Gannett Internet Tracking Class Action
Last verified October 1, 2026Source: courtlistener-litigationHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, N.D. California (No. 3:24-cv-08742).
- December 4, 2024Case filed
What happened
A proposed class action against Gannett Co., Inc., apparently concerning allegations that the company tracked internet users' online activity without proper consent. The docket indicates this case has been consolidated into In re Gannett Co. Internet Tracking Litigation, and the court is in the process of appointing interim class counsel. These are allegations in a newly filed case and have not been proven.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Gannett Internet Tracking Class Action case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed December 4, 2024 in the District Court, N.D. California (No. 3:24-cv-08742).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the Gannett Internet Tracking Class Action?
- For the plaintiffs: Timothy Douglas Cohelan (Cohelan Khoury & Singer); Patrick Nathaniel Keegan (Keegan & Baker, LLP); Isam Charles Khoury (Cohelan Khoury & Singer). For Gannett Co., Inc.: David Ramraj Singh (Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP); Blake Jacob Steinberg (Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP); David L. Yohai (Weil, Gotshal, & Manges, LLP). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- John Deddeh
Defendants
- Gannett Co., Inc.
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Timothy Douglas CohelanCohelan Khoury & SingerRepresents John Deddeh6 tracked casestcohelan@ckslaw.com · (619) 595-3001
- Patrick Nathaniel KeeganKeegan & Baker, LLPRepresents John Deddeh12 tracked cases · $475,000 in disclosed settlementspkeegan@keeganbaker.com · (760) 929-9303
- Isam Charles KhouryCohelan Khoury & SingerRepresents John Deddeh9 tracked casesikhoury@ckslaw.com · (619) 595-3001
Counsel for defendants
- David Ramraj SinghWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPRepresents Gannett Co., Inc.12 tracked casesdavid.singh@weil.com · (650) 802-3000
- Blake Jacob SteinbergWeil Gotshal & Manges LLPRepresents Gannett Co., Inc.4 tracked casesblake.steinberg@weil.com · (212) 310-8494
- David L. YohaiWeil, Gotshal, & Manges, LLPRepresents Gannett Co., Inc.2 tracked casesdavid.yohai@weil.com · (212) 310-8275
Other cases these firms appear in
- Color Image Apparel Consumer Fraud Class Action · Cohelan Khoury & Singer
- Langer Juice Fraud Class Action · Cohelan Khoury & Singer
- Blue Shield of California Privacy Class Action · Cohelan Khoury & Singer
- Nexstar Media Product Liability Class Action · Cohelan Khoury & Singer
- Total Vision Data Breach Settlement · Keegan & Baker, LLP
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
In the news
- Judge tosses Trump's lawsuit against Des Moines RegisterBiztoc.com · September 23, 2026
- Judge dismisses Trump’s lawsuit against Des Moines Register and pollster J. Ann Selzer | CNN BusinessCNN · September 23, 2026
- Publisher Gannett Wins Dismissal of Nearly All of Journalists’ Job Bias LawsuitInsurance Journal · September 5, 2025
- The Right is Hell-Bent on Weaponizing Libel LawThe New Republic · March 4, 2025
Headlines via NewsAPI.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.
More privacy settlements
View all →Lands' End Data Breach Settlement
Forbes Media Website Tracker Class Action Settlement
Pro rata payments from the Settlement Fund after deductions for administration costs, court-awarded attorneys' fees and costs, and incentive awards
American Vision Partners Data Breach Settlement
Pro-rata cash payments or out-of-pocket expense claims for Damages Settlement Class Members
Skin360 BIPA Settlement
Equal payment to all valid claimants from the $4.7 million Settlement Fund, minus Settlement Administrator costs, attorneys' fees (up to one-third of the fund), and service payments to Class Representatives (up to $5,000 each)