PacBell (Pacific Bell) Employment Settlement
Based on the number of workweeks you worked for Defendant from January 1, 2021 to October 23, 2025
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was March 7, 2026. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Pacific Bell Telephone Company allegedly violated California labor laws by treating the use of accrued kin-care and paid sick-days as unprotected absences subject to discipline, in violation of California Labor Code sections 233, 234, and 246.5. The company also allegedly committed unfair business practices under the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). The defendant disputes these claims and denies any wrongdoing.
Do you qualify?
All current and former employees of Pacific Bell Telephone Company who worked in California at any time from January 1, 2021 to October 23, 2025, and were classified as non-exempt employees.
How to file
If you do nothing, you will receive a sum of money based on the number of workweeks you worked for Defendant from January 1, 2021 to October 23, 2025. To opt-out or exclude yourself from the Settlement, or to object to the Settlement, you must submit a valid written request before March 7, 2026.
Common questions
- How much does the PacBell (Pacific Bell) Employment Settlement pay?
- Estimated payout: Based on the number of workweeks you worked for Defendant from January 1, 2021 to October 23, 2025. Actual amounts depend on how many valid claims are filed — most settlements divide a fixed fund pro rata, so a higher claim rate means a smaller individual check. An "up to" figure is a cap, not a guarantee.
- What is the claim deadline for the PacBell (Pacific Bell) Employment Settlement?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was March 7, 2026. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Is the PacBell (Pacific Bell) Employment Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Atticus Administration is the settlement administrator for this case. Claims are filed at pacbellsettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the PacBell (Pacific Bell) Employment Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. Payments cannot be issued until the court grants final approval and any appeals are resolved.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →EEOC v. Meathead Movers Age Discrimination Settlement
The EEOC alleged that Meathead Movers, Inc. violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act by engaging in age discrimination in hiring and recruitment since at least 2017. The company was accused of discriminating against job applicants based on their age. Meathead Movers agreed to settle these claims through a court-approved Consent Decree on October 14, 2025.
Up to $2 million total to be distributed among eligible class members
SkinSpirit Essential Employee Wage and Hour Settlement
SkinSpirit Essential is paying to settle a class action lawsuit brought by former employee Sarah Rad alleging wage and hour violations under California law. The settlement covers wages and penalties for non-exempt employees who worked for SkinSpirit during the class period and penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act (PAGA).
Petzing v. The Seven Motor Corporation Employment Application Settlement
The Seven Motor Corporation allegedly failed to disclose the wage scale or salary range in its job postings for open positions in Washington. The defendant disputes the claims and contends it has not violated any law.
Up to $2,172.30
Hill v. Delphinus Engineering Inc. Settlement
Delphinus Engineering Inc. allegedly failed to disclose wage scales, salary ranges, and general descriptions of benefits and other compensation in job postings for open positions in Washington. The defendant disputes the claims and denies any violation of law.
The settlement fund ranges from $1,802,386.04 to $2,745,000.00 depending on the number of claims submitted.