CClaimWatch
Plaintiff counsel in 4 cases

PETER GEORGE SAFIRSTEIN

Safirstein Law LLC

Address of record
45 North Broad Street Suite 100, Ridgewood, NJ 07450, 917-952-9458
Email
psafirstein@safirsteinlaw.com
Phone
(917) 952-9458

Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.

5
Cases tracked
1 active · 4 settled
$278.9M
Plaintiff-side recovery
Disclosed settlement funds
—
Defense-side exposure
Resolved in settlements
4
Cases with values
of 5 tracked

Case history

Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.

Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

GoodRx and Pharmacy Benefit Manager Antitrust Class Action

This appears to be a proposed class action against GoodRx and pharmacy benefit managers, apparently alleging antitrust violations. The case was recently filed, and the docket does not yet provide details of the alleged conduct, but it may concern pricing or competition issues affecting consumers of prescription drugs.

Filed
April 17, 2025
Represents
Esco Drug Co.
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

ZF-TRW Airbag Control Units Products Liability Settlement

Consumer plaintiffs allege that defective Airbag Control Units in approximately 12.3 million vehicles may cause airbags to fail to inflate in the event of a crash. Settlements have been reached with multiple vehicle manufacturers including Toyota, Mitsubishi, Hyundai, and Kia.

Settlement fund
$62M
Claim deadline
Represents
Michael Van Ness
CounselSettled — claims closed

Perrigo Securities Litigation Settlement

Perrigo and former CEO Joseph C. Papa made false and misleading statements about the performance and integration of Omega Pharma N.V., which Perrigo acquired in early 2015, and about Perrigo's pricing strategy, noncompetitive practices, and the competitive environment for its generic prescription drug unit, in violation of federal securities laws. The defendants settled for $97,000,000 without admitting wrongdoing.

Settlement fund
$97M
Claim deadline
Represents
MICHAEL WILSON
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

Tuna Direct Purchaser Antitrust Settlement

Defendants allegedly conspired to fix, raise, and maintain prices that direct purchasers paid for packaged tuna products between June 2011 and July 2015, causing class members to pay more than they otherwise would have. Defendants deny all liability and have agreed to settle to avoid litigation risks, while admitting no wrongdoing.

Settlement fund
$64.8M
Claim deadline
October 18, 2024
Represents
Jeffrey Potvin, Stephanie Gipson
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

Tuna End Purchaser Settlement

From June 2011 to July 2015, defendants allegedly participated in an unlawful conspiracy to raise, fix, maintain, or stabilize the price of packaged tuna products at artificially high levels in violation of antitrust and unfair competition laws. The defendants deny many allegations and assert defenses but agreed to settle to avoid further litigation, trial risks, and costs.

Settlement fund
$152.2M
Claim deadline
December 31, 2024
Represents
Jeffrey Potvin, Stephanie Gipson

“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.