Pearson v. Google LLC Class Action
Last verified July 21, 2026Source: courtlistener-litigationHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This case was recently filed and is being litigated — the claims below are allegations, not proven facts, and there is no settlement, claim form, or payout yet. Watch the case (right) and we'll email you when it moves, including if it settles and a claim process opens.
What happened
A proposed class action has been filed against Google LLC in the Northern District of California. The complaint alleges unspecified claims under statutory law, with the nature of suit classified as 'Other Statutory Actions.' Without access to the complaint's substantive allegations, the specific claims cannot be determined from the docket entry alone, though the case is brought as a class action by named plaintiffs Corinne Pearson and Melenie Crutcher.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Pearson v. Google LLC Class Action case?
- No. This case has been filed and is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. Many class actions are dismissed or never certified, so a case being filed does not mean anyone will be paid. If it settles and a claim process opens, that will be announced by a court-appointed settlement administrator.
- Where is the Pearson v. Google LLC Class Action case being heard?
- The case is before the District Court, N.D. California, case number 5:26-cv-07495. Everything alleged in the complaint is an allegation, not a proven fact.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Melenie Crutcher
- Corinne Pearson
Defendants
- Google LLC
Counsel for plaintiffs
Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.
In the news
Headlines via NewsAPI. ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with these publications.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More privacy settlements
View all →Schuster Company Data Breach Settlement
In January 2024, Schuster Company experienced a cybersecurity incident affecting its computer systems. Certain files containing personal information, including names, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, and driver's license or state identification numbers, may have been accessed. Schuster denies wrongdoing, and the parties have agreed to settle to avoid ongoing litigation costs and risks.
Aspire Health Alliance Data Breach Settlement
Aspire Health Alliance experienced a targeted cyberattack on its computer systems in September 2023 that potentially exposed patient private information including names, dates of birth, health insurance policy numbers, medical condition and treatment information, and Medicare or Medicaid numbers. Aspire denies wrongdoing, but has agreed to settle the class action lawsuit to avoid continued litigation costs and risks.
Naper Grove Data Breach Settlement
Naper Grove Vision Care, P.C. suffered a targeted cyberattack on its computer systems in May 2025. The attack resulted in unauthorized access to files containing personal information, including names combined with Social Security numbers and other non-public personally identifiable information. Naper Grove denies wrongdoing, and the parties have agreed to settle to avoid the costs and risks of continued litigation.
Columbus Regional Health Data Breach Settlement
Columbus Regional Health allegedly disclosed patients' confidential personally identifiable information (PII) and protected health information (PHI) to third-party technologies without patient consent. The defendant denies all claims and maintains it did nothing wrong but agreed to settle to avoid litigation costs and uncertainties.
Up to $25.50