Rodan + Fields Lash Boost Litigation Settlement
Last verified September 4, 2026Source: law-firm:keller-rohrbackHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Rodan & Fields marketed and sold Lash Boost eye serum with allegedly deceptive labeling and unlawful marketing, failing to disclose harmful side effects of an ingredient called isopropyl cloprostenate, a prostaglandin analog.
Do you qualify?
Consumers who purchased Rodan & Fields Lash Boost between October 1, 2016 and March 11, 2022.
How to file
Submit a claim for compensation from the settlement by visiting https://www.lbsettlement.com/Home/SubmitClaim. Additional information about settlement terms is available at https://www.lbsettlement.com/Home/FAQ.
Common questions
- Is the Rodan + Fields Lash Boost Litigation Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Claims are filed at lbsettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Rodan + Fields Lash Boost Litigation Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for September 28, 2022; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.
In the news
- The Controversy Over the Rodan + Fields Lash Serum, ExplainedAllure · April 22, 2022
- Rodan + Fields faces another lawsuit over eyelash enhancerWSAW · May 14, 2018
- More lawsuits for Lash Boost seller Rodan + FieldsCBS News · May 11, 2018
- Rodan + Fields, the Beauty Brand Your Facebook Friends Are Always Pushing, Is Facing a Class-Action SuitRacked.com · April 17, 2018
Headlines via NewsAPI. ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with these publications.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Calverton Park Vehicle Towing Settlement
The City of Calverton Park towed vehicles from private property and charged owners fines and fees, including special tax bills, alleging violations of a municipal nuisance ordinance. The defendants deny any wrongdoing or liability.
The amount of your payment will depend on whether you were able to recover your vehicle from the tow lot; the number of days your vehicle was impounded before release; and the total costs of fines and fees, including the Special Tax Bill, you paid to the City of Calverton Park or the tow lot.
Dr. Squatch Natural Products Class Action Settlement
Dr. Squatch represented that certain of its shampoo, conditioner, deodorant, soap, and other personal care products were natural even though they contained ingredients the plaintiffs allege were synthetic. Dr. Squatch has denied the allegations and maintains the products were properly labeled. The company agreed to settle the lawsuit without admitting wrongdoing or liability to avoid the burden and expense of further litigation.
Pro rata share based on the number of valid claim forms submitted
Service Spot Settlement - ParkOn.com and CheapAirportParking.org Reservation Fee
Service Spot, LLC and TripGate LLC allegedly failed to properly disclose a mandatory Reservation Fee for online bookings on ParkOn.com and CheapAirportParking.org in violation of California's Honest Pricing Law. The defendants deny they violated any law but agreed to settle to avoid further litigation costs.
Pro rata portion of the Settlement Fund based on the total amount of processing fees paid
Kroger Rx Savings Club Settlement
Kroger is accused of failing to consider its discounted Rx Savings Club or Health Savings Club prices when determining its usual and customary (U&C) prices submitted to insurance companies for prescription drug claims. Plaintiffs allege this resulted in customers overpaying their insurance copays and coinsurance. Kroger denies wrongdoing and maintains it correctly reported its retail prices as U&C prices. The court has not decided who is right.
Payments calculated based on the amount a claimant paid for one or more prescription drugs from Kroger using insurance during the Settlement Class Period (December 9, 2018 through August 23, 2026).