemary Medellin Rivas (Gibbs Mura LLP). For StarKist, DWI, and Lion Companies: Paul Hollenberg Lazarow (Sullivan & Cromwell LLP); Jason M Ohta (Latham & Watkins); John Robert Robertson (HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP); Christopher D. Lischewski. From the public court docket.

Who's involved

Plaintiffs

  • Truyen David Ton-Vuong
  • The Golub Corporation
  • Fareway Stores, Inc.
  • Simon-Hindi, LLC
  • Woodman's Food Market, Inc.
  • Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs
  • End Payer Plaintiffs
  • United States Department of Justice(Intervenor Plaintiff)

+ 218 more

Defendants

  • Bumble Bee Foods, LLC
  • C&S Wholesale Grocers, Inc.
  • The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company
  • Chicken of the Sea International, Inc.
  • Dongwon Enterprises
  • Thai Union North America, Inc.
  • Thai Union Group Public Company, Ltd.
  • Thai Union Group Public Company

+ 19 more

Counsel for plaintiffs

Counsel for defendants

From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.

Guides:Why is my settlement check so small?How long a settlement takes to pay outIs this settlement notice real, or a scam?

Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.

More consumer products settlements

View all →