CClaimWatch
Plaintiff counsel in 13 cases

Rosemary Medellin Rivas

Gibbs Mura LLP

Address of record
1111 Broadway, Suite 2100, Oakland, CA 94607, 510-350-9700
Email
rmr@classlawgroup.com
Phone
(510) 350-9700
Fax
Fax 510-350-9701

Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.

13
Cases tracked
6 active · 7 settled
$382.4M
Plaintiff-side recovery
Disclosed settlement funds
—
Defense-side exposure
Resolved in settlements
5
Cases with values
of 13 tracked

Case history

Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.

Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

McCollum v. Circle Internet Group Data Breach Class Action

This proposed class action alleges that Circle Internet Group, Inc. mishandled personal property or data belonging to consumers. While limited details are available from the docket metadata, the personal property nature of suit suggests claims potentially involving unauthorized access, loss, or misuse of consumer information or assets.

Filed
April 14, 2026
Represents
Joshua McCollum, Oakford Crawson LLC, Jeffrey Magoveny, Ng Boon Min, Lim Teck Yeow, Alexej Kravetsker, Michael Medovoj
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Volkswagen Vehicle Defect Class Action

A proposed class action against Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., apparently concerning alleged fraud and breach of express warranty related to a design defect in vehicles. The court recently ruled on a motion to dismiss, allowing most claims to proceed while dismissing part of the express warranty claim based on the alleged design defect. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts.

Filed
January 7, 2025
Represents
Dwight Kelly
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Porsche Cars N.A. Consumer Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action against Porsche Cars N.A., Inc. The plaintiffs assert claims for fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of express warranty, apparently relating to Porsche vehicles and statements or warranties about them. These are allegations in litigation; no class has been certified and no liability has been established.

Filed
November 29, 2024
Represents
Miodrag Kukrika
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

PNC Investments Breach of Contract Class Action

A proposed class action against PNC Investments, LLC, apparently asserting claims for breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and unjust enrichment. The court has dismissed the fiduciary-duty, implied-covenant, and unjust-enrichment claims, while allowing the breach-of-contract claim to proceed, with leave to amend certain claims against PNC Financial Services Group. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts and not yet a settlement.

Filed
September 11, 2024
Represents
MANUEL VALLIN, JOEL BROWNE, Marlene Dehner
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

LPL Financial Class Action

A proposed class action against LPL Financial LLC, apparently concerning contract-related claims (Nature of Suit 190 Contract: Other). The specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket metadata.

Filed
August 20, 2024
Represents
Hieu Vu
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Wells Fargo Cash Sweep Class Action

A proposed class action against Wells Fargo, apparently concerning its cash sweep program. The docket indicates a contract dispute, but specific allegations are not detailed in the available metadata.

Filed
July 30, 2024
Represents
Daniel Gruber, Karen Schreiman, Daniel Varady
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

Lynn Scott v. Grubhub Settlement

In October 2020, a class action lawsuit was filed against Grubhub alleging that thousands of businesses were listed on Grubhub's food delivery platforms (including Eat24, Seamless, and others) without contracts in place. Plaintiffs claim this misled consumers into believing the businesses had agreed to be listed and caused damage to the businesses' reputations and sales. Grubhub denies wrongdoing.

Claim deadline
March 4, 2026
Represents
Lynn Scott, LLC, Farmer's Wife, LLC, The
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

Evenflo Big Kid Booster Seat Settlement

Evenflo allegedly misled consumers by labeling and advertising its "Big Kid" booster seats as "side impact tested" and safe for children weighing 30 pounds or more, when the company claims the labeling and advertising was not misleading and denies any wrongdoing. The parties settled to avoid the cost and risk of continued litigation.

Settlement fund
$3.5M
Claim deadline
November 24, 2025
Represents
Mona Sanchez
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

ZF-TRW Airbag Control Units Products Liability Settlement

Consumer plaintiffs allege that defective Airbag Control Units in approximately 12.3 million vehicles may cause airbags to fail to inflate in the event of a crash. Settlements have been reached with multiple vehicle manufacturers including Toyota, Mitsubishi, Hyundai, and Kia.

Settlement fund
$62M
Claim deadline
Represents
Hamilton Livery Leasing LLC, Joy Davis
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

PG&E Corporation Securities Litigation Settlement

PG&E Corporation issued certain securities during the Class Period. Plaintiffs alleged they were damaged by misrepresentations or omissions regarding PG&E's business during this time. The defendant has agreed to settle the claims for $100 million without admitting wrongdoing.

Settlement fund
$100M
Claim deadline
July 6, 2026
Represents
David C. Weston
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

Rodan + Fields Lash Boost Settlement

Rodan + Fields marketed and sold its Lash Boost eye serum with deceptive labeling and unlawful marketing while failing to disclose harmful side effects from an ingredient called isopropyl cloprostenate, a prostaglandin analog. The company, founded by two dermatologists, is paying to resolve claims including RICO violations and consumer protection violations.

Claim deadline
Represents
Bobbie Joe Huling, Elissa Wagner, Melissa Ryan
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

Tuna Direct Purchaser Antitrust Settlement

Defendants allegedly conspired to fix, raise, and maintain prices that direct purchasers paid for packaged tuna products between June 2011 and July 2015, causing class members to pay more than they otherwise would have. Defendants deny all liability and have agreed to settle to avoid litigation risks, while admitting no wrongdoing.

Settlement fund
$64.8M
Claim deadline
October 18, 2024
Represents
Rick Musgrave
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

Tuna End Purchaser Settlement

From June 2011 to July 2015, defendants allegedly participated in an unlawful conspiracy to raise, fix, maintain, or stabilize the price of packaged tuna products at artificially high levels in violation of antitrust and unfair competition laws. The defendants deny many allegations and assert defenses but agreed to settle to avoid further litigation, trial risks, and costs.

Settlement fund
$152.2M
Claim deadline
December 31, 2024
Represents
Rick Musgrave

“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.