Jon Anders Tostrud
Tostrud Law Group PC
- Address of record
- 1925 Century Park East, Suite 2125, Los Angeles, CA 90067, 310-278-2600
- Phone
- (310) 278-2600
- Fax
- Fax 310-278-2640
Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.
Case history
Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.
Archery Products Antitrust Class Action
A proposed class action alleges that defendants engaged in anticompetitive conduct related to archery products, apparently involving price-fixing, market allocation, or other antitrust violations. The case has been designated as multidistrict litigation, suggesting multiple related claims have been consolidated in federal court in Colorado.
- Filed
- October 16, 2025
- Represents
- Matt Simcik
Farmers Security Incident Class Action
This proposed class action concerns an alleged security incident involving Farmers, apparently affecting personal information of customers or policyholders. The case appears to involve claims related to data protection and privacy violations arising from the security breach.
- Filed
- August 24, 2025
- Represents
- Christina Scorio
PowerSchool Customer Data Breach Class Action
A proposed class action against PowerSchool Holdings, Inc. and PowerSchool Group, LLC, apparently concerning a customer data security breach. The case is pending as multidistrict litigation, and the allegations likely relate to the companies' handling of customer personal information.
- Filed
- April 8, 2025
- Represents
- Jerathen Tillman
Lamb Weston Frozen Potato Antitrust Class Action
A proposed class action against Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc., apparently alleging antitrust violations in the market for frozen potato products. The docket references 'Consumer Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs,' suggesting that ordinary consumers who purchased potato products may be included as putative class members. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts, and there is no settlement at this stage.
- Filed
- November 15, 2024
- Represents
- Jack Tate
PVC Pipe Antitrust Class Action
This appears to be a proposed class action concerning alleged antitrust violations in the PVC pipe industry. The docket reflects that a purchaser class may be involved, and the parties have discussed a settlement notice plan. The allegations are not proven and no settlement has been finalized.
- Filed
- August 23, 2024
- Represents
- George Bavolak
Fortra File Transfer Software Data Breach Settlement
Defendants used Fortra's file transfer service, which suffered a criminal cyberattack on or about January 30, 2023. The breach resulted in unauthorized access to approximately five million individuals' personal and health insurance information, including names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and health plan details. Defendants are paying $20 million to resolve claims arising from this data incident.
- Settlement fund
- $20M
- Claim deadline
- August 29, 2025
- Represents
- Anthony Ndifor
Lynn Scott v. Grubhub Settlement
In October 2020, a class action lawsuit was filed against Grubhub alleging that thousands of businesses were listed on Grubhub's food delivery platforms (including Eat24, Seamless, and others) without contracts in place. Plaintiffs claim this misled consumers into believing the businesses had agreed to be listed and caused damage to the businesses' reputations and sales. Grubhub denies wrongdoing.
- Claim deadline
- March 4, 2026
- Represents
- Jack Tate
Tuna Direct Purchaser Antitrust Settlement
Defendants allegedly conspired to fix, raise, and maintain prices that direct purchasers paid for packaged tuna products between June 2011 and July 2015, causing class members to pay more than they otherwise would have. Defendants deny all liability and have agreed to settle to avoid litigation risks, while admitting no wrongdoing.
- Settlement fund
- $64.8M
- Claim deadline
- October 18, 2024
- Represents
- Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs
Tuna End Purchaser Settlement
From June 2011 to July 2015, defendants allegedly participated in an unlawful conspiracy to raise, fix, maintain, or stabilize the price of packaged tuna products at artificially high levels in violation of antitrust and unfair competition laws. The defendants deny many allegations and assert defenses but agreed to settle to avoid further litigation, trial risks, and costs.
- Settlement fund
- $152.2M
- Claim deadline
- December 31, 2024
- Represents
- Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs
“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.