Lynn Scott v. Grubhub Settlement
Last verified July 13, 2026Source: claimdepotHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was March 4, 2026. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
In October 2020, a class action lawsuit was filed against Grubhub alleging that thousands of businesses were listed on Grubhub's food delivery platforms (including Eat24, Seamless, and others) without contracts in place. Plaintiffs claim this misled consumers into believing the businesses had agreed to be listed and caused damage to the businesses' reputations and sales. Grubhub denies wrongdoing.
Do you qualify?
Businesses whose names or logos were listed on Grubhub-affiliated food delivery platforms (Grubhub, Eat24, Tapingo, OrderUp, Seamless, LevelUp, AllMenus, MenuPages, and BiteGrabber) without a contract between January 1, 2019 and April 30, 2024.
How to file
Submit a Claim Form by March 4, 2026. The website indicates claims are no longer being accepted as of the claim deadline date. Detailed filing instructions and required documentation are available on the settlement website at https://www.restaurantlistingsettlement.com/submit-a-claim.
Common questions
- What is the claim deadline for the Lynn Scott v. Grubhub Settlement?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was March 4, 2026. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Is the Lynn Scott v. Grubhub Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Claims are filed at restaurantlistingsettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Lynn Scott v. Grubhub Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for April 15, 2026; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Jack Tate
- MDR, LLC
- La Mesa LLC
- MF Tasty LLC
- Old Crown, Inc.
- MomoBBQ, Co., LLC
- Iowa City Coffee Company
- 132 Degrees, LLC
+ 3 more
Defendants
- Grubhub Inc.
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Joshua BloomfieldGibbs Law Group LLP
- Jon TostrudTostrud Law Group, P.c.
- Charles J. LaDucaCuneo Gilbert & LaDuca, LLP
- Brendan S ThompsonCuneo Gilbert & LaDuca LLP
- Anthony CarterTostrud Law Group, P.c.
- Emily E. BealeGibbs Mura LLP
- Jonathan David LindenfeldFegan Scott LLC
- Robert Kinney ShelquistCuneo Gilbert Flannery & LaDuca LLP
- Brian Eric Johnson
- Rosemary M. RivasGibbs Mura LLP
- Emily Wynne TidwellGibbs Mura LLP
- Amanda M. KarlGibbs Mura LLP
- Elizabeth A. FeganFegan Scott, LLC
- Steven M. TindallGibbs Mura LLP
- Geoffrey Munroe
- Alexander J. BukacSideman & Bancroft LLP
Counsel for defendants
- Matthew R LighthouseIce Miller LLP
- Sophie E.H. RayzorTaft Stettinius & Hollister, LLP
- Rachel SmootTaft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
- Allison Olivia LiftonIce Miller Llp
- Yogini PatelSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom Llp
- Colm McInerney , ISkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
- Charles F. Smith , Jr.Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom, LLP CH
- Isaac J. ColungaTaft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
- Alice Ann KellyIce Miller LLP
- Michael W. McTigue , Jr.Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
- Meredith C SlaweSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
- Jack J. CarriglioCozen O'Connor
Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.
In the news
- FTC Is Sending $23,800,000 to 640,000 Consumers Over Grubhub SettlementThe Daily Hodl · August 15, 2026
- Pay a Grubhub Junk Fee? FTC Sending Out $23.8M in Settlement ChecksPCMag.com · August 12, 2026
- Grubhub’s $24M FTC settlement is finally reaching diners and driversBiztoc.com · August 12, 2026
- New Jersey Man Sues Jersey Mike’s And Grubhub After Finding Teeth In His Cheesesteak SandwichBroBible · June 29, 2026
Headlines via NewsAPI. ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with these publications.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Schnucks Markets Sales Tax Settlement
Schnucks Markets allegedly illegally charged sales tax on the full retail price of purchases before applying rewards points discounts, instead of calculating tax on the discounted price. The lawsuit claims Schnucks misled customers about the tax calculation and collected excess tax revenue.
…moreUp to $7
Skin360 BIPA Settlement
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. allegedly violated Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting, storing, disclosing, and profiting from biometric identifiers and information from people who scanned their faces during Skin360 skin assessments without providing required written disclosures and obtaining written consent. The defendant denies wrongdoing and admits no violation.
…moreEqual payment to all valid claimants from the $4.7 million Settlement Fund, minus Settlement Administrator costs, attorneys' fees (up to one-third of the fund), and service payments to Class Representatives (up to $5,000 each)
Dr. Squatch Products Class Action Settlement
Plaintiffs alleged that Dr. Squatch represented certain shampoo, conditioner, deodorant, soap and other personal care products as natural when they contained synthetic ingredients. Dr. Squatch denies wrongdoing and maintains the products were properly labeled. The parties settled to avoid the costs and uncertainty of litigation.
…moreYour payment will be calculated pro rata based on the number of valid claim forms submitted by the settlement class.
Thinkware Dashcam Settlement
Thinkware Systems USA, Inc. is accused of misrepresenting and falsely advertising that its dashcam models featured a "Super Night Vision" function, while failing to disclose that this function was only available in parking mode. The defendant denies these allegations and wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid further litigation.
…morePro rata payment based on number of valid claims submitted