CClaimWatch
Plaintiff counsel in 15 cases

JOHN J. RIZIO-HAMILTON

Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP

Address of record
1251 Avenue of the Americas, 44th Fl., New York, NY 10020, (212) 554-1400
Email
johnr@blbglaw.com
Phone
(212) 554-1400
Fax
Fax 212-554-1444

Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.

15
Cases tracked
9 active · 6 settled
$333.5M
Plaintiff-side recovery
Disclosed settlement funds
—
Defense-side exposure
Resolved in settlements
6
Cases with values
of 15 tracked

Case history

Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.

Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

Viacom Archegos Securities Litigation Settlement

Defendants allegedly violated the Securities Act by disseminating offering materials for ViacomCBS Inc.'s March 2021 secondary public offering of Class B common stock and initial public offering of Viacom 5.75% Series A Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock that contained false and misleading statements and omitted required disclosures. Defendants have agreed to settle for $120 million without admitting wrongdoing.

Settlement fund
$120M
Claim deadline
August 22, 2025
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Charles Schwab Cash Sweep Program Class Action

A proposed class action against The Charles Schwab Corporation, apparently concerning the company's cash sweep programs. The lawsuit appears to allege that Schwab breached its contracts with customers in connection with how cash balances were swept into interest-bearing accounts. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts and not yet a settlement.

Filed
September 30, 2024
Represents
Michael Davis, Terrance TJ McDonald
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

LPL Financial Contract Class Action

A proposed class action against LPL Financial Holdings Inc. The docket text indicates a contract dispute (Nature of Suit 190) but does not include the specific allegations. The case appears to concern contractual claims related to the defendant's financial services business.

Filed
September 26, 2024
Represents
Carol White
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

UBS Financial Services Contract Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against UBS Financial Services Inc. in federal court in New York. The docket classifies the case as a contract dispute, but the provided docket entries do not detail the specific allegations. The claims appear to concern contract-related issues involving the financial services company. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts.

Filed
September 3, 2024
Represents
Andrew Davitt
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Charles Schwab Customer Account Class Action

A proposed class action against The Charles Schwab Corporation and affiliated TD Ameritrade entities. Based on the contract nature of suit, the case appears to concern customer brokerage or investment account agreements, possibly involving fees or account handling, though the available docket text does not detail the specific claims. The allegations are unproven and no settlement is indicated.

Filed
August 28, 2024
Represents
Michael Davis, Terrance TJ McDonald
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Raymond James Financial Contract Class Action

A proposed class action against Raymond James Financial, Inc., apparently concerning contract claims. The nature of suit is 'Contract: Other,' suggesting allegations related to contractual obligations, but specific details are not provided.

Filed
August 27, 2024
Represents
Toni Conran
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

JPMorgan Chase Consumer Contract Class Action

A proposed class action against JPMorgan Chase & Co. appears to involve a contract dispute. The docket text does not provide specific factual allegations, but the nature of suit is 'Contract: Other,' and the defendant is a large bank, suggesting the case may concern consumer or account-holder contracts. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts.

Filed
August 23, 2024
Represents
Dan Bodea
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

UBS Financial Services Class Action

This is a proposed class action against UBS Financial Services Inc., apparently brought by account holders. The docket reflects a consolidated class action complaint asserting claims for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and breach of fiduciary duty. An unjust enrichment claim was dismissed without prejudice, while the remaining contract and fiduciary duty claims were allowed to proceed at the motion to dismiss stage.

Filed
August 22, 2024
Represents
Kelly Goldsmith, Andrew Davitt
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Ameriprise Financial Consumer Class Action

This appears to be a proposed class action against Ameriprise Financial, Inc., filed in the District of Minnesota. The docket lists the nature of suit as "Personal Property: Other" but provides no further detail about the specific allegations. Because the case was surfaced as a class-action complaint, it may involve consumer financial services or account holders, but the exact claims are unclear from the available metadata.

Filed
July 29, 2024
Represents
Mindy Bender
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Morgan Stanley Account Contract Class Action

This is a proposed class action against Morgan Stanley, apparently concerning contract claims related to customer accounts. The case was brought by the estate of a deceased account holder, but the specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket metadata. The claims are allegations only and have not been proven.

Filed
June 14, 2024
Represents
Estate of Bernard J. Sherlip, The Barrett Living Trust
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

Doximity Securities Litigation Settlement

The Court-appointed Lead Plaintiff settled the securities litigation against Doximity for $31,000,000 in cash. Class members purchased or acquired Doximity common stock during the specified period and were damaged by the alleged conduct.

Settlement fund
$31M
Claim deadline
July 16, 2026
Represents
New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

Six Flags Securities Litigation Settlement

Six Flags Entertainment Corporation and executives James Reid-Anderson and Marshall Barber allegedly violated federal securities laws by making false and misleading statements to investors about the development of Six Flags-branded theme parks in China.

Settlement fund
$40M
Claim deadline
Represents
Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System, Key West Police & Fire Pension Fund, Electrical Workers Pension Fund Local 103 IBEW
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

Energy Transfer Securities Litigation Settlement

Energy Transfer LP and four individual defendants allegedly violated federal securities laws by making false and misleading statements regarding Energy Transfer's construction of pipeline projects in Pennsylvania. The investors alleged these misstatements occurred during the class period. The defendants have settled the case for $15 million without admitting any wrongdoing.

Settlement fund
$15M
Claim deadline
Represents
ALLEGHENY COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

Mattel Securities Litigation Settlement

Mattel allegedly violated federal securities laws by making false and misleading statements and omitting material facts about its internal controls and financial results. Specifically, the company allegedly concealed misstatements in its third and fourth quarter 2017 financial statements. Mattel has agreed to settle for $98 million without admitting wrongdoing.

Settlement fund
$98M
Claim deadline
June 8, 2022
Represents
Houston Municipal Employees Pension System, DeKalb County Employees Retirement System, New Orleans Employees Retirement System
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

Plantronics Securities Litigation Settlement

Plantronics and several of its senior officers allegedly made false and misleading statements regarding the company's sales practices, violating federal securities laws. Defendants deny the allegations and any wrongdoing. The company has agreed to pay $29.5 million to settle the case without admitting liability.

Settlement fund
$29.5M
Claim deadline
June 25, 2025
Represents
Roofers Pension Fund, Ilya Trubnikov

“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.