Erakat v. GoodRx Data Breach or Consumer Class Action
Verified September 19, 2026Found via the federal court docketHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, E.D. California (No. 2:26-cv-02291).
- June 26, 2026Case filed
What happened
A proposed class action against GoodRx, Inc., apparently concerning consumer harm related to the company's operations or data practices. The docket shows early litigation proceedings with multiple attorneys added for the defendant, but the specific allegations cannot be determined from the available docket entries, which do not include the actual complaint text.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Erakat v. GoodRx Data Breach or Consumer Class Action case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed June 26, 2026 in the District Court, E.D. California (No. 2:26-cv-02291).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the Erakat v. GoodRx Data Breach or Consumer Class Action?
- For the plaintiffs: Ross Cornell (Law Offices of Ross Cornell APC); Reuben David Nathan (Nathan & Associates, APC). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Monzer Erakat
Defendants
- GoodRx, Inc.
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Ross CornellLaw Offices of Ross Cornell APCRepresents Monzer Erakat31 tracked casesrc@rosscornelllaw.com · (562) 612-1708
- Reuben David NathanNathan & Associates, APCRepresents Monzer Erakat46 tracked casesrnathan@nathanlawpractice.com · (949) 270-2798
Other cases these firms appear in
- Dawkins v. Midfirst Bank · Law Offices of Ross Cornell APC
- Preferred Bank Consumer Class Action · Law Offices of Ross Cornell APC
- Dawkins v. East West Bank · Law Offices of Ross Cornell APC
- Dawkins v. Citizens Financial Group Class Action · Law Offices of Ross Cornell APC
- Scruggs v. Vivid Seats Class Action · Nathan & Associates, APC
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
In the news
- Michigan independent pharmacy suing GoodRx over alleged price-fixing schemeCBS News · November 12, 2025
- NCPA Joins Class Action Suit Against GoodRx; CVS Caremark Corp.; Express Scripts, Inc.; MedImpact Healthcare Systems, Inc.; and Navitus Health Solutions, LLCNcpa.org · January 23, 2025
Headlines via NewsAPI.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.
More privacy settlements
View all →Forbes Media Website Tracker Class Action Settlement
Pro rata payments from the Settlement Fund after deductions for administration costs, court-awarded attorneys' fees and costs, and incentive awards
American Vision Partners Data Breach Settlement
Pro-rata cash payments or out-of-pocket expense claims for Damages Settlement Class Members
Skin360 BIPA Settlement
Equal payment to all valid claimants from the $4.7 million Settlement Fund, minus Settlement Administrator costs, attorneys' fees (up to one-third of the fund), and service payments to Class Representatives (up to $5,000 each)