Asiedu v. Garden Savings Federal Credit Union Repossession Settlement
Last verified September 18, 2026Source: atticusHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Garden Savings Federal Credit Union allegedly wrongfully repossessed motor vehicles from borrowers with finance agreements. The settlement provides for payments to class members and the relinquishment of any deficiency balances owed to the defendant.
Do you qualify?
Anyone who had a finance agreement with Garden Savings Federal Credit Union and had their motor vehicle repossessed by the defendant between March 20, 2009 and March 20, 2015.
What you can claim
Read from the official settlement notice. Confirm the terms that apply to you on the administrator's site before filing.
Deficiency balance relinquishment
Defendant shall relinquish any deficiency balance from the Finance Agreement of each Class Member.
Who is in the class
individuals or entities who had finance agreements with Defendant and subsequently had their motor vehicles repossessed by Defendant between March 20, 2009 and March 20, 2015
Quoted from the settlement notice.
How to file
Settlement checks were mailed to participating class members on July 30, 2026. No additional claim filing is required if you do nothing. If you have not received your settlement payment or if your check is lost or damaged, contact the Settlement Administrator at [email protected] for assistance.
Common questions
- Is the Asiedu v. Garden Savings Federal Credit Union Repossession Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Settlement Administrator is the settlement administrator for this case. Claims are filed at gardensavingsrepossessionsettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Asiedu v. Garden Savings Federal Credit Union Repossession Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. Payments cannot be issued until the court grants final approval and any appeals are resolved.
Who's involved
Counsel for plaintiffs
Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More finance settlements
View all →Brimmer v. City of Overland Special Deterrent Fees Settlement
The City of Overland charged individuals Special Deterrent Fees. The court has approved a settlement requiring the city to refund these fees to eligible class members.
Up to $80
Non-Bank ATM Surcharge Settlement
Visa and Mastercard allegedly violated antitrust laws by creating operating rules that prohibited independent ATM operators from charging lower access fees for transactions on competing networks. This forced cardholders to pay higher ATM surcharges than necessary. Visa and Mastercard deny the claims.
…moreSettlement Fund will be distributed proportionally (pro rata) to each valid claimant after deductions for attorneys' fees (up to 30%), litigation costs, notice and administration costs, and service awards (up to $17,500 per class representative)
Visa and Mastercard ATM Access Fees Class Action Settlement
Visa and Mastercard are accused of charging cardholders excessive access fees for cash withdrawals at independent ATMs (ATMs not owned by Visa, Mastercard, banks, or other financial institutions). Claimants allege the payment networks' operating rules constituted price fixing and violated federal and state antitrust laws by enabling higher ATM fees than should have been charged. Visa and Mastercard deny wrongdoing but have agreed to settle.
…moreEach eligible claimant will receive a share of the net settlement fund based on the number of eligible surcharged transactions they submit.
CFPB v. Tempoe LLC - Consumer Lease Settlement
Tempoe, LLC, a consumer finance leasing company, engaged in unfair and deceptive practices by failing to provide required additional disclosures to consumers whose leases were extended on a month-to-month basis for more than six months after the initial term. On September 11, 2023, the CFPB issued a consent order imposing a permanent ban on consumer leasing and a $2 million penalty.
…more