David Ramraj Singh
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
- Address of record
- 201 Redwood Shores Parkway 4th Floor, Redwood Shores, CA 94065, 650-802-3000
- david.singh@weil.com
- Phone
- (650) 802-3000
- Fax
- Fax 6650-802-3100
Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.
Case history
Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.
Anthropic Contract Class Action
A proposed class action has been filed against Anthropic, PBC alleging breach of contract. The specific nature of the contractual claims cannot be determined from the docket entries provided, which contain only filing metadata. Additional details regarding the alleged contract terms and damages would typically be found in the full complaint document itself.
- Filed
- July 24, 2026
- Represents
- Anthropic, PBC
Burke v. Apple Product Liability Class Action
A proposed class action against Apple, Inc. concerning alleged product liability claims. The nature of suit indicates a personal injury matter potentially involving a defective Apple product, though specific details about the alleged defect or injury are not available from the docket metadata provided.
- Filed
- May 1, 2026
- Represents
- Apple, Inc.
White v. CBS Interactive Class Action
A proposed class action filed against CBS Interactive Inc. in the Northern District of California. The case is designated as "Other Statutory Actions" but specific allegations cannot be determined from the docket information provided; further court filings would be needed to clarify the consumer claims at issue.
- Filed
- April 9, 2026
- Represents
- CBS Interactive Inc.
GameStop Consumer Fraud Class Action
A proposed class action against GameStop alleging fraud, apparently concerning consumer transactions or practices. The specific factual allegations are not available from the docket metadata provided, but the nature of suit code suggests claims of deceptive or fraudulent conduct affecting consumers.
- Filed
- January 8, 2026
- Represents
- GameStop, Inc.
Apple Fraud Class Action
A proposed class action against Apple Inc. alleging fraud. While the specific nature of the fraud allegations cannot be determined from the available docket information, the case involves claims under general fraud statutes that could affect ordinary consumers.
- Filed
- September 11, 2025
- Represents
- Apple Inc., Apple Value Services, LLC
Maggio v. Procter & Gamble Fraud Class Action
A proposed class action alleges fraud by Procter & Gamble, though the specific nature of the alleged fraud is not detailed in the available docket information. As a newly filed case, these are allegations only and have not been proven or settled.
- Filed
- August 14, 2025
- Represents
- The Procter & Gamble Company
Procter & Gamble Protect Grow and Restore Marketing Practices Class Action
A proposed class action against Procter & Gamble Company alleging fraudulent marketing and sales practices related to its Protect Grow and Restore product line. The lawsuit apparently concerns allegedly deceptive or unfair marketing claims made to consumers purchasing these products.
- Filed
- August 7, 2025
- Represents
- Proctor & Gamble Company
California Interscholastic Federation Antitrust Class Action
A proposed class action against the California Interscholastic Federation, apparently concerning antitrust claims related to lost compensation. The court recently granted a motion to dismiss with leave to amend, finding that the plaintiffs had not adequately alleged a relevant market or antitrust injury. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts and not a settlement.
- Filed
- May 30, 2025
- Represents
- 2080 Media, Inc. dba PlayOn! Sports, Huddle Tickets, LLC, NFHS Network, LLC, MaxPreps, Inc., VNN, Inc.
GoodRx and Pharmacy Benefit Manager Antitrust Class Action
This appears to be a proposed class action against GoodRx and pharmacy benefit managers, apparently alleging antitrust violations. The case was recently filed, and the docket does not yet provide details of the alleged conduct, but it may concern pricing or competition issues affecting consumers of prescription drugs.
- Filed
- April 17, 2025
- Represents
- GoodRx, Inc., GoodRx Holdings, Inc.
Gannett Internet Tracking Class Action
A proposed class action against Gannett Co., Inc., apparently concerning allegations that the company tracked internet users' online activity without proper consent. The docket indicates this case has been consolidated into In re Gannett Co. Internet Tracking Litigation, and the court is in the process of appointing interim class counsel. These are allegations in a newly filed case and have not been proven.
- Filed
- December 4, 2024
- Represents
- Gannett Co., Inc.
GoodRx Antitrust Class Action
A proposed class action against GoodRx, Inc. apparently asserting antitrust claims. The docket text does not detail the specific allegations, but the case has been transferred to MDL 3148, indicating coordinated proceedings involving GoodRx. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts.
- Filed
- November 14, 2024
- Represents
- GoodRx, Inc., GoodRx Holdings, Inc.
Scripps Networks Consumer Class Action
This is a proposed class action against Scripps Networks, LLC, apparently concerning alleged statutory violations. The specific allegations are not described in the available docket text, so the exact nature of the claims is unclear. These are allegations only, not proven facts and not yet a settlement.
- Filed
- October 28, 2024
- Represents
- Scripps Networks, LLC
USA Today Internet Tracking Class Action
A proposed class action against USA Today Co., Inc. apparently concerning internet tracking of users. The case is captioned as litigation over internet tracking, and the nature of suit is personal injury product liability. The allegations likely involve claims that the company unlawfully tracked users online, but specific details are not available from the docket text.
- Filed
- August 14, 2024
- Represents
- Gannett Co. Inc.
Lululemon Statutory Class Action
This is a newly filed putative class action against Lululemon USA Inc. Based on the limited docket information, the case appears to involve alleged violations of a federal statute, but the specific claims are not described in the caption or nature-of-suit code. These are allegations only, not proven facts.
- Filed
- July 12, 2024
- Represents
- Lululemon USA Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc.
“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.