Daniel M. Cohen
Cuneo Gilbert & LaDuca, LLP
- Address of record
- 2445 M Street NW, Suite 740, Washington, DC 20037, 202-789-3960
- danielc@cuneolaw.com
- Phone
- (202) 789-3960
Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.
Case history
Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.
Beef Antitrust Settlement
Several beef processors including JBS, Cargill, National Beef, and Tyson Foods allegedly conspired to limit the supply of beef and increase prices. They allegedly entered into a market allocation agreement and stopped competing against each other, with the purpose and effect of increasing their profit margins and the price consumers paid for beef. Tyson Foods and Cargill have settled for a combined $87.5 million.
- Settlement fund
- $87.5M
- Claim deadline
- June 30, 2026
- Represents
- Commercial and Institutional Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs
AMEX Antitrust Settlement
American Express had rules in its merchant agreements that prohibited merchants from encouraging customers to pay with a different card that charged lower fees. Plaintiffs alleged these anti-steering rules caused merchants to raise prices to cover Amex fees, resulting in all customers—including those not using Amex cards—paying more. American Express denies wrongdoing.
- Settlement fund
- $17.5M
- Claim deadline
- May 19, 2026
- Represents
- Anthony Oliver, Terry Gayle Quinton, Shawn O'Keefe, Andrew Amend, Susan Burdette, Gianna Valdes, David Moskowitz, Zachary Draper, Nate Thayer, Michael Thomas Reid, Gary Accord, Ricky Amaro, Nanci-Taylor Maddux, Abigail Baker, Wyatt Cooper, James Robbins IV, Joseph Realdine, Marilyn Baker, Sherie McCaffrey, Allie Stewart, Ellen Maher, Debbie Tingle, Angela Clark, Emily Counts, Sarah Grant
Tuna Direct Purchaser Antitrust Settlement
Defendants allegedly conspired to fix, raise, and maintain prices that direct purchasers paid for packaged tuna products between June 2011 and July 2015, causing class members to pay more than they otherwise would have. Defendants deny all liability and have agreed to settle to avoid litigation risks, while admitting no wrongdoing.
- Settlement fund
- $64.8M
- Claim deadline
- October 18, 2024
- Represents
- Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs
Tuna End Purchaser Settlement
From June 2011 to July 2015, defendants allegedly participated in an unlawful conspiracy to raise, fix, maintain, or stabilize the price of packaged tuna products at artificially high levels in violation of antitrust and unfair competition laws. The defendants deny many allegations and assert defenses but agreed to settle to avoid further litigation, trial risks, and costs.
- Settlement fund
- $152.2M
- Claim deadline
- December 31, 2024
- Represents
- Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs
“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.