CClaimWatch
In litigation — no settlement yetemployment

Srinivas v. Amazon.com Inc. Employment Class Action

Last verified September 19, 2026Source: courtlistener-litigationHow ClaimWatch verifies cases

This case was recently filed and is being litigated — the claims below are allegations, not proven facts, and there is no settlement, claim form, or payout yet. Watch the case (right) and we'll email you when it moves, including if it settles and a claim process opens.

What happened

A proposed class action against Amazon.com Inc. based on the nature of suit designation for civil rights related to employment. The specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket information, but the case appears to concern potential employment-related civil rights claims that could affect multiple Amazon employees or job applicants.

Do you qualify?

No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.

How to file

There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.

Common questions

Can I file a claim in the Srinivas v. Amazon.com Inc. Employment Class Action case?
No. This case has been filed and is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. Many class actions are dismissed or never certified, so a case being filed does not mean anyone will be paid. If it settles and a claim process opens, that will be announced by a court-appointed settlement administrator.
Where is the Srinivas v. Amazon.com Inc. Employment Class Action case being heard?
The case is before the District Court, W.D. Washington, case number 2:26-cv-01199. Everything alleged in the complaint is an allegation, not a proven fact.

Who's involved

Plaintiffs

  • Caitlin Cordova
  • Melissa Sharp
  • Rachel Walker
  • Terisha Taylor
  • Amy Cisneroz
  • Gayatri Srinivas

Defendants

  • Amazon.com Inc

Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.

New to class actions?

This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.

More employment settlements

View all →
January 11, 2028No proof neededemployment

TBJ Drywall & Taping Wage Settlement

The Illinois Attorney General sued TBJ Drywall & Taping, Inc. for allegedly failing to properly pay workers in accordance with Illinois law, including failure to pay overtime wages. Following an investigation, the parties settled, with TBJ agreeing to pay owed wages and other compensation to eligible workers.

…more

Amount varies by worker; see mailed/emailed notice for individual amount

Deadline TBDemployment

PacBell Employment Practices Settlement

Pacific Bell Telephone Company allegedly violated California's Kin Care law (Labor Code sections 233 and 234) and Paid Sick-Days law (Labor Code section 246.5) by treating the use of accrued kin-care and paid sick-days as unprotected absences subject to discipline. The company allegedly engaged in unfair business practices and violated the Private Attorneys General Act. Pacific Bell denies all allegations.

…more

A sum of money based on the number of workweeks worked for Defendant from January 1, 2021 to October 23, 2025

Deadline TBDemployment

AOCLSC INC. Wage and Hour Settlement

Former employees of AOCLSC INC. sued the company for alleged wage and hour violations. The company has agreed to settle by paying back wages to non-exempt hourly employees who worked during the class period and paying penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act.

…more