Martinez v. Transglobal Holding Co.
Last verified September 19, 2026Source: courtlistener-litigationHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This case was recently filed and is being litigated — the claims below are allegations, not proven facts, and there is no settlement, claim form, or payout yet. Watch the case (right) and we'll email you when it moves, including if it settles and a claim process opens.
What happened
A proposed class action filed by multiple plaintiffs (Martinez, Zacharias, Kang) against Transglobal Holding Co. and Transglobal Insurance Agency, Inc., concerning personal property matters. The case involves an amended complaint with jury demand and appears to involve disputes potentially affecting insurance customers or account holders, though the specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket entries.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Martinez v. Transglobal Holding Co. case?
- No. This case has been filed and is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. Many class actions are dismissed or never certified, so a case being filed does not mean anyone will be paid. If it settles and a claim process opens, that will be announced by a court-appointed settlement administrator.
- Where is the Martinez v. Transglobal Holding Co. case being heard?
- The case is before the District Court, D. Nevada, case number 2:26-cv-01603. Everything alleged in the complaint is an allegation, not a proven fact.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Crystal Kang(Consol Plaintiff)
- Eapan Zacharias(Consol Plaintiff)
- Fernando Martinez
Defendants
- Transglobal Insurance Agency, Inc.
- Transglobal Holding Co.
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Younjin LeeBIBIYAN LAW GROUP, P.C.
- Michael KindKind Law
- William B FedermanFederman & Sherwood
- Patrick R. LevertyLeverty & Associates Chtd
- William B. FedermanFederman & Sherwood
- Jessica A WilkesFederman & Sherwood
- Michael J. GayanClaggett & Sykes Law Firm
- Panida AndersonBAILEY & GLASSER, LLP
- Erica C. MedleyClaggett & Sykes Law Firm
- David BibiyanBIBIYAN LAW GROUP, P.C.
- Bart CohenBailey & Glasser
- William SykesClaggett and Sykes Law Firm
- Jennifer LeeBIBIYAN LAW GROUP, P.C.
Counsel for defendants
Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More insurance settlements
View all →Anthem Brand Name Drugs Denial of Coverage Settlement
Anthem denied coverage or applied deductibles to brand name (single source) prescription drugs for members with Core 5000, Tonik DN14, Tonik DN15, or RightPlan plans that should have covered these drugs as generic. The settlement requires Anthem to reimburse out-of-pocket expenses for denied brand name drugs and refund deductibles improperly charged. Anthem admits no wrongdoing.
…moreUp to $8,850
LADR Surgery Settlement
Aetna Life Insurance Company denied coverage for single-level lumbar artificial disc replacement (L-ADR) surgeries, claiming they were experimental or investigational. The settlement requires Aetna to reconsider coverage decisions and provide relief to members who were wrongly denied.
…moreUp to $55,000