McGowan v. Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company
Last verified September 19, 2026Source: courtlistener-litigationHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This case was recently filed and is being litigated — the claims below are allegations, not proven facts, and there is no settlement, claim form, or payout yet. Watch the case (right) and we'll email you when it moves, including if it settles and a claim process opens.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, E.D. California (No. 2:26-cv-01094).
- March 24, 2026Case filed
What happened
A proposed class action has been filed against Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company involving contract-related claims. The specific allegations cannot be fully determined from the available docket information, but the case appears to concern a contractual dispute that may affect multiple insurance policyholders or account holders.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the McGowan v. Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company case?
- No. This case has been filed and is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. Many class actions are dismissed or never certified, so a case being filed does not mean anyone will be paid. If it settles and a claim process opens, that will be announced by a court-appointed settlement administrator.
- Where is the McGowan v. Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company case being heard?
- The case is before the District Court, E.D. California, case number 2:26-cv-01094. Everything alleged in the complaint is an allegation, not a proven fact.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Karen Murphy-Acosta
- Heather McGowan
Defendants
- Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Andrea Nishi , PHVRepresents Heather McGowan, Karen Murphy-Acosta
- Jacob Gardener , PHVRepresents Heather McGowan, Karen Murphy-Acosta
- Steve Cohen , PHVPollock Cohen LLPRepresents Heather McGowan, Karen Murphy-Acostascohen@pollockcohen.com · (917) 364-4197
- Ben TravisBen Travis Law, APCRepresents Heather McGowan, Karen Murphy-Acosta7 tracked cases · $610,000 in disclosed settlementsben@bentravislaw.com · (619) 353-7966
Counsel for defendants
- Kenneth N SmersfeltCrowell & Moring LLPRepresents Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Companyksmersfelt@crowell.com · (213) 622-4750
- Beatrice B. NguyenCrowell & Moring LLPRepresents Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Companybbnguyen@crowell.com · (415) 986-2800
Other cases these firms appear in
- Johnson v. Paylogix LLC · Pollock Cohen LLP
- Oscar Health Data Breach Class Action · Pollock Cohen LLP
- Fieldtex Products Consumer Contract Class Action · Pollock Cohen LLP
- Blue Shield of California Life & Health Insurance Class Action · Pollock Cohen LLP
- Edquid v. Headlight Health Data Breach Class Action · Ben Travis Law, APC
Parties and counsel from the public court docket; contact details as filed with the court. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More insurance settlements
View all →Anthem Brand Name Drugs Denial of Coverage Settlement
Anthem denied coverage or applied deductibles to brand name (single source) prescription drugs for members with Core 5000, Tonik DN14, Tonik DN15, or RightPlan plans that should have covered these drugs as generic. The settlement requires Anthem to reimburse out-of-pocket expenses for denied brand name drugs and refund deductibles improperly charged. Anthem admits no wrongdoing.
…moreUp to $8,850
LADR Surgery Settlement
Aetna Life Insurance Company denied coverage for single-level lumbar artificial disc replacement (L-ADR) surgeries, claiming they were experimental or investigational. The settlement requires Aetna to reconsider coverage decisions and provide relief to members who were wrongly denied.
…moreUp to $55,000