Goff v. The Chemours Company FC Class Action
Last verified September 6, 2026Source: courtlistener-litigationHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This case was recently filed and is being litigated — the claims below are allegations, not proven facts, and there is no settlement, claim form, or payout yet. Watch the case (right) and we'll email you when it moves, including if it settles and a claim process opens.
What happened
This is a proposed class action against The Chemours Company FC, LLC involving personal property claims. Based on the limited docket information available, the specific allegations cannot be determined from the caption and nature of suit code alone, but the personal property classification suggests potential consumer product liability or property damage claims that could affect ordinary consumers.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Goff v. The Chemours Company FC Class Action case?
- No. This case has been filed and is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. Many class actions are dismissed or never certified, so a case being filed does not mean anyone will be paid. If it settles and a claim process opens, that will be announced by a court-appointed settlement administrator.
- Where is the Goff v. The Chemours Company FC Class Action case being heard?
- The case is before the District Court, S.D. West Virginia, case number 2:26-cv-00560. Everything alleged in the complaint is an allegation, not a proven fact.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Aimee Cross
- Jason Goff
Defendants
- The Chemours Company
- The Chemours Company FC, LLC
Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Ready-Mix Concrete Price-Fixing Settlement
From January 2010 through July 2016, Argos, Thomas Concrete, Lafarge, Coastal, Evans, and Elite allegedly participated in an unlawful conspiracy to raise, fix, maintain, or stabilize the price of ready-mix concrete sold from certain plants in the Savannah area. Argos has agreed to pay $17.5 million to resolve the lawsuit.
Payments will be made after deducting Court-approved Class Counsel's attorneys' fees (up to 1/3 of settlement) and expenses (up to $850,000), notice and administrative costs, and class representative incentive payments from the Settlement Amount.
Schnucks Sales Tax Settlement
Schnucks Markets allegedly charged customers sales tax on the full retail price of purchases before applying reward points discounts, instead of calculating sales tax on the discounted total after rewards were applied. The company collected excess sales tax on these transactions between May 2020 and August 2026 in Missouri.
Up to $7
Dr. Squatch Personal Care Products Settlement
Dr. Squatch allegedly represented that certain of its shampoo, conditioner, deodorant, soap and other personal care products were natural even though they contained certain ingredients the plaintiffs claim were synthetic. Dr. Squatch denies all allegations and maintains the products were properly labeled. The company is settling without admitting wrongdoing to avoid further litigation.
Payment calculated pro rata based on the number of valid claim forms submitted
Service Spot Settlement - ParkOn.com and CheapAirportParking.org Reservation Fee
Service Spot, LLC and TripGate LLC allegedly failed to properly disclose a mandatory Reservation Fee for online bookings on ParkOn.com and CheapAirportParking.org in violation of California's Honest Pricing Law. The defendants deny they violated any law but agreed to settle to avoid further litigation costs.
Pro rata portion of the Settlement Fund based on the total amount of processing fees paid