CClaimWatch
In litigation — no settlement yetprivacy

USA Today Internet Tracking Class Action

Last verified October 9, 2026Source: courtlistener-litigationHow ClaimWatch verifies cases

Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.

Where this case stands

In litigation

The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.

Pending in the District Court, N.D. California (No. 3:24-cv-05150).

  1. August 14, 2024
    Case filed

What happened

A proposed class action against USA Today Co., Inc. apparently concerning internet tracking of users. The case is captioned as litigation over internet tracking, and the nature of suit is personal injury product liability. The allegations likely involve claims that the company unlawfully tracked users online, but specific details are not available from the docket text.

Do you qualify?

No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.

How to file

There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.

Common questions

Can I file a claim in the USA Today Internet Tracking Class Action case?
No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed August 14, 2024 in the District Court, N.D. California (No. 3:24-cv-05150).What a class action lawsuit is →
Who are the attorneys in the USA Today Internet Tracking Class Action?
For the plaintiffs: Timothy Douglas Cohelan (Cohelan Khoury & Singer); Patrick Nathaniel Keegan (Keegan & Baker, LLP); Isam Charles Khoury (Cohelan Khoury & Singer); Scot Bernstein (Law Offices of Scot D. Bernstein). For USA Today Co., Inc.: David L. Yohai (Weil, Gotshal, & Manges, LLP); Blake Jacob Steinberg (Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP); Amy Tu Quyen Le; David Ramraj Singh (Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP). From the public court docket.

Who's involved

Plaintiffs

  • John Deddeh
  • Saber Khamooshi
  • Ryan Wu

Defendants

  • Gannett Co. Inc.

Counsel for plaintiffs

Counsel for defendants

Other cases these firms appear in

From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.

Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member

Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.

More privacy settlements

View all →
November 9, 2026privacy

Forbes Media Website Tracker Class Action Settlement

Pro rata payments from the Settlement Fund after deductions for administration costs, court-awarded attorneys' fees and costs, and incentive awards

November 12, 2026data breach

American Vision Partners Data Breach Settlement

Pro-rata cash payments or out-of-pocket expense claims for Damages Settlement Class Members

November 25, 2026No proof neededprivacy

Skin360 BIPA Settlement

Equal payment to all valid claimants from the $4.7 million Settlement Fund, minus Settlement Administrator costs, attorneys' fees (up to one-third of the fund), and service payments to Class Representatives (up to $5,000 each)

December 7, 2026privacy

Wayne Memorial Hospital Data Breach Settlement